ERA10LA146
2010-02-18 · Carthage, North Carolina, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport SOP
Current FAA registration · N731DS
- Make / Model
- CESSNA P210N
- Year of manufacture
- 1979 · 31 years old at event
- Engine
- CONT MOTOR TSIO-520 SER (300 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 6 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19791221
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A9CF1E
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A total loss of engine power during the initial climb after takeoff for undetermined reasons.
Factual narrative
On February 18, 2010, about 1500 eastern standard time, a Cessna P210N, N731DS, was substantially damaged during a forced landing, after it experienced a total loss of engine power during the initial climb after takeoff from Moore County Airport (SOP), Carthage, North Carolina. The certificated private pilot sustained minor injuries. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan had been filed for the personal flight that was conducted under 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. The pilot reported that the engine started normally, and did not experience any discrepancies during pretakeoff checks. He subsequently departed from runway 23, a 5,503-foot-long, by 150-foot-wide, asphalt runway, with the intention of remaining in the local area to practice approaches, and touch and go landings. As the airplane climbed to approximately 50 to 60 feet above the ground, the engine "coughed" and seemed to experience a loss of power for about 10 seconds. Shortly thereafter, the engine experienced a total loss of power. The airplane subsequently touched down on a grassy area located beyond the runway and entered a ditch. The airplane's nose gear separated, and the left wing contacted the ground which resulted in spar damage to the outboard 3 to 4 feet. The airplane was equipped with a Teledyne Continental Motors TSIO-520-P6B series engine. Examination of the engine by a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector did not reveal any catastrophic mechanical malfunctions. Examination of the fuel system did not reveal any contamination; however, fuel was observed in the air pressure line to the engine driven fuel pump. The fuel servo assembly, engine drive fuel pump, manifold assembly and fuel injectors were removed for further examination. The fuel system components were subsequently examined and tested at Teledyne Continental Motors, Mobile, Alabama, under the supervision of an FAA inspector. The examinations did not reveal any discrepancies which would have resulted in a total loss of engine power. An unidentified residue was noted on the fuel manifold screen and fuel nozzles. According to an NTSB Chemist, energy dispersive spectroscopy revealed that the residue was aluminum oxide. It was noted that the only aluminum component in the fuel system was the fuel manifold valve itself, and the amount of residue observed was not of sufficient quantity to affect fuel flow. Review of maintenance records revealed that the airplane had been operated for approximately 8 hours since its most recent annual inspection, which was performed on January 26, 2010. In addition, the engine had been operated for about 190 hours since it was overhauled during May 2006. The pilot reported 4,850 hours of total flight experience on his most recent application for an FAA third-class medical certificate, which was dated June 24, 2009. During the initial climb after takeoff, as the airplane climbed to an altitude of approximately 50 to 60 feet, it experienced a momentary loss of engine power, which was followed by a total loss of engine power. The airplane subsequently touched down on a grassy area located beyond the runway and encountered a ditch. The airplane's nose gear separated and the left wing was substantially damaged. Examination of the engine did not reveal any catastrophic mechanical malfunctions and fuel was present in the fuel system. Postaccident examination and testing of the airplane's fuel system did not reveal any mechanical malfunctions that would have resulted in a complete loss of engine power. The airplane had been operated for approximately 8 hours since its most recent annual inspection, which was performed about 1 month prior to the accident according to the airplane's maintenance records. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Not determined-Not determined-(general)-(general)-Unknown/Not determined - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2010_ERA10LA146.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…