NTSB CAROL · Event
Event CHI97LA281
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the flight instructor's (CFI') improper in-flight planning/decision, which led to fuel exhaustion and loss of engine power before the airplane was safely landed.
Factual narrative
On August 27, 1997, at 1945 central daylight time (cdt), a Cessna 150M, N704TL, operated by a commercial pilot, sustained substantial damage when on takeoff the airplane's engine lost power. During the subsequent forced landing attempt, the airplane impacted the terrain. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The instructional flight was being conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. There was no flight plan on file. Neither the instructor pilot or the dual student reported any injuries. The flight originated at Benton, Kansas, at 1815 cdt. In his written statement, the instructor said that he had planned for an hour and 30 minute flight with a 30 minute fuel reserve. The instructor and student took off, went out east of the airport to do practice training maneuvers, and then returned to the airport to do some traffic pattern work. "We were approaching our 30 minute reserve and I determined the next landing would be a full stop. The student misunderstood my instructions and was attempting a touch-and-go. The student came in high and fast, touching down momentarily around mid-field. Rather than attempt a full stop, I allowed the student to go around." The instructor said that he believed he had enough reserve fuel to do one more pattern. "On climbout the engine quit. I assumed control of the aircraft. The pilot instructor turned the airplane back toward the runway and touched down in a field "a few hundred feet west of the departure end of the active runway." A witness, who saw the airplane take off from the airport, said that he heard "the engine of the airplane sputtering. At that time, the airplane was about 15 feet above the ground. The engine came alive for another 10 to 20 seconds before it quit totally. After that, the pilot tried to turn back to the airfield. I saw the airplane gliding down till it was finally hidden by a row of trees." The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Inspector who examined the wreckage found the airplane in a field next to the Benton, Kansas airport, approximately one-quarter mile from the end of the runway. The outboard one-third of airplane's left wing was bent upward approximately 45 degrees. The right wing was bent back. The outer 2 feet of the right wing was crushed inward and bent up. The left horizontal stabilizer showed heavy skin wrinkles. The nose wheel was broken off. The propeller showed no rotational scratching or torsional bending. Flight control continuity was confirmed. No anomalies were found in the engine, engine controls, or other airplane systems. Approximately 2 gallons of fuel were drained from the airplane's fuel tanks. The Cessna 150M Pilot's Operating Handbook states that 3.5 gallons of the 26 gallon total fuel capacity is unusable in airplanes configured with the two standard 13 gallon fuel tanks. The flight instructor (CFI) said that he had planned for a 1 hour and 30 minute flight with a 30 minute fuel reserve. He and the student took off, went east of the airport to practice training maneuvers, then returned to the airport to do traffic pattern work. He said they were approaching their 30 minute reserve and he determined the next landing would be a full stop. The student misunderstood the instructions and attempted a touch-and-go. The student came in high and fast, touching down momentarily around mid-field. The CFI allowed the student to perform a go-around, believing that he had enough reserve fuel to do one more pattern. 'On climbout the engine quit.' The CFI turned the airplane back toward the runway and made a forced landing in a field. Examination of the wreckage revealed no anomalies with the airplane. Approximately 2 gallons of fuel were drained from the airplane's fuel tanks. The Pilot's Operating Handbook for the airplane stated that 3.5 gallons of the 26 gallon total fuel capacity were unusable. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1997_CHI97LA281.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (fuel exhaustion, go-around). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper
A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World
Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research)
Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace)
Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes)
Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗