DEN04LA023
2003-11-18 · Grand Junction, Colorado, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport GJT
N332BA has since been reassigned. It is now registered to a different aircraft (ICON AIRCRAFT INC A5), which was not involved in this event.
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the operator's improper maintenance and servicing of the airplane's nose landing gear assembly, resulting in the collapse of the nose landing gear during the landing roll. Contributing factors include the nose section of the airplane's subsequent contact with the runway, the impact of several fractured propeller pieces into the fuselage, and the operator's inadequate maintenance and servicing procedures.
Factual narrative
On November 18, 2003, at 0721 mountain standard time, a Swearingen SA226TC, N332BA, owned and operated by Key Lime Air Corp., Wilsonville, Oregon, was substantially damaged when it impacted terrain during landing roll at Walker Field (GJT), Grand Junction, Colorado. The pilot, the sole occupant on board, was not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed. No flight plan had been filed for this non-scheduled cargo flight being conducted under the provisions of Title 14 CFR Part 135. The flight originated at Rifle, Colorado, at approximately 0709. According to the pilot, he was cleared to enter left base for a landing on runway 11. The pilot stated that, as he reduced the airspeed to 160 knots, he lowered the landing gear. He stated that he "heard the gear come down," and he verified "three green in the [landing] gear indicator." He stated that he reduced engine power to flight idle as he entered the "base-leg." During the final approach, he had to add engine power, and then just over the runway threshold, he reduced engine power back to flight idle. He landed the airplane on its "main [landing gear] wheels first" and slowly let the nose of the airplane drop. Although both main landing gear assemblies remained down and locked, the nose landing gear collapsed, allowing the nose of the airplane and both propellers to strike the runway. The airplane slid approximately 3,000 feet, coming to a stop on the right edge of the runway. When the propellers struck the runway, several fractured propeller pieces impacted the left and right sides of the fuselage resulting in substantial damage to two fuselage bulkheads. The fuselage bulkhead, forward of the nose landing gear well, was also substantially damaged due to contact with the runway. The pilot said that, during the approach, from base to final, he did not hear a landing gear warning horn. The pilot stated that the flight was uneventful except for a problem on the previous leg of the flight from Denver International Airport (DEN), Denver, Colorado, to Garfield County Regional Airport (RIL), Rifle, Colorado. During the previous leg, the airplane's "out of trim" warning buzzer came on as he climbed through 16,000 feet msl. He said that it stayed on during the entire flight while at flight level 180 (18,000 feet msl). As he descended through 14,000 feet msl, the warning buzzer turned off. According to an air traffic control specialist, who was working in the Walker Field/Grand Junction Airport Control Tower, he told N332BA to enter a left base for runway 11 and that he was cleared to land. He stated that he observed N332BA roll out on a 2-mile final "with the gear down." As the airplane was rolling down the runway the "nose wheel collapsed." According to another pilot, who had flown N332BA on November 11, 2003, he had problems extending the landing gear while on approach to DEN. On the fourth try, the landing gear extended and locked, and he was able to land. According to the pilot, maintenance personnel examined the airplane that evening. The landing gear was cycled several times. No deficiencies were noted. On December 12, 2003, two FAA maintenance inspectors examined N332BA. Several extension and retraction test were completed while the airplane was in a hanger, on aircraft maintenance jacks, and connected to ground hydraulic power. The landing gear extended and retracted properly. Furthermore, an uneventful free-fall test was completed as well. The FAA inspector stated that, although the landing gear preformed as normal on the first series of tests, he was able to duplicate the nose gear extension failure by manipulating the landing gear's "bypass-valve." Upon examination of the nose landing gear's up-lock mechanism, he noted that it was not properly lubricated in accordance with the Fairchild SA226 Maintenance Manual. Further examination of the nose landing gear assembly revealed that a "critical clearance," between the nose landing gear's bell crank roller and positioning cam, measured in accordance with the Fairchild SA226 Maintenance Manual, was found to be out of tolerance. After properly servicing the up-lock mechanism, the gear problem could no longer be duplicated. The FAA inspector also stated that, during the operation of the landing gear, the engine throttles were advanced to keep the landing gear warning horn from constantly sounding. At one point, when the throttles were retarded, the landing gear warning horn did activate, but it was "barely audible." It was noted that, when moving the throttles fore and aft, the buzz, of the landing gear warning horn, was intermittently below reasonable hearing volume. According to the Fairchild SA226 Maintenance Manual, the landing gear should be lubed every 200 hours. The FAA inspector stated that the approved maintenance inspection sheet for Key Lime Air, did not show the requirement for the main landing gear or nose landing gear to be lubed every 200 hours. According to the pilot, he was told to enter left base and was cleared to land. The pilot stated that, when he reduced the airspeed to lower the landing gear, he "heard the gear come down," and he verified "three green in the [landing] gear indicator." He landed the airplane on its "main [landing gear] wheels first" and slowly let the nose of the airplane drop. Although both main landing gear assemblies remained down and locked, the nose landing gear collapsed, allowing the nose of the airplane and both propellers to strike the runway. The airplane slid approximately 3,000 feet, coming to a stop on the right edge of the runway. Several fractured propeller pieces impacted the left and right sides of the fuselage substantially damaging two fuselage station bulkheads. The fuselage bulkhead, forward of the nose landing gear well, was also substantially damaged due to contact with the runway. The pilot said that, during the approach, from base to final, he did not hear a landing gear warning horn. An air traffic control specialist, stated that he told the pilot to enter a left base and that he was cleared to land. The specialist stated that he observed the airplane roll out on a 2-mile final "with the gear down." As the airplane was rolling down the runway the "nose wheel collapsed." An FAA inspector examined the airplane and noted that, according to the Fairchild SA226 Maintenance Manual, the nose landing gear's up-lock mechanism was not properly lubricated, a "critical clearance" measurement between the nose landing gear's bell crank roller and positioning cam was found to be out of tolerance, and when the throttles were retarded, the landing gear warning horn activated, but it was "barely audible." According to the Fairchild SA226 Maintenance Manual, the landing gear should be lubed every 200 hours. The FAA inspector stated that the approved maintenance inspection sheet for the operator, did not show the requirement for the main landing gear or nose landing gear to be lubed every 200 hours. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2003_DEN04LA023.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Faculty research project Reconfigurable Guidance and Control Systems for Emerging On-Orbit Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing (OSAM) Space Vehicles
Dynamic response to emergent situations is a necessity in the on-orbit servicing, assembly, and manufacturing (OSAM) field, because traditional on-orbit guidance and control (G&C) cannot respond effic…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2019 · Journal article (IJAAA) Satellite Maintenance: An Opportunity to Minimize the Kessler Effect
Recently, there has been an emphasis on the growing problem of orbital debris. While the advantages of placing satellites into space are numerous, advances in satellite technology combined with the gr…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2015 · Conference paper The Implementation of Safety Management Systems in Maintenance Operations
Literature for Safety Management Systems (SMS) that apply to flight operations is abundant, but there is a limited supply of SMS-related literature for maintenance operations.
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Enabling Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight Drones Operation over Open RAN 5G Networks with Slicing
Among the foretold claims of the transition from 5G to 6G, Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight (BVLoS) drone operation has emerged as a prominent Internet-of-Robots enabler.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR) Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…