NTSB CAROL · Event
Event ERA14LA199
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot’s failure to maintain airspeed while approaching the airport, which resulted in a stall/mush.
Factual narrative
On April 13, 2014, about 1542 eastern daylight time (EDT), an Aircraft Industries a.s. (formerly LET Aeronautical Works) L33 SOLO glider, N318BA, collided with terrain approximately 400 feet north-northeast of Crooked Creek Airport (7NC5), Bunn, North Carolina. The private pilot sustained serious injuries, and the glider was substantially damaged. The glider was registered to and operated by North Carolina Soaring Association, under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91 as a personal flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time and no flight plan was filed. The flight originated from 7NC5 about 1525 EDT. The pilot was towed aloft from runway 22 and released at approximately 2,000 feet mean sea level at a point approximately just over 1 mile northwest of 7NC5. The tow plane returned to 7NC5 and landed, then shortly thereafter, the tow plane pilot stated that the accident pilot reported that he was returning to 7NC5. The tow plane pilot asked him if he wanted another tow aloft since the flight was a short duration and he replied affirmative. Witnesses who were on 7NC5 reported hearing the pilot announce that he was entering the traffic pattern for a right downwind for runway 22. The witnesses looked towards that direction and noted the glider was abeam the approach end of runway 22 but noted the glider appeared to be low. The glider turned onto base leg where trees obscured one witnesses view; however, another witness reported seeing the glider through the trees and observed the glider in a nose-low angle greater than 50 degrees, then observed what appeared to be the wings rotate as if in a ground loop but at a higher angle. The witnesses heard an impact and ran to the accident site. On arrival they noted the pilot was being attended to by homeowners that lived near the airport. Fire rescue responded and the pilot was transported by ambulance to a nearby fire station, and then was airlifted to a hospital for treatment of his injuries. Copies of the witness statements are contained in the NTSB public docket. The accident site was located at 35 degrees 56 minutes 05 seconds North latitude and 078 degrees 14 minutes 32 seconds West longitude, or about 450 feet and 34 degrees from the approach end of runway 22. The wing was separated from the attach points of the fuselage; however, the 2 pins that secure each wing were in place. Postaccident inspection of the glider by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector-in-charge (IIC), as well as by the Chief Tow Pilot of the glider owner revealed no evidence of preimpact failure or malfunction of the flight controls for roll, pitch, yaw, and air brakes. The FAA-IIC reported that the air brakes in the wings were retracted, although there was no way to determine the position of the air brake handle at impact. The right wingtip was bent up, and the leading edge of the left wing was crushed aft. A portable GPS receiver was removed from the glider for safekeeping before FAA arrival. The GPS receiver was later sent to the NTSB Vehicle Recorder Division, located in Washington, D.C., for read-out. According to the NTSB Vehicle Recorder Division Specialist's GPS Device Factual Report, the data was downloaded without difficulty. Four sessions on the accident date were recorded, which included the accident flight. The downloaded data indicated that after being towed aloft, numerous changes in heading were noted. Plotting of the data revealed that between 1541:20, and 1541:35, the glider was north of the airport flying in an easterly direction consistent with a base leg, and slowed from 53 to 32 knots. The glider then flew in a southerly direction towards the airport, and between 1541:53 and 1541:57, the glider turned slightly to the right and the groundspeed decreased from 34 knots to 25 knots. The last recorded GPS target at 1541:57, was located at 35.93588 degrees North latitude and -78.2427 degrees West longitude. The accident site was located about 450 feet and 163 degrees from the last GPS target location. According to the Type Certificate Data Sheet, the empty weight is approximately 463 pounds. The pilot's weight per his last medical application on October 16, 2013, was reported to be 219 pounds. Based on the glider empty weight and the pilot's weight at his least medical, the approximate gross weight at the time of the accident was 682 pounds. According to the Flight Manual, the recommended approach speed with air brakes retracted is 49 knots indicated airspeed (KIAS). The stall speed chart in the Flight Manual indicates that at the approximate weight at the time of the accident, the stall speed is approximately 34 KIAS. Excerpts of the Flight Manual are contained in the NTSB public docket. An aviation surface observation taken at Triangle North Executive Airport (LHZ), Louisburg, North Carolina, on the day of the accident at 1535, or about 7 minutes before the accident, indicates the wind was from 160 degrees at 11 knots with gusts to 15 knots, the visibility was 10 statute miles, and scattered clouds existed at 5,500 and 7,000 feet. The temperature and dew point were 25 and 13 degrees Celsius, respectively, and the altimeter setting was 30.13 inches of Mercury. The accident site was located about 7 nautical miles and 142 degrees from LHZ. The glider was towed aloft and then released. Shortly after, the glider pilot radioed the towplane pilot and informed him that he was returning to the airport. Because of the short duration of the glider flight, the towplane pilot asked the glider pilot if he wanted to be towed aloft again, and he replied that he did. Witnesses on the ground reported observing the glider low on the downwind leg and then turning onto the base leg. Based on data from the onboard portable GPS receiver, the glider turned onto final approach and flew in a southerly direction toward the runway with its groundspeed decreasing from 34 to 25 knots during the last few seconds of the flight. The glider impacted the ground in a nose-low attitude, which caused the wing to separate. Postaccident examination of the glider found no evidence of a preimpact failure or malfunction of the flight controls or air brakes, and the air brakes were retracted. The published stall speed for the glider with the air brakes retracted is about 34 knots indicated airspeed. Although the indicated airspeed during the final portion of the flight could not be determined, the evidence indicates that the pilot likely failed to maintain adequate airspeed while approaching the airport, which resulted in a stall/mush. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Airspeed-Not attained/maintained - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Angle of attack-Capability exceeded - C
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Aircraft control-Pilot - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2014_ERA14LA199.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint
Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (JAAER)
Analysis on the Negative Emotional, Physiological, and Cognitive Responses Elicited from of the Activation of a Stall Alarm
Failing to identify an aerodynamic stall can lead to the inability of an aircraft to sustain flight. To warn pilots of an impending or fully-developed stall, many aircraft have safety devices installe…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗