NTSB CAROL · Event
Event DFW07LA105
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's failure to maintain control of the airplane during a short-field takeoff, which resulted in an inadvertent stall.
Factual narrative
On May 5, 2007, at 0850 eastern daylight time, a single-engine Aviat A-1A airplane, N16HY, was substantially damaged when it impacted terrain shortly after takeoff from Runway 01 at the Republic Airport (KFRG), near Farmingdale, New York. The commercial pilot was seriously injured and the passenger sustained minor injuries. The airplane was registered to Air Transport Service, LLC, of Wilmington, Delaware, and operated by the pilot. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed for the local flight conducted under 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. In a written statement, the pilot stated that he requested a short field, "immediate left downwind departure" from air traffic control. While climbing, the engine's manifold pressure and RPM dropped without warning. The engine lost "significant" power, the "nose went down", and he attempted to land on the runway. In a telephone interview, the pilot stated that prior to the flight he calculated the airplane's weight and balance to be 15 to 20 pounds under gross weight and performed a pre-flight inspection of the airplane. He then boarded his passenger, started the engine and taxied the airplane to Runway 01(a 5,516-foot-long and 150-foot-wide asphalt runway). The pilot reported that everything was operating normally, and he elected to execute a short-field takeoff. Once the airplane became airborne, he pitched the nose-up to establish a climb airspeed of 55 knots. When asked what the stall speed of the airplane was, the pilot replied that it was between 47 and 51 knots and the best angle of climb speed (Vx) was between 55 and 60 knots. He added that when the airplane reached an altitude of about 100 to 200 feet above the runway, the engine RPM dropped and "things happened fast" as the airspeed decreased. The pilot further stated that he got concerned that the airplane would "slide back on its tail since he was out of the performance parameters of the aircraft." Subsequently, the nose of the airplane dropped toward the ground and the airplane impacted the runway. The pilot declared that he made every effort to recover the airplane; however, he did not have enough altitude to fully recover. In addition, he said that there was an initial drop in engine power (he thought maybe due to a magneto dropping off line), but it came back and the engine was operating at the time of impact. He also could not recall if he had retracted the flaps; however, he did say that if he had retracted the flaps it would have "exacerbated" the "situation." A witness, who was a flight instructor, was standing on the airport ramp near the main terminal building when he saw the airplane takeoff. He reported that the airplane was in an "extreme nose high attitude" and he never saw the pilot make an attempt to lower the nose. When the airplane reached an altitude of 50-75 feet above the runway, the left wing dropped followed by the nose of the airplane and it impacted the ground. A Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) safety inspector performed an on-scene examination of the airplane. According to the inspector, the airplane came to rest in the upright position on the west side of the runway near the 1,020-foot fixed-distance marks. The initial impact point was a series of four slash marks on the runway surface just prior to where the airplane came to rest. Examination of the airplane revealed that the elevator trim tab was positioned one-quarter of a turn from neutral towards the nose down position. According to the airplane's Flight Manual, the tab should be set halfway between neutral and full nose-up for a high performance takeoff. The flaps were found in the zero-degree (fully retracted) position. In addition, the published stall speed for the airplane with flaps (power on) was 33 miles per hour (mph) (29 knots). A review of the aircraft logbooks revealed the last annual inspection was completed on April 1, 2006. As per Federal Regulations, the airplane was required to have an annual inspection to be considered airworthy. The pilot held a commercial pilot certificate for airplane single-engine and multi-engine land, and instrument airplane. He reported having accumulated a total of 1,846 hours, of which, 42 hours were in the same make and model aircraft. His last second class FAA medical was issued on December 1, 2006. The airplane stalled during initial takeoff climb as the pilot was performing a simulated short field takeoff. The pilot/owner boarded his passenger, started the airplane, and taxied to a 5,516-foot-long by 150-foot-wide asphalt runway. The pilot elected to perform a short-field takeoff. Once the airplane became airborne, the pilot established a pronounced nose-high attitude as he attempted to establish a climb airspeed of 55 knots. The pilot was under the impression that the stall speed of the airplane was between 47 and 51 knots and the best angle of climb speed (Vx) was between 55 and 60 knots. The pilot added that when the airplane reached an altitude of 100 to 200 feet above the runway, the engine RPM dropped and the airspeed decreased. The airplane stalled and the nose of the airplane dropped toward the ground, impacting the runway. A witness, who was a flight instructor, was standing on the airport ramp near the main terminal building when he saw the airplane takeoff. He said the airplane was in an "extreme nose high attitude" and he never saw the pilot make an attempt to lower the nose. Examination of the airplane revealed that the airplane came to rest upright on the west side of the runway near the 1,020-foot fixed-distance marks on the runway. The initial impact point was a series of four slash marks on the runway surface just prior to where the airplane came to rest. The flaps were found in the zero-degree (fully retracted) position and the elevator trim tab was positioned one-quarter of a turn from neutral towards the nose down position. According to the airplane's Flight Manual, the tab should be set halfway between neutral and full nose-up for a high performance takeoff. In addition, the published stall speed for the airplane with flaps (power on) was 33 miles per hour (mph) (29 knots). Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2007_DFW07LA105.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint
Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (JAAER)
Analysis on the Negative Emotional, Physiological, and Cognitive Responses Elicited from of the Activation of a Stall Alarm
Failing to identify an aerodynamic stall can lead to the inability of an aircraft to sustain flight. To warn pilots of an impending or fully-developed stall, many aircraft have safety devices installe…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗