NTSB CAROL · Event
Event DEN01LA055
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the flight instructor inadvertently stalling the airplane during a forced landing. Contributing factors were fuel exhaustion due to inadvertent opening of the fuel drain, lack of familiarity with the airplane, inadequate supervision of the flight, and the missing strainer spring.
Factual narrative
On February 26, 2001, at 1144 mountain standard time, a Cessna 172F, N8389U, operated by Flatirons Aviation Corporation of Boulder, Colorado, was substantially damaged when it collided with a barbed wire fence and terrain during a forced landing 3 miles north of Larkspur, Colorado. The commercial certificated flight instructor and the private pilot receiving instruction were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and a VFR flight plan had been filed for the instructional flight being conducted under Title 14 CFR part 91. The flight originated at Boulder, Colorado, approximately 1010, and departed Colorado Springs, Colorado, approximately 1120. In a telephone conversation with the flight instructor, he said the fuel tanks had been filled the night before the accident, and the airplane flew approximately 1.1 hours the next morning just prior to their flight. In his written accident report, the instructor said that shortly after departing Boulder, they became cold (the outside air temperature was 20 degrees F.), and that the heater controls were not in the usual position on the instrument panel (both pilots were accustomed to flying later model Cessna 172s). The private pilot located a "white knob" but could not read the nomenclature plate. Believing it was the heater control, he pulled the knob. The flight proceeded to Colorado Springs, where they made one touch-and-go landing, and headed back towards Boulder at 9,000 feet. At 1135, the instructor noticed the left fuel gauge was reading EMPTY and the right fuel gauge was reading nearly FULL. The fuel selector was switched to the right tank. A few minutes later, the engine lost power. The instructor assumed control of the airplane and turned towards a private airstrip about 2 miles away. The rpivate pilot was instructed to make emergency radio calls and try restarting the engine. As the airplane descended, the instructor realized that strong headwinds were forcing the airplane to land short of the gravel runway. The instructor attempted to "stretch the glide," but the airplane stalled and dropped 15 feet, striking the ground on all three landing gears. The airplane also struck a barbed wire fence, damaging the right wing and shearing off the nose landing gear. The instructor said they had been aloft for 1.7 hours when the engine lost power. Postaccident inspection disclosed the private pilot receiving instruction had inadvertently pulled the fuel strainer control knob instead of the cabin heat control knob. There were no fuel stains on the bottom of the airplane. The salvage crew that retrieved the wreckage reported draining a total of 2 ounces of fuel from the wing tanks. Early model Cessna 172s placed the fuel strainer control on the instrument panel (later models placed it in the engine compartment with access by opening a small door on the engine cowling). The valve is spring-loaded to the CLOSED position. The control knob is pulled to drain fuel, and released to shut off the flow. The salvage crew examined the fuel drain and reported that the spring was missing. According to the Cessna 172F SERVICING INTERVALS CHECK LIST, the fuel strainer should be disassembled and cleaned every 100 hours. The last 100 hour inspection performed on N8389U was on December 14, 2000, 85.67 hours before the accident. Shortly after departure, the flight instructor and his student became cold. The heater control was not in the usual position on the instrument panel (both pilots were accustomed to flying later model Cessna 172s). The student located a "white knob" but could not read the nomenclature plate. Believing it was the heater control, he pulled the knob. Approximately 1.5 hours later, the engine lost power. The instructor assumed control of the airplane and turned towards a private airstrip about 2 miles away. He instructed the student to make emergency radio calls and try restarting the engine. Strong headwinds prevented the airplane from gliding to the runway. The airplane stalled and impacted terrain. The airplane had been aloft for 1.7 hours when the engine lost power. Postaccident inspection disclosed the student had inadvertently pulled the fuel strainer control knob instead of the cabin heat control knob. There were no fuel stains on the bottom of the airplane. The fuel strainer control is spring-loaded to the CLOSED position. Examination disclosed the spring was missing. According to the Cessna 172F SERVICING INTERVALS CHECK LIST, the fuel strainer should be disassembled and cleaned every 100 hours. The last 100 hour inspection performed on N8389U was on December 14, 2000, 85.67 hours before the accident. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2001_DEN01LA055.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing, stall, fuel exhaustion). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint
Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Contractor Report (CR)
An Evaluation of an Analytical Simulation of an Airplane with Tailplane Icing by Comparison to Flight Data
This report presents the assessment of an analytical tool developed as part of the NASA/FAA Tailplane Icing Program. The analytical tool is a specialized simulation program called TAILSM4 which was de…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Technical Publication (TP)
NASA/FAA Tailplane Icing Program: Flight Test Report
This report presents results from research flights that explored the characteristics of an ice-contaminated tailplane using various simulated ice shapes attached to the leading edge of the horizontal …
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Other
[Tail Plane Icing]
The Aviation Safety Program initiated by NASA in 1997 has put greater emphasis in safety related research activities. Ice-contaminated-tailplane stall (ICTS) has been identified by the NASA Lewis Icin…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Contractor Report (CR)
A study of carburetor/induction system icing in general aviation accidents
An assessment of the frequency and severity of carburetor/induction icing in general-aviation accidents was performed. The available literature and accident data from the National Transportation Safet…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗