ERA11CA396
2011-07-10 · Plant City, Florida, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport PCM
N325EE has since been reassigned. It is now registered to a different aircraft (ZIPLINE INTERNATIONAL INC P2 ZIP), which was not involved in this event.
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The failure of a screw in the nose landing gear aligner assembly for undetermined reasons, which prevented the landing gear from fully extending.
Factual narrative
The pilot stated that he departed and proceeded to a nearby airport where he performed 6 touch-and-go landings followed by one full-stop landing; all were uneventful. The flight departed to return and after lowering the landing gear using the normal system, there were no landing gear down and locked indications. Additionally, the landing gear circuit breaker (CB) tripped. He reset the CB, raised then lowered the landing gear; however, the landing gear failed to fully extend and the landing gear CB tripped again. Attempts to extend or retract the landing gear using the emergency extension lever in accordance with the Pilot’s Operating Handbook, and also G-loading were unsuccessful. Guidance from maintenance personnel was also unsuccessful in lowering the landing gear. He performed a fly-by and was informed that the landing gear appeared to be partially extended. The pilot returned for landing and on short final had the passenger get in the back of the airplane as the airplane did not have shoulder harnesses. The cabin entry door was opened slightly, the fuel and master were turned off, and the mixture controls were placed to idle-cutoff.At touchdown, the right gear collapsed, followed by the left, then the nose. The airplane came to rest on the runway right of center line and both evacuated the airplane. Postaccident inspection of the nose landing gear by an FAA inspector revealed a screw part number (P/N) 411 349 was broken off in the first thread of the bellcrank assembly P/N 21708-00. The head of the screw, bushing P/N 14976-15, and bushing P/N 14976-16 were separated and not located. No determination was made as to the reason for the fractured screw. Piper Aircraft personnel reported there have been no service difficult reports pertaining to the screw. The pilot stated that he departed and proceeded to a nearby airport where he performed six touch-and-go takeoffs and landings followed by one full-stop landing, all of which were uneventful. Before landing during the return flight, the pilot lowered the landing gear lever and observed that there were no landing gear down-and-locked indications and that the landing gear circuit breaker (CB) was tripped. The pilot reset the CB and attempted to raise then lower the landing gear; however, the landing gear failed to fully extend, and the landing gear CB tripped again. Attempts to extend the landing gear using the emergency extension lever in accordance with the Pilot’s Operating Handbook, using G-loading, and following guidance from maintenance personnel were unsuccessful. The pilot performed a fly-by and was informed that the landing gear appeared to be partially extended. The pilot turned off the fuel and master and placed the mixture controls to idle-cutoff. At touchdown, the right main landing gear collapsed, followed by the left, then the nose. The airplane came to rest on the runway. Postaccident examination of the nose landing gear revealed that a screw was broken off in the first thread of the nose landing gear aligner assembly. The head of the screw and associated bushings were separated and not located. No determination was made for the reason for the fractured screw. The manufacturer’s assessment indicated there have been no service difficulty reports pertaining to the screw. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Gear extension and retract sys-Malfunction - C
- — Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Nose/tail landing gear-Failure
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2011_ERA11CA396.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…