ERA15IA009
2014-10-01 · Atlanta, Georgia, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport RYY
Current FAA registration · N301EF
- Make / Model
- VELOCITY 173/RG-XL ELITE
- Year of manufacture
- 2002 · 12 years old at event
- Engine
- CONT MOTOR IO-550 SERIES (300 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 2 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 20260304
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A32373
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot’s failure to maintain directional control during a hard landing, which resulted in the fracture of the nose landing gear.
Factual narrative
On October 1, 2014, about 2105 eastern daylight time, a Funk Velocity XLRG experimental amateur-built airplane, N301EF, sustained minor damage during a hard landing to Cobb County – McCollum Field (RYY), Atlanta, Georgia. The private pilot was not injured. Night visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed for the local flight which departed RYY about 2105. The personal flight was conducted under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91.In a written statement, the pilot stated that he intended to perform 3 takeoffs and landings for the purpose of maintaining night currency. He said the first takeoff and landing were uneventful, and that at touchdown he used "aerodynamic braking to slow down by keeping the nose off the runway as long as possible." The pilot explained that the second landing was the same as the first, only the approach was faster and more runway was used. He said, "I started braking as I dropped the nose and it came down harder than the first landing." The pilot stated that after the nose gear touched down, the airplane was "pulling" to the right, and developed a shimmy. He said he attempted to maintain directional control with braking as the shimmy in the front end intensified, and then the nose gear subsequently collapsed, which resulted in minor damage to the nose landing gear doors and the nose enclosure. The pilot added that he has had the nose "drop harder onto the runway in the past with no ill consequences." The pilot held a private pilot certificate with ratings for airplane single-engine land and instrument airplane. His most recent FAA second-class medical certificate was issued December 12, 2012. He reported 926 total hours of flight experience, of which 774 hours were in the incident airplane make and model. According to FAA records, the airplane was manufactured in 2002. Its most recent conditional inspection was completed June 26, 2014 at 321 total aircraft hours. According to maintenance records, a refurbished nose landing gear was installed September 26, 2014. At 2120, the weather observation at RYY included clear skies and calm winds. Examination of the airplane by an FAA aviation safety inspector revealed minor damage to the nose landing gear doors and the nose enclosure. On October 27, 2014, the fractured segments of the nose landing gear leg were examined in the NTSB Materials Laboratory in Washington, DC. Examination of the fracture surfaces revealed features consistent with ductile overstress fracture. The overall fracture pattern was consistent with fracture under a lateral bending load. The purpose of the flight was to perform three takeoffs and landings at night. The pilot stated that the first takeoff and landing was uneventful and that, at touchdown, he used aerodynamic braking to slow the airplane by keeping its nose off the runway as long as possible. He added that the second landing was faster, that more runway was used, and that the nose landing gear (NLG) touched down "harder" than during the first landing. After the NLG touched down, the airplane pulled right and developed a shimmy. The pilot subsequently lost directional control of the airplane, and the NLG collapsed. Examination of the fracture surfaces on the NLG revealed features consistent with ductile overstress fracture. The overall fracture pattern was consistent with fracture under a lateral bending load. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Directional control-Not attained/maintained - C
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Aircraft control-Pilot - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2014_ERA15IA009.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.