ERA14LA382
2014-08-10 · West Palm Beach, Florida, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport LNA
N214MJ has since been reassigned. It is now registered to a different aircraft (RANS S-21 OUTBOUND, built 2022), which was not involved in this event.
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot’s excessive landing speed, which resulted in a runway excursion and noseover. Contributing to the accident was a partial loss of engine power during an attempted go-around for reasons that could not be determined because no anomalies were identified during postaccident examination.
Factual narrative
On August 10, 2014, about 1123 eastern daylight time, a Jackson Van's RV6A, N214MJ, was substantially damaged following a partial loss of engine power and precautionary landing at Palm Beach County Park Airport (LNA), West Palm Beach, Florida. The private pilot received minor injuries. The airplane was operated by the pilot under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 91 and no flight plan was filed. Day, visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the personal flight that originated at Kissimmee Airport (ISM), Kissimmee, Florida and was destined for North Perry Airport (HWO), Pembroke Pines, Florida. According to the pilot, the ground operations, takeoff, and departure were normal. About 20 minutes into the flight, at 5,500 feet above mean sea level, the engine began "missing," but continued to run. This occurred about every minute, and lasted about one second each time. He reported the engine issue to air traffic control, and alternate airport information was provided along with flight following. He climbed to 10,000 feet and assessed the situation. He switched fuel tanks, checked the magnetos, adjusted the mixture, and cycled the propeller. After scanning his engine instruments, he noted that engine rpm was 1,300 with 22" manifold pressure. After discussing his situation with ATC, he elected to divert into LNA, about 13 miles to the south-southeast. He set up for an approach to runway 27. He crossed the runway threshold about 25 feet above the ground and at 110 knots. Unable to slow the airplane to a safe landing speed, he attempted a go-around. The engine "appeared to rev up" but there was little power observed. He discontinued the go-around and landed straight ahead. The airplane departed the runway at the departure end and the pilot applied rudder and aileron controls to avoid striking the perimeter fence. The airplane flipped over and came to rest, inverted. An inspector with the Federal Aviation Administration responded to the accident site and examined the wreckage. He confirmed substantial damage to both wings and extensive damage to the fuselage. The airplane was equipped with a Dynon EFIS-D6 (D6) uncertified electronic flight information system (EFIS). The D6 was removed by aircraft recovery personal and sent to the NTSB Vehicle Recorders Laboratory, Washington, DC for possible flight and engine data retrieval. The D6 incorporated a 3.8" display for mounting in the cockpit of non-type certificated aircraft. The instrument integrated multiple flight instruments including attitude, airspeed, altitude, magnetic compass, turn rate, slip/skid ball, bank angle, pitch angle, and vertical speed. The unit contained an Air Data, Attitude and Heading Reference System (ADAHRS) to provide air data, attitude, and heading to the display. There was no log file capability on the D6 which meant that no parameters are recorded or stored. Based upon discussions with Dynon technical support representatives, there was no logging capability planned for future firmware releases. The only information available from the device is the last input altimeter setting (30.08"). The wreckage was examined by a NTSB Senior Air Safety Investigator at the wreckage storage facility. A review of the cockpit revealed that the fuel selector was positioned to the right main fuel tank. The mixture and propeller levers were full forward and the throttle lever was retarded. The mixture and throttle linkages remained attached to the fuel metering unit. No obstructions were observed in the air intake. The top spark plugs were removed; their electrodes were intact and exhibited color consistent with a rich mixture. The valve covers were removed and oil was noted throughout the engine. When the propeller was rotated by hand, camshaft, crankshaft, and valve train continuity were confirmed and thumb compression was attained on all cylinders. Several drops of fuel were recovered from the fuel line to the fuel metering unit. The fuel was clear and consistent with 100 low lead aviation gasoline. Additionally, the fuel screen in the fuel metering unit was absent of contamination. Approximately 10 gallons of fuel had been drained from the wreckage and retained at the recovery facility; the fuel was clear, blue, and absent of moisture when tested with water finding paste. The pilot reported that, about 20 minutes into the flight and at 5,500 feet above mean sea level, the engine began "missing" but continued to run. This occurred about every minute and lasted about 1 second each time. He reported the engine issue to air traffic control, climbed the airplane to 10,000 feet, and eventually elected to divert to an airport about 13 miles away. He set up for an approach to land to the west; however, he crossed the runway threshold about 25 feet above the ground and at 110 knots. Unable to slow the airplane to a safe landing speed, he attempted a go-around. The engine "appeared to rev up" but he observed little power being produced. He discontinued the go-around and landed straight ahead. The airplane overran the runway at the departure end, and the pilot applied rudder and aileron controls to avoid striking a perimeter fence. The airplane flipped over and came to rest inverted, with substantial damage to both wings and extensive damage to the fuselage. The airplane was equipped with an electronic flight information system; however, it did not record any useful data. The airplane's fuel tanks appeared to contain an adequate amount of fuel for the flight. The engine was examined and no anomalies or failures were observed. The reason for the partial loss of engine power could not be determined after a full examination of the wreckage. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- F Not determined-Not determined-(general)-(general)-Unknown/Not determined - F
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Airspeed-Not attained/maintained - C
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Use of equip/system-Pilot - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2014_ERA14LA382.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (runway excursion, go-around). All research papers
- SKYbrary (Eurocontrol) 2024 · SKYbrary article Runway Excursion — SKYbrary Knowledge Base
SKYbrary runway excursion review — RE-OE (overruns) + RE-LO (lateral). Risk drivers: long landing, high approach speed, contaminated surface, tailwind, mis-set autobrakes.
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research) Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace) Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes) Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.