DEN04LA145
2004-09-17 · Aspen, Colorado, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport ASE
Current FAA registration · N214B
- Make / Model
- BELL 214B-1
- Year of manufacture
- 1978 · 26 years old at event
- Engine
- LYCOMING T-55 SER TS (2650 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 16 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 20020401
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A1C877
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the inadvertent activation of the engine's fuel shut off valve, resulting in the reduction of engine power to 50 percent due to an improper cannon plug wire repair on the engine's wire harness assembly. Contributing factors include the improper wire repair, the low altitude, and the lack of suitable terrain for a forced landing.
Factual narrative
On September 17, 2004, at approximately 1300 mountain daylight time, a Bell 214B-1, N214B, operated by Central Copters, Inc., was substantially damaged during a forced landing following a loss of engine power near Aspen, Colorado. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The local flight was being conducted under the provisions of Title 14 CFR Part 91 without a flight plan. The commercial certificated pilot was not injured. The flight was originating at the time of the accident. According to the pilot, he was departing a staging area on the side of a ski slope. As he brought the helicopter to a hover at approximately 90 feet agl, he felt a "slight shudder" as the engine experienced a compressor stall. He stated that the engine rpm dropped to idle and he noticed the fuel flow had dropped to "idle fuel flow." He turned the helicopter downhill and attempted a forced landing on a nearby ski slope. The helicopter struck the ground with its nose, slid approximately 30 feet, and rolled over on its left side. The impact crushed the forward section of the fuselage, buckled the tail boom, and separated the vertical fin, tail rotor assembly, and both landing gear skids. The engine continued to run at idle after the helicopter came to rest. On November 3, 2004, the engine was examined and functionally tested. No pre-impact conditions were found that would have interfered with normal engine operation. The engine performed normally throughout the functional test and the test could not duplicate the loss of power condition as described by the pilot. On April 26, 2005, a maintenance technician completed a serviceability inspection of the engine's wire harness assembly. The wire harness assembly, which connects the airframe to various engine components, was in "very poor condition with bare wires showing, plugs in deteriorated condition [and] with o-rings missing." The harness was not in a "serviceable condition." During the inspection, he identified a broken cannon plug wire. The broken wire was identified as the lead wire for pin B in the engine's overspeed trip system cannon plug. Upon further inspection, he noted that, on the same cannon plug, the lead wire for pin A broke free with very little effort. The two cannon plug wires were identified as the primary power and ground wires for the engine's overspeed control unit. An examination of the cannon plug revealed that the wire had been repaired with a solder joint. The original insulation between the sockets had been removed and the solder joints were covered with heat shrink tubing. The cannon plug (1P32, p/n PT06CP-8-4S) is a "crimp type" cannon plug, which requires crimp pins. Soldering is not allowed due to the close tolerance of the pins. A bench test was conducted on the wire harness, in which power was applied and then removed. The technician stated that "no false triggers of the fuel [shut-off] valve" were noted. According to the technician, the broken wire condition, in itself, would not engage the overspeed system or result in the loss of engine power. However, it was noted that the broken cannon plug wire was next to the lead wire for pin C, which is connected directly to the engine's overspeed fuel shut-off valve. Movement of the broken wire could enable the solder joint on pin B to touch pin C, which could inadvertently activate the fuel shut-off valve. During a second bench test, the technician stated that he "shorted pin B to pin C." This shorted condition resulted in the inadvertent activation of the fuel shut-off valve, which resulted in the reduction of engine power to approximately 50 percent. No further system or airframe anomalies were noted. According to the pilot, as he brought the helicopter to a 90-foot hover, he felt a "slight shudder" as the engine experienced a compressor stall. He stated that the engine rpm dropped to idle and he noticed the fuel flow had dropped to "idle fuel flow." He turned the helicopter downhill and attempted a forced landing on a nearby ski slope. The helicopter struck the ground with its nose, slid approximately 30 feet, and rolled over on its left side. The impact crushed the forward section of the fuselage, buckled the tail boom, and separated the vertical fin, tail rotor assembly, and both landing gear skids. The engine continued to run at idle after the helicopter came to rest. During a serviceability inspection of the engine's wire harness, a broken wire was located in the overspeed control unit's cannon plug. The wire in the "crimp type" cannon plug had been repaired with a solder joint, which is not allowed due to the close tolerance of the pins. According to the technician, the broken wire condition, in itself, would not engage the overspeed system or result in the loss of engine power. However, it was noted that, due to the close tolerance of the pins, any movement of the broken wire could enable the solder joint on one pin to touch the other pin. During a bench test, the technician stated that he "shorted pin B to pin C." This shorted condition resulted in the inadvertent activation of the fuel shut-off valve, which would result in the reduction of engine power to approximately 50 percent. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2004_DEN04LA145.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.