ERA12LA147
2012-01-16 · Huntington, West Virginia, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport HTS
Current FAA registration · N839EX
- Make / Model
- BOEING DHC-8-102
- Year of manufacture
- 1990 · 22 years old at event
- Engine
- P&W CANADA PW120 (1800 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 39 seats · 2 engines
- Last airworthiness date
- 19900803
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S AB7A43
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The inadequate communication among ground crew personnel, which resulted in the airplane’s collision with a deice truck.
Factual narrative
On January 16, 2012, about 0700 eastern standard time, a Boeing DHC-8-102, N839EX, registered to US Airways Express and operated by Piedmont Airlines as flight 4117, sustained substantial damage to the left horizontal stabilizer and elevator when it collided with a deicing truck while taxiing at Tri-State Airport (HTS), Huntington, West Virginia. The scheduled domestic passenger flight was conducted under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 121. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and an instrument flight rules flight plan had been filed. The 2 pilots, 1 flight attendant and 33 passengers were not injured. The flight was originating from HTS and was destined for Charlotte/Douglas International Airport, Charlotte, North Carolina. According to the Director of Safety for US Airways, HTS had recently changed from deicing on the gate to off-gate deicing. Prior to the airplane leaving the gate, the Captain spoke with the ramp agent, telling him that he would like to taxi out with one engine, and leave the engine in feather while the airport personnel (vendor) conducted the deicing. The ramp agent (1) then walked to the deice vehicle and conveyed the Captain's request, to which the vendor personnel agreed. The ramp agent (1) then went back to the airplane to confirm with the Captain that his plan was acceptable with the vendor. The ramp agent then said that he told the Captain to taxi out in front of Gate 2, but the Captain said he was told to taxi out in a non-specific manner. After the Captain started the #1 engine, an agent pulled the wheel chocks and then went inside to station operations to man the radio, while another agent marshalled the aircraft out of the Gate 1 parking area. Because of the proximity of another airline’s piece of equipment, the agent doing the marshalling then stood by the wing to ensure sufficient clearance, and gave thumbs up to the flight crew to signal that they were clear of the equipment. After the airplane taxied out and was positioned near gate 2, the Captain stopped the airplane and asked the First Officer (FO) to call station operations and clarify where they were to go for the deicing. The FO spoke with the ramp agent who was working the radio, but the agent could not see the airplane and did not realize the aircraft had left the gate. Assuming that the aircraft was still at the gate, the agent told the crew to taxi 50 feet or so and stop. Without the flight crew’s knowledge, the vendor’s deicing team misunderstood the agent’s thumbs up signal as the signal that deicing could begin. Consequently, the deicing team moved into a position behind the left wing and in front of the left horizontal tail when the aircraft first stopped, and started spraying the rear of the aircraft. Having received guidance from station operations to move 50 feet, the flight crew initiated taxiing and almost immediately felt a bump, then stopped. After seeing the aircraft start to move, the bucket operator yelled to the driver to "back up" and tried to lower the boom, but the aircraft tail had already struck the boom arm. According to the captain and the first officer, they were instructed to taxi the airplane to an unspecified deice area to remove frost from the airframe. As they taxied, a ground crewmember stood by the wing to ensure the airplane’s clearance from another airline’s equipment and signaled thumbs up to the flight crew to indicate when they were clear of the equipment. After taxiing a short distance, the flight crew stopped and awaited further instructions from a ramp agent on the radio for positioning the airplane. Unknown to the flight crew, the deicing team misunderstood the thumbs-up signal to mean that deicing could begin. Consequently, they moved into a position behind the airplane’s left wing and in front of the left horizontal tail. The ramp agent working the radio could not see the airplane from the radio location and, believing it was still at the gate, instructed the flight crew to taxi 50 feet and stop for deicing. The flight crew initiated taxiing and almost immediately felt a bump, colliding with the boom arm of the deice truck. They then stopped the airplane. The deice truck was not equipped for radio communication; therefore, the team’s movement and position could not be coordinated with the other ground personnel or flight crew. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Environmental issues-Operating environment-Communication system-Visual communication-Contributed to outcome - C
- C Personnel issues-Action/decision-Action-Incorrect action performance-Ground crew - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2012_ERA12LA147.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing). All research papers
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Enabling Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight Drones Operation over Open RAN 5G Networks with Slicing
Among the foretold claims of the transition from 5G to 6G, Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight (BVLoS) drone operation has emerged as a prominent Internet-of-Robots enabler.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR) Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for UAV-Assisted 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Study of MAPPO, MADDPG, and MADQN
The growing demand for robust, scalable wireless networks in the 5G-and-beyond era has led to the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as mobile base stations to enhance coverage in dense urb…
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Presentation NASA Icing Update – March 2025
This NASA Icing Update was prepared for presentation to the SAE International AC-9C Inflight Icing Technology Committee. This update includes the following topics: planned Rotational Icing Scaling tes…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER) A Mathematical Model on the Temporal Dynamics of Aviation Competitive Pricing
This study investigates the competitive dynamics of airport pricing using U.S. airport data to validate the findings. It employs linear and nonlinear ordinary differential equation models to analyze t…
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint An energy-stable phase-field model for droplet icing simulations
A phase-field model for three-phase flows is established by combining the Navier-Stokes (NS) and the energy equations, with the Allen-Cahn (AC) and Cahn-Hilliard (CH) equations and is demonstrated ana…