ERA13LA363
2013-08-04 · Tallahassee, Florida, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport TLH
Current FAA registration · N1034S
- Make / Model
- MOONEY M20R
- Year of manufacture
- 2006 · 7 years old at event
- Engine
- CONT MOTOR IO-550-G (280 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 2 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 20060731
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A012CE
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's failure to troubleshoot the in-flight electrical problem and restore power using the operable redundant battery and his decision not to manually extend the airplane's landing gear, which resulted in a gear-up landing. Contributing to the accident was an internal electrical short of the No. 2 battery, which resulted in a total loss of electrical power.
Factual narrative
On August 4, 2013, about 1210 eastern daylight time, a Mooney M20R, N1034S, was substantially damaged during a precautionary landing at Tallahassee Regional Airport (TLH), Tallahassee, Florida. The private pilot and passenger were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and the airplane was operating on an instrument flight rules (IFR) flight plan. The flight, which had originated from TLH about 1200, was destined for Bartow Municipal Airport (BOW), Bartow, Florida. The personal flight was conducted under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. After receiving his IFR clearance, the pilot departed from runway 36 at TLH. He contacted the departure air traffic controller shortly thereafter and was cleared to climb to 5,000 feet. As the airplane climbed through 2,500 feet it entered the clouds, and near 5,000 feet, the pilot reported hearing an "indescribable noise" in his headset. Immediately thereafter, the primary flight display and the multi-function display lost power. The pilot assumed that the total loss of electrical power was due to a short circuit, given the abrupt nature with which the power loss occurred. The pilot subsequently descended the airplane below the clouds, and once in visual meteorological conditions, used a portable electronic device to navigate back to TLH. During the return flight, the pilot was concerned about a possible electrical fire and smoke in the cockpit, and wanted to land the airplane as soon as possible. As such, he did not perform the emergency procedure for a manual extension of the airplane's electrically actuated landing gear. Upon reaching the airport, the pilot observed the green light gun signal from the air traffic control tower and landed the airplane on runway 36 with the landing gear retracted. The fuselage structure was substantially damaged during the landing. A Federal Aviation Administration inspector examined the airplane following the accident. The inspector powered up the airplane's electrical system normally utilizing the number 1 battery, and the primary flight display operated normally. The inspector noted that the number 2 battery was inoperative. The inspector also noted that the landing gear actuator circuit breaker was engaged (not tripped or pulled). The airplane's entire electrical system was subsequently examined in detail by a maintenance facility. No discrepancies were found with the system, with the exception of an internal electrical short of the number 2 battery. According to the electrical system description provided in the airplane's pilot operating handbook: Two 24-volt 10-ampere-hour storage batteries (in the tailcone) and one 100 ampere self-rectifying alternator (produces 99 amps) suppl[y] electrical power for equipment operation. The No. 1 battery, left side of the tailcone, is normally used as the primary to sustain the electrical system and to start the aircraft. The No. 2 battery, right side of the tailcone, is normally considered as a backup and is kept in a fully charged condition by trickle charge, through a diode system. Should the No. 1 battery be depleted to the point of being unable to supply adequate power for system needs, it may be de-selected from the system and the No. 2 battery selected on line by pushing the rocker switch marked BAT-1/BAT-2, on the circuit breaker panel, from the BAT-1 to BAT-2 position. The MASTER switch still controls battery power to the buss from either position. With the BAT-1/BAT-2 switch in the No. 2 position the No. 1 battery will be recharged (trickle charged) through the diode system. Alternate between #1 and #2 batteries, as desired, to keep both active. The emergency procedure for a suspected fire in-flight stated: Master Switch OFF Alternator Field Switch OFF Cabin Ventilation OPEN Heating Controls CLOSED
LAND AS SOON AS POSSIBLE
If electrical power is essential for flight, attempt to identify and isolate the faulty circuit as follows: Master Switch ON Alternator Field Switch ON Select ESSENTIAL switches ON one at a time; permit a short time to elapse before activating an additional circuit. The emergency procedure for a failure of the landing gear to extend electrically stated: Airspeed 140 KIAS or less Landing Gear Actuator Circuit Breaker PULL Landing Gear Switch DOWN Gear Manual Emergency Extension Mechanism LATCH FORWARD/LEVER BACK T-Handle PULL (12 to 20 times) and RETURN until gear is down and locked GEAR DOWN light ILLUMINATED; STOP when resistance is felt Visual Gear Down Indicator CHECK ALIGNMENT by viewing from directly above indicator Shortly after departing on an instrument flight rules flight, the airplane abruptly lost all electrical power while operating in instrument meteorological conditions. The pilot reported that, given the abrupt nature of the electrical power loss, he assumed that it was due to a short circuit; he did not troubleshoot the electrical problem. He then descended the airplane to visual meteorological conditions and used a portable electronic device to navigate back toward the departure airport. During the return flight, the pilot was concerned about a possible electrical fire and smoke in the cockpit and wanted to land the airplane as soon as possible; therefore, he chose not to perform the emergency procedure to manually extend the airplane's electrically actuated landing gear. Upon reaching the airport, he conducted a gear-up landing, which resulted in substantial damage to the fuselage. Postaccident examination of the airplane's electrical system found that the No. 2 battery was inoperable and that the total loss of electrical power was likely caused by an internal electrical short of the battery. When the electrical system's redundant (No. 1) battery was selected, the electrical system operated normally. It is likely that, if the pilot had attempted to troubleshoot or isolate the electrical problem, he could have restored electrical power, extended the landing gear normally, and executed a precautionary landing without damaging the airplane. Alternatively, he could have manually extended the landing gear. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Personnel issues-Action/decision-Action-Lack of action-Pilot - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Gear extension and retract sys-Not used/operated - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Electrical power system-(general)-Incorrect use/operation - C
- F Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Electrical power system-Battery/charger-Failure - F
- C Personnel issues-Action/decision-Info processing/decision-Decision making/judgment-Pilot - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2013_ERA13LA363.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…