NTSB CAROL · Event
Event CHI95IA313
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
improper installation of the #7 and #8 fuel nozzle manifold transfer tubes by company maintenance personnel, and an inadequate exhaust drain fitting gasket, which resulted in fuel leaks at the respective 'O' ring/gasket fittings; blockage of the fuel/oil drain manifold; and subsequent fire in the engine compartment.
Factual narrative
On September 6, 1995, at 0918 central daylight time (cdt), an Aerospatiale ATR 72, N414WF, operated by Simmon's Airlines, Incorporated of Dallas, Texas, as American Eagle Flight number 4118, and piloted by an airline transport rated pilot, received minor damage when its number one engine exhaust section and aft nacelle was involved in a fire. The flight crew shut the engine down and extinguished the fire, and returned the airplane to its departure airport. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the incident. The 14 CFR Part 121 flight was operating on an IFR flight plan. No injuries were reported by the 4 flight crew members and 14 passengers. The flight departed Chicago, Illinois, at 0854 cdt. The on-scene investigation revealed the number one engine's lower cowl interior had heat discoloration under the turbine support case (TSC) drain fitting. Heat discoloration was also noted on the TSC's lower half. Additional heat discoloration was observed on the bell mouth area of the nacelle exhaust trough and associated fire loop hardware. Sooting was observed on the nacelle heat shrouds and tailpipe areas. The TSC drain line fitting had tongue shaped soot patterns originating from its edges. The engine's drain system manifold (manifold) is located forward of the TSC assembly on the bottom of the engine. Inspection of the manifold found that it would not drain excess fuel overboard as it was designed to do. The exit drain line from the manifold to nacelle drain mast was 99 percent blocked. Removal of the blockage revealed it to be a carbon-like material. The blockage was at the end of the drain line attached to the mast fixture. See drawing appended to this report. The TSC drain line fitting was removed for inspection. A copper crush gasket (gasket) was found on the fitting's nipple end. The gasket interior size was about 40 percent larger than the nipple size. The gasket was not centered on the exhaust section nipple opening. An offset pattern shaped like the gasket surrounded this opening. The gasket interior and exterior edges were burned and deformed. Examination of the fuel nozzle manifold found number 7 and 8 fuel nozzle transfer tubes had leaking "O" rings. According to the Federal Aviation Administration Principal Maintenance Inspector (PMI) associated with the investigation, the manufacturer's recommended procedure had not been followed by company maintenance personnel. The procedure specifies that the "O" rings be installed onto the transfer tube. The transfer tube is installed into the manifold. It is then removed and the "O" rings examined for damage. If no damage is found, the transfer tube can be installed with the "O" rings. Two of the "O" rings for number 7 and 8 nozzles were cut and had scratches in them. Six other "O" rings were not seated properly. This type of condition creates an internal leak that is bypassed to the manifold's drain line. Airplane maintenance records showed both engines on N414WF had their fuel nozzles changed on September 5 and 6, 1995. Flight 4118 was the first flight of the day after the maintenance had been performed. There is no requirement to check the nacelle drain mast line after a fuel nozzle change. The drain line inspection had been accomplished about 100 hours before the nozzle change. This inspection was done within the manufacturer's recommended 300 hour interval. The drain manifold's fuel nozzle drain line and TSC drain line are positioned directly opposite each other. Leaking fuel is normally ported out the nacelle mast drain attached to the system drain manifold. The fuel manifold transfer tube locking plates for the number 7 and 8 nozzle assemblies were found improperly installed. According to the PMI, this increases the fuel leak flow rate. Fuel pressure within the manifold lines is approximately 930 pounds per square inch at takeoff. Refer to the maintenance manual excerpt appended to this report for correct installation procedures. On August 24, 1994, Pratt and Whitney issued a Service Information Letter (SIL) that addressed an improved "O" ring. The SIL states, in part, that some operators had found "O" rings that did not conform to Pratt and Whitney specifications. Pratt and Whitney offered the operators an even exchange of the old stock numbered "O" rings for the newer type (AS3209 and ST3367 respectively). Pratt and Whitney issued Service Bulletin number 21364 on September 16, 1994. The bulletin strongly recommended the use of the new "O" ring. The current Pratt and Whitney illustrated parts' catalog shows the part numbers for both "O" rings. Copies of these documents are appended to this report. The airplane was on its first flight of the day after engine fuel system maintenance. While climbing through 7500 feet, the fire warning system activated. The flight crew extinguished the fire, secured the engine, and returned to the departure airport. Examination of the engine revealed that a fuel leak had occurred at the #7 and #8 fuel manifold nozzle transfer tubes. The fuel manifold transfer tube locking plates for the #7 and #8 nozzle assemblies were found improperly installed, and the respective 'O' rings were found to be cut and scratched. Also, the engine's overboard (fuel/oil) drain line was found to be about 99% blocked with a carbon-like material. Additionally, the engine's fuel manifold and turbine support case drain lines were noted to be positioned directly opposite each other within the drain manifold. The drain line's turbine support case fitting had an oversized and offset, crush gasket. The nacelle's interior had a flame discolored area directly below this fitting. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1995_CHI95IA313.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper
The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences)
Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER)
A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗