Skip to content

Atlas / NTSB / CHI98LA340

NTSB CAROL · Event

Event CHI98LA340

1998-08-15 TRAVERSE CITY, Michigan, United States Airport · TVC None 1 aircraft Status: Completed

Registry · N6172D

FAA Aircraft Registry record.

Make / Model

CESSNA 172N

Year of manufacture

1979 · 19 years old at event

Engine

LYCOMING 0-320 SERIES (180 hp)

Seats / Engines

4 seats · 1 engine

Last airworthiness date

19790419

ADS-B equipped

Yes — Mode-S A80B61

Registrant of record

BLUE SPRUCE AVIATION LLC

Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).

Aircraft involved

Probable cause & findings

the inadvertent stall/mush. Factors contributing to this accident were the pilot's improper compensation for the wind conditions, and his excessively high flare.

Factual narrative

On August 15, 1998, at 1500 eastern daylight time (edt), a Cessna 172N, N6172D, operated by a private pilot, sustained substantial damage when during landing, the airplane touched down hard on runway 36, at Cherry Capital Airport, Traverse City, Michigan. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The personal flight was being conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. No flight plan was on file. The pilot and passenger on board reported no injuries. The local flight originated at Traverse City, Michigan, at 1415 edt. In his written statement, the pilot said that he performed a normal traffic pattern to a touch and go. During the landing flare, the airplane's right wing and nose rose abruptly. The pilot said that he maintained back pressure to hold the proper attitude. The airplane's nose "dipped and encountered [the] runway surface." The pilot said that he performed a go-around and flew another traffic pattern to a full-stop landing. A Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector examined the airplane at the Cherry Capital Airport. The tips of both propeller blades were bent aft. The engine firewall was buckled at the four attachment points for the nose gear. Flight control continuity was confirmed. No anomalies were found with the engine, engine controls or other airplane systems. The pilot said that he performed a normal traffic pattern to a touch and go. During the landing flare, the airplane's right wing and nose rose abruptly. The pilot said that he maintained back pressure to hold the proper attitude. The airplane's nose 'dipped and encountered [the] runway surface.' The pilot said that he performed a go-around and flew another traffic pattern to a full-stop landing. Examination of the airplane revealed no anomalies. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12

Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file NTSB_1998_CHI98LA340.txt. Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb. Full investigation docket on data.ntsb.gov ↗.

Related research

What the literature says.

Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, go-around). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.

Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗