NTSB CAROL · Event
Event CHI98LA191
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the inadequate preflight planning by the pilot in command and exceeding the maximum gross weight for the aircraft. A factor was the berm.
Factual narrative
On June 7, 1998, at 1725 central daylight time, a Beech 23, N2302Q, piloted by a private pilot, was destroyed during an aborted takeoff from runway 19 (2,000' x 47', dry, asphalt) at the Excelsior Springs Memorial Airport, near Excelsior Springs, Missouri. During the aborted takeoff the aircraft departed the prepared runway surface, at the end of runway, and impacted the rising terrain which resulted in a post impact fire. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The 14 CFR Part 91 personal flight was not operating on a flight plan. The pilot and three passengers reported minor injuries. The flight was originating at the time of the accident and had the intended destination of Marshall Memorial Municipal Airport, near Marshall, Missouri. According to the pilot's written statement, he had three passengers on board for the flight and he had filled both wing tanks completely. The pilot initiated a short field takeoff procedure by holding the brakes until full power had been obtained by the engine. Approximately 1,200' down the runway the pilot reached the normal rotation speed, 68-70 knots, and noticed the plane would not become airborne. The pilot decided that the aircraft would not clear a tree line, height between 40' and 50', that was off the end of the runway and aborted the takeoff. During the aborted takeoff, the aircraft overran the end of the runway, impacted a large mound of dirt past the end of the runway, and tore the left and right main landing gear from the wings. Both of the wing fuel tanks were compromised and a post impact fire started. When the aircraft came to a rest, the occupants evacuated from the aircraft with minor injuries. In a telephone conversation with the pilot, the piloted stated that he did not complete a weight and balance calculation or compute takeoff performance as a part of his preflight activities. Using the performance charts for the aircraft and weather conditions at the time of the accident, takeoff performance figures were calculated for the aircraft. The performance charts indicated that the aircraft, properly loaded at the maximum gross weight (2,300 lbs.), would of had a takeoff distance of 1,270' without a 50' foot obstacle and a takeoff distance of 2,160' with a 50' foot obstacle. Runway 19 at Excelsior Springs Memorial Airport is 2,000' long and there are trees less than 1,000' from the end of the runway. Post accident investigation, completed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), showed that the aircraft was operating over maximum allowable gross weight. According to a FAA inspector statement, the aircraft's two wing fuel tanks were completely filled before takeoff and the flight had four occupants aboard. Based on a FAA inspector statement, the pilot operating handbook (POH) for the aircraft in question, individual weights of the passengers, and the amount of fuel on board the aircraft, a weight manifest was compiled: Empty weight of aircraft with undrainable fuel and oil: 1,352.3 lbs. Front seat occupants (Pilot 200 lbs., Passenger 175 lbs.) 375.0 lbs. Rear seat occupants (Passengers 240 lbs., 160 lbs.) 400.0 lbs. Ballast in baggage area 30.0 lbs. Fuel (60 gallons at 6 lbs. per gallon) 360.0 lbs. Total Calculated Weight 2,507.3 lbs. Certified Max Gross Weight 2,300.0 lbs. The pilot initiated a short field takeoff procedure by holding the brakes until full power had been obtained by the engine. Approximately 1,200' down the runway the pilot reached the normal rotation speed, 68-70 knots, and noticed the plane would not become airborne. The pilot decided that the aircraft would not clear a tree line, height between 40' and 50', that was off the end of the runway and aborted the takeoff. During the aborted takeoff, the aircraft overshot the end of the runway, impacted a large mound of dirt past the end of the runway, and tore the left and right main gears from the wings. Both of the fuel tanks were compromised and a post impact fire started. When the aircraft came to a rest, the occupants evacuated from the aircraft with minor injuries. Post accident investigation showed that the aircraft was operating over maximum allowable gross weight. The aircraft's two wing fuel tanks were completely filled before takeoff and the flight had four occupants aboard. In a telephone conversation with the pilot, the piloted stated that he did not complete a weight and balance calculation or compute takeoff performance as a part of his preflight activities. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1998_CHI98LA191.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type. Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR)
Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World
Helicopter Safety Performance Data 2023
Foundation 2023 helicopter safety performance data — global accident rates by mission profile (HEMS, off-shore oil, air-tour, agricultural, news/utility).
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Exploring the atmospheric and weather conditions for hoar frost formation at OR Tambo International Airport: A case study of ground aircraft icing events for the period 2017-2023.
Ground aircraft icing has an adverse effect on the aerodynamic performance of aircrafts as well as the efficient operations of airlines and airports.
- NASA NTRS 2023 · Presentation
NASA Icing Overview 2023
This presentation summarizes NASA icing research for an invited talk to be presented on June 22, 2023, at the SAE International Conference on Icing of Aircraft, Engines, and Structures.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2023 · FSF / AeroSafety World
Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT) — A 2023 Industry Refresh
Foundation 2023 CFIT data refresh — three decades after the original CFIT Task Force eliminated >95% of air-carrier CFIT, the GA + Part 135 communities still account for most CFIT fatalities.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Industry report (AQRR)
Airline Quality Rating 2023
The Airline Quality Rating (AQR) was developed and first announced in early 1991 as an objective method for assessing airline quality on combined multiple performance criteria.
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗