ERA11IA521
2011-09-18 · New Haven, Connecticut, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport HVN
Current FAA registration · N275BM
- Make / Model
- BEECH V35
- Year of manufacture
- 1966 · 45 years old at event
- Engine
- CONT MOTOR IO 520 SERIES (285 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 6 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19660609
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A2B934
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The in-flight fatigue failure of the engine’s crankshaft, which resulted in the separation of the forward portion of the crankshaft and the propeller.
Factual narrative
On September 18, 2011, about 1035 eastern daylight time, a Beech V35, N275BM, operated by a commercial pilot, sustained minor damage during a forced landing, following a total loss of engine power shortly after takeoff from the Tweed-New Haven Airport (HVN), New Haven, Connecticut. The certificated commercial pilot and a passenger were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and an instrument flight rules flight plan was filed for the personal flight that was conducted under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. According to the pilot, the airplane departed HVN and began to climb without incident. As the airplane approached 6,000 feet mean sea level, the pilot felt a shutter and slight change in engine rpm. A few seconds later, he experienced oil on the windscreen, smoke, and engine roughness, followed by a total loss of engine power. The pilot declared an emergency and was able to return to HVN to perform a forced landing to runway 14. During the landing, the airplane sustained minor nose gear damage when it overran the runway about 50 feet, and came to rest in weeds. The airplane was powered by a Teledyne Continental Motors IO-550-B83, 300-horsepower engine, equipped with a three-bladed Hartzell constant-speed propeller. Examination of the airplane by a Federal Aviation Administration inspector revealed that the propeller and forward portion of the crankshaft, aft of the propeller mounting flange, separated inflight and was subsequently located in a wooded area. The engine and the separated portion of the crankshaft were retained for further examination. A teardown of the engine conducted at Continental Motors Inc., Mobile, Alabama, under the supervision of an NTSB investigator, revealed that the crankshaft and counterweight assembly exhibited lubrication distress, thermal damage, and mechanical damage on all six connecting rod journals. The crankshaft was fractured in two-pieces across the No. 4 main journal. The crankcase main bearing supports adjacent to the fracture exhibited fretting signatures and lock-slot elongation. The No. 4 main bearing was extruded, with portions found in the oil sump. Metallurgical examination of the fractured crankshaft revealed cracks initiated on the bearing surface near an oil transfer tube and propagated in fatigue. Cracks were also identified on the bearing fillet radius. At the time of the incident, the airplane had been operated for about 5,470 total hours, and 14 hours since its most recent annual inspection, which was performed on August 11, 2011. The engine was manufactured during November 2006, and had been operated for about 910 total hours. In addition, the engine had been operated for about 500 hours since maintenance was performed that included the reinstallation of the Nos. 2 and 4 cylinders after repair, on February 17, 2009. During the climb after takeoff, as the airplane approached 6,000 feet mean sea level, the crankshaft fractured, and the airplane experienced a total loss of engine power. The forward portion of the crankshaft, with the propeller attached, departed the engine. The pilot declared an emergency and returned to the departure airport where he performed a forced landing on a runway. The airplane sustained minor nose gear damage when it overran the runway. Examination of the crankshaft revealed that it was fractured across the No. 4 main journal. Metallurgical examination revealed cracks that initiated on the bearing surface near an oil transfer tube and propagated in fatigue. At the time of the incident, the engine had been operated for about 910 total hours, about 500 hours of which had occurred since maintenance, which was performed about 2 1/2 years before the incident and included the reinstallation of the Nos. 2 and 4 cylinders. The crankcase adjacent to the fractured portion of the crankshaft showed significant fretting on the mating surfaces, possibly due to incorrect torque applied during the previous cylinder repair; however, the investigation could not determine the relevance of that repair, if any, due to the time that had elapsed since the repair was completed. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Engine (reciprocating)-Recip eng front section-Fatigue/wear/corrosion - C
- — Aircraft-Aircraft propeller/rotor-Propeller system-Propeller assembly-Not specified
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2011_ERA11IA521.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.