ERA12IA237
2012-03-14 · Warrenton, Virginia, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport HWY
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
Maintenance personnel's failure to identify stress corrosion cracking in the stabilator control cable during the most recent inspection, and the subsequent failure of the cable on the flight after the inspection.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHT
On March 14, 2012, about 1545 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-32R-300, N1358H, experienced a loss of elevator control while landing at Warrenton-Fauquier Airport (HWY), Warrenton, Virginia. The airplane was not damaged. The certificated commercial pilot and the certificated flight instructor were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed for the instructional flight, which departed Manassas Regional Airport (HEF), Manassas, Virginia about 1505. The flight was operated under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations part 91. The commercial pilot stated that they departed HEF to the west in order to conduct practice maneuvers in a local practice area. After completing the maneuvers, they departed the practice area to conduct takeoffs and landings at HWY. The pilot conducted one landing, and stated that the approach for the second landing was normal, but "slightly high." During the landing flare, the pilot heard a "boom," the airplane's nose dropped, and the airplane contacted the runway. Examination of the airplane revealed that the lower stabilator control cable turnbuckle had fractured. The turnbuckle (manufactured by Bell-Memphis Inc.) and cable were sent to the NTSB Materials Laboratory for further examination. The examination revealed that the turnbuckle fractured in the chamfered transition region between the shank and the wrench flats. The fracture surface was rough with crack branching consistent with stress corrosion cracking. The stainless steel turnbuckle assembly also exhibited areas of corrosion. The airplane's most recent annual inspection was completed on March 13, 2012. The accident flight was the airplane's first flight since the inspection. According to the maintenance logbook entry for the annual inspection, the airframe inspection was conducted in accordance with the Piper PA32R-300 inspection report. The Piper PA32R-300 inspection report details every component that should be checked on the airframe during an annual inspection. Item 28, under the Fuselage and Empennage Group states, "Inspect all aileron, rudder, stabilator, and stabilator trim cables; and cable terminals, turnbuckles, guides, fittings, and pulleys for safety, condition, and operation." The NTSB issued safety recommendations A-01-6 through A-01-8 in April 2001 to the FAA, suggesting remedial action for the failure of Bell-Memphis stainless steel turnbuckles from chloride-assisted transgranular stress corrosion cracking. The recommendations noted the previous failure of control cable turnbuckles and recommended issuance of an airworthiness directive to require inspections of affected aircraft. In response, the FAA issued a Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin (SAIB) in November 2001 (SAIB number CE-02-05) recommending the inspections of all aircraft with 303SE stainless steel turnbuckles installed, and advised operators of corrosion and cracking being experienced with control cable terminals. The bulletin recommended inspection of flight control cables and replacement of any cables showing signs of corrosion or cracking. Additionally, Piper issued a maintenance alert service letter (dated March 31, 2003), which noted that corrosion may be found on control cable attachment fittings; especially in airplanes which were in service for 15 years or more. The service letter recommended inspection of cable terminals, turnbuckles, and fittings for corrosion or cracking within the next 100 hours time in service, or to coincide with the next scheduled maintenance event. For airplanes in service for 15 years or more, the letter suggested the use of a 10X magnifier. Any evidence of corrosion or cracking was cause for replacement according to the service letter. The current revision of the airplane service manual (dated July 15, 2006) included the special control cable fitting inspection for airplanes in service 15 years or more, as outlined in the prior service letter. In January 2004, the FAA issued a revision to the 2001 SAIB, to include the use a magnifying glass for the corrosion inspections. An additional FAA SAIB (number CE-11-01), issued October 4, 2010, advised operators of specific failures related to the horizontal stabilator turnbuckle/control cable assembly on Piper airplanes. The SAIB recommended that operators incorporate the previously issued Piper service letter into their inspection procedures. It also noted that any evidence of corrosion or cracking was cause for replacement of the cable assembly. As referenced in the previously issued NTSB Safety Recommendations and the FAA SAIB, as of the date of this report, the NTSB is aware of 15 instances of turnbuckle failures. The breakdown of these failures is as follows: Piper PA-28 series aircraft: 8 failures Piper PA-32 series aircraft: 3 failures Piper PA-44 series aircraft: 3 failures Cessna 172: 1 failure On August 2, 2012, the FAA issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) indicating the intention to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) which would require inspections of the stabilator control system and replacement of parts as necessary. The AD would be applicable for PA-28, PA-32, PA-34, and PA-44 airplanes. During the landing flare, the pilot heard a "boom," the airplane's nose dropped, and the airplane contacted the runway. Examination of the airplane revealed that the lower stabilator control cable turnbuckle had fractured as a result of stress corrosion cracking. An annual inspection was completed on the airplane the day before the accident. According to the airframe logbook entry, the inspection was performed in accordance with the PA32R-300 inspection checklist, which required, in part, inspection of the stabilator cable terminals and turnbuckles. The NTSB issued recommendations in 2001 to the FAA regarding the failure of control cable turnbuckles and recommending issuance of an airworthiness directive to require inspections of affected aircraft. On August 2, 2012, the FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking indicating the intention to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) that would require inspections of the stabilator control system and replacement of parts as necessary. The AD would be applicable for PA-28, PA-32, PA-34, and PA-44 airplanes. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Flight control system-Stabilizer control system-Failure - C
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Maintenance-Scheduled/routine maintenance-Maintenance personnel - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Flight control system-Stabilizer control system-Inadequate inspection - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2012_ERA12IA237.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.