ERA10LA438
2010-08-23 · Douglas, Georgia, United States · Serious · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport DQH
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A loss of engine power during takeoff due to fuel contamination. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's inadequate preflight inspection and inadequate maintenance of the fuel system.
Factual narrative
On August 23, 2010, about 1320 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-30, N8734Y, owned and operated by a private individual, was substantially damaged when it impacted terrain, during takeoff from Douglas Municipal Airport (DQH), Douglas, Georgia. The certificated airline transport pilot was seriously injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan had been filed for the local personal flight conducted under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. According to the owner, the airplane had been parked outside at DQH, and not flown for about 1 year. On July 7, 2010, an annual inspection was performed on the airplane, however, during a subsequent test-flight on July 25, the left engine "missed" and additional maintenance was performed, which included "flushing the fuel tanks and cleaning the fuel lines to each respective flow divider." On the date of the accident, the pilot intended to fly the airplane to Florida, where the owner planned to sell it. According to the pilot, during the preflight inspection, he observed water in the airplane's main fuel tanks, and debris in the right wingtip fuel tank. During two subsequent ground-runs, both engines had periods of rough running operation and unidentifiable debris was observed in the fuel injectors. A third ground-run was conducted without any anomalies noted, and the pilot intended to conduct a test-flight in the airport traffic pattern. After normal preflight checks, the pilot attempted to depart from runway 22, a 6,000-foot-long, 100-foot-wide, asphalt runway. During the takeoff roll, the right engine rpm exceeded redline on a digital rpm gauge. The pilot adjusted the engine power and continued with the takeoff. The airplane lifted off the runway and was accelerating in ground effect, when the left engine began to run rough. The pilot believed that there was insufficient runway remaining to land and stop on the runway. He attempted to climb; however, the airplane began to settle and slowly yaw to the left. The airplane subsequently impacted trees, and came to rest about a 1/4-mile southwest of the airport. The airplane sustained substantial damage to both wings, the fuselage, and empennage. The airplane was equipped with two Lycoming IO-360-C1C series engines. The position of the wreckage precluded examination at the accident site. Subsequent examination of the wreckage conducted by representatives of the airframe and engine manufacturers, under the supervision of a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector revealed the presence of water and corrosion in the fuel distribution system. Water was observed in both of the main fuel tank strainers and the left engine fuel injector. In addition, fuel that was drained from the airplane by recovery personnel contained water and unidentified debris. No additional anomalies were noted, which would have prevented normal engine operation. According to fuel records, the airplane was "topped-off" with 30 gallons of 100-low-lead aviation gasoline on the morning of the accident. Three airplanes were refueled on the day prior to the accident, and one airplane was refueled after the accident airplane. The airport manager reported that he specifically contacted the owners and/or pilots of those airplanes, and they reported that they did not experience any fuel related problems. The pilot reported 3,465 hours of total flight experience, which included 3,297 hours in rotorcraft, 141 hours in single-engine airplanes, and 22 hours in multiengine airplanes. The pilot had no previous experience in the same make and model as the accident airplane beyond the test flight that was performed in July, and the accident flight. The airplane had been parked outside and not flown for about 1 year, except for a test flight conducted about 1 month prior to the accident. During a preflight inspection, the pilot observed water in the airplane's main fuel tanks, and debris in the right wingtip fuel tank. A series of engine ground run-ups and maintenance was conducted prior to the pilot attempting a test-flight. The airplane subsequently experienced a rough running left engine during the takeoff and impacted trees. Postaccident inspection of the airplane revealed the presence of water and corrosion in the fuel distribution system. Water was observed in both of the main fuel tank strainers and the left engine fuel injector. In addition, fuel drained from the airplane by recovery personnel contained water and unidentified debris. An annual inspection was performed on the airplane about 6 weeks prior to the accident, and additional maintenance was performed, which included flushing the fuel tanks and cleaning the fuel lines to each respective flow divider after the left engine "missed" during the test flight conducted about 1 month prior. The pilot had only accumulated about 22 hours of multiengine flight experience and lacked experience in the make and model of the accident airplane. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Aircraft-Fluids/misc hardware-Fluids-Fuel-Fluid condition - C
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Inspection-Preflight inspection-Pilot - C
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Maintenance-Scheduled/routine maintenance-Maintenance personnel - C
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Inspection-Scheduled/routine inspection-Maintenance personnel - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2010_ERA10LA438.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (fuel contamination, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…