CHI95LA235
1995-07-23 · SPRINGFIELD, Missouri, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport SGF
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
improper in-flight planning/decision by the pilot, and his continued flight into adverse weather conditions, which resulted in an uncontrolled altitude deviation and collision with terrain. Factors relating to the accident were: the adverse weather conditions.
Factual narrative
On July 23, 1995, at 1910 central daylight time (cdt), a Cessna 172, N55212, piloted by a private pilot, was substantially damaged during a landing approach to runway 32 (5,600' X 150' wet asphalt) at the Springfield Regional Airport, Springfield, Missouri. Instrument meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The personal 14 CFR Part 91 flight was not operating on a flight plan. The pilot and passenger reported no injuries. The flight departed from Ozark, Missouri, at 1800 cdt. According to the pilot's written statement on NTSB Form 6120.1/2, the purpose of the flight was to pick up a passenger at Ozark, Missouri. The pilot was preparing to depart Springfield, Missouri. Before departing, he said he noticed bluish colored clouds west of the airport. He asked the tower controller about the clouds and was told they were associated with rain northwest of the airport. The pilot said the controller advised him that the rain was moving in a northeasterly direction. He said he decided to depart based on the tower controller's report and the information he had obtained about his destination airport. He arrived at Ozark, Missouri, and picked up his passenger. After departing Ozark, Missouri, the pilot contacted the Springfield, Missouri, control tower. He said the controller advised him there was "...weather..." about 5 miles west of the airport. He said he assumed the weather was the rain he had been told about before departing Springfield, Missouri. About 2 minutes after the conversation the pilot was advised of a wind shift by the controller. The winds, according to the pilot, were reported to be "...350 degrees at 10 gusting to 16." The pilot said the controller was changing the active runway from runway 20 to 02. The controller offered the pilot runway 32 for his use when he was on a 2 mile final for runway 32. The pilot said his airplane was on short final for runway 32. He said the airplane was about 300 to 400 feet above the ground, "...when the wind jolted the airplane sharply, pushing us down." He said the airplane encountered a second downdraft that not only caused it to descend further, but also moved the airplane to the right. The pilot called the control tower and advised them that he was going to try to land on runway 02. A few moments later, the airplane encountered a third downdraft. This forced the airplane onto the ground about 200 to 300 yards north of runway 32, near runway 20. The pilot and passenger removed themselves from the wreckage as a "...torrent of rain began." According to the pilot, the wreckage cleanup had to be postponed about 30 minutes due to the rain and wind intensity. At 1915 cdt, the control tower reported thunderstorms with heavy rain showers, and 3/4 mile visibility. THE PILOT STATED THAT HE CALLED THE CONTROL TOWER AT HIS DESTINATION AIRPORT SHORTLY AFTER TAKEOFF. HE SAID THE TOWER CONTROLLER TOLD HIM THERE WAS WEATHER ABOUT 5 MILES WEST. THE PILOT SAID HE ASSUMED THIS WAS THE SAME WEATHER DESCRIBED TO HIM DURING AN EARLIER CONVERSATION WITH THE SAME TOWER. AS THE AIRPLANE APPROACHED THE RUNWAY FOR LANDING, THE PILOT WAS ADVISED OF A WIND SHIFT AND RUNWAY CHANGE. HE SAID THAT WHEN THE AIRPLANE WAS 300 TO 400 FEET ABOVE THE GROUND, THE WIND 'JOLTED' THE AIRPLANE, '...PUSHING IT DOWN SHARPLY... .' THE AIRPLANE ENCOUNTERED A SECOND AND THIRD DOWNDRAFT. THE THIRD DOWNDRAFT FORCED THE AIRPLANE ONTO THE GROUND NORTH OF THE RUNWAY. THE PILOT SAID THE RAIN AND WIND THAT FOLLOWED THE ACCIDENT WERE INTENSE. AT 1915 CDT, TOWER PERSONNEL REPORTED THUNDERSTORMS WITH HEAVY RAIN SHOWERS AND 3/4 MILE VISIBILITY. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1995_CHI95LA235.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (thunderstorm). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2023 · Reprint (Version printed in journal) Finite Element Simulation of Three Full-Scale Crash Tests for Cessna 172 Aircraft
The NASA Emergency Locator Transmitter Survivability and Reliability project was initiated in 2013 to assess the crash performance standards for the next generation of emergency locator transmitter (E…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Crash Testing and Simulation of a Cessna 172 Aircraft: Pitch Down Impact Onto Soft Soil
During the summer of 2015, NASA Langley Research Center conducted three full-scale crash tests of Cessna 172 (C-172) aircraft at the NASA Langley Landing and Impact Research (LandIR) Facility.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Technical Memorandum (TM) Simulating the Impact Response of Three Full-Scale Crash Tests of Cessna 172 Aircraft
During the summer of 2015, a series of three full-scale crash tests were performed at the Landing and Impact Research Facility located at NASA Langley Research Center of Cessna 172 aircraft.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (IJAAA) The Impact of Thunderstorms on Take-off Data in South Africa
Aviation and meteorology are entwined disciplines, as aviation occurs in the atmosphere. Prevailing weather conditions at take-off are of utmost importance to aviation.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Technical Memorandum (TM) Thunderstorm hazards flight research: Storm hazards 1980 overview
A highly instrumented NASA F-106B aircraft, modified for the storm hazards mission and protected against direct lightning strikes, was used in conjunction with various ground based radar and lightning…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Proceedings Operational evaluation of thunderstorm penetration test flights during project Storm Hazards '80
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration is conducting a research project called Storm Hazards '80 in order to study the prediction, detectability and avoidance of the hazards of severe storm…