NTSB CAROL · Event
Event ERA11LA221
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The failure of the nose landing gear due to inadequate servicing of the nose gear strut reservoir.
Factual narrative
On April 1, 2011, at 1545 eastern daylight time, a Cessna 310F, N6781X, registered to a private individual, incurred substantial damage to the fuselage after the nose gear collapsed during landing rollout at Sanford Orlando International Airport (SFB), Sanford, Florida. The certified flight instructor (CFI) and his private pilot-rated dual student were not injured. The instructional flight was conducted under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed. The flight originated from SFB at 1500. The CFI reported that after takeoff, while retracting the landing gear, a loud “bang” was heard. It was assumed by the CFI that the noise came from the landing gear doors closing into each other. The gear-up light illuminated indicating that the landing gear were retracted and the doors were closed. The flight returned to SFB for two planned landings; first a touch-and-go and then a full stop. On the first landing; the gear were extended and a gear-down light illuminated. A touch-and-go was conducted without incident. Upon extending the gear for the second landing, the gear-down light failed to illuminate. The landing gear were recycled, and the gear light gave a gear-up indication. Another gear extension was attempted, and a gear-down indication was not received. The CFI contacted the SFB tower to request a low fly-by for a visual inspection of the gear position. The tower controller reported all three gear were down and the airplane was cleared to land. The touchdown on the main gear was normal; but as weight was applied to the nose wheel, the nose gear collapsed. The airplane was examined by a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector under the direction of a NTSB investigator. The airplane was raised using aircraft jacks to take the weight off of the wheels. The nose gear shock strut trunnion assembly remained in the compressed position. Approximately one inch of the strut trunnion surface was visible. An attempt to retract the nose landing gear was unsuccessful, due to the strut fork assembly coming into contact with the nose landing gear door attachment brackets. The nose strut trunnion was manually extended out of the cylinder until approximately three inches of the piston surface was visible. The nose landing gear assembly was then manually raised up into the wheel well area and fully retracted. The nose landing gear strut trunnion reservoir was checked for air pressure and was totally empty of air. The strut trunnion reservoir was checked for fluid which was found to be very low. There were no signs of fluid leakage around the nose landing gear strut trunnion. A review of the maintenance logbooks did not reveal any prior discrepancies with the nose landing gear assembly. The flight instructor and private pilot were performing touch-and-go landings. While retracting the landing gear, they heard a loud bang. The gear-up light illuminated, indicating that all three landing gears were retracted and the doors were closed. The instructor concluded that the noise came from the landing gear doors closing into each other. The flight continued, and two more landings were planned: one touch-and-go and one full stop. The landing gear appeared to operate normally during the touch-and-go. Upon extending the gear for the full stop landing, the gear-down light failed to illuminate. After checking the gear down indicating system, a visual check with the tower controllers confirmed that all three landing gears were in the down position. During touchdown, the nose gear collapsed. A postaccident examination of the nose gear assembly revealed that the nose landing gear strut reservoir lacked air pressure and the fluid level was very low. This underserviced condition caused binding in the nose gear fork assembly and failure of a nose gear push rod, which prevented the nose gear from extending to the full down and locked position. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Nose/tail gear strut/axle-Incorrect service/maintenance - C
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Maintenance-Scheduled/routine maintenance-Other/unknown - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Gear extension and retract sys-Failure - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2011_ERA11LA221.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Faculty research project
Reconfigurable Guidance and Control Systems for Emerging On-Orbit Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing (OSAM) Space Vehicles
Dynamic response to emergent situations is a necessity in the on-orbit servicing, assembly, and manufacturing (OSAM) field, because traditional on-orbit guidance and control (G&C) cannot respond effic…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2019 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Satellite Maintenance: An Opportunity to Minimize the Kessler Effect
Recently, there has been an emphasis on the growing problem of orbital debris. While the advantages of placing satellites into space are numerous, advances in satellite technology combined with the gr…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2015 · Conference paper
The Implementation of Safety Management Systems in Maintenance Operations
Literature for Safety Management Systems (SMS) that apply to flight operations is abundant, but there is a limited supply of SMS-related literature for maintenance operations.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA)
From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR)
Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint
Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for UAV-Assisted 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Study of MAPPO, MADDPG, and MADQN
The growing demand for robust, scalable wireless networks in the 5G-and-beyond era has led to the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as mobile base stations to enhance coverage in dense urb…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗