Skip to content

Atlas / NTSB / ERA15LA077

NTSB CAROL · Event

Event ERA15LA077

2014-12-13 Ellisville, Mississippi, United States Airport · LUL None 1 aircraft Status: Completed

Aircraft involved

Probable cause & findings

The failure of the uncertified engine's front connecting rod needle bearing, which resulted in damage to the front piston and a subsequent loss of engine power. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s decision to operate the airplane with the uncertified engine over a town that had no suitable area to land.

Factual narrative

On December 13, 2014, about 1440 central standard time, an experimental, amateur-built Wade Revelation, N783QJ, was substantially damaged during a forced landed following a total loss of engine power near Ellisville, Mississippi. The commercial pilot was not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed for the local flight that departed from Hesler-Nobel Field (LUL), Laurel, Mississippi about 1425. The airplane was registered to and operated by a private individual under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as a personal flight.The pilot reported that he was in cruise flight, over a town, with the engine set at 75 percent power, the engine made a "little skip." He immediately turned the airplane in the direction of the airport; however, the engine subsequently lost all power. The only clear area to land was a road running through a cemetery. While on approach to the road, the left wing struck a tree, the airplane veered to the left, and subsequently impacted a tombstone and nosed over. He further reported that the airplane's fuel tank was approximately three-fourths full when the engine ceased operation. Initial examination of the engine by a Federal Aviation Administration inspector revealed that a longeron was substantially damaged and the engine would partially rotate through one revolution and then seize. During manual operation of the engine, a "metallic scraping" was audibly observed. The spark plugs were removed and one spark plug was "really dry." The fuel/oil mixture was examined and appeared normal in color. During a follow-on engine examination by the FAA inspector, the front cylinder exhibited scoring on the cylinder wall. The gaps on both spark plugs were closed and "several small" metal pieces were located inside the cylinder. Further examination revealed the front connecting rod needle bearing failed and no overheating of the bearing or cylinder was noted. The two-seat, high-wing, pusher propeller, tube and fabric airplane was powered by a two-stroke Zanzottera MS202 engine. According to the pilot, the engine had accumulated 81 hours total time in service, and 78 hours since its most recent inspection. Examination of the engine's "Instruction and Maintenance Manual" revealed a warning which stated in part, "WARNING, this is not an aeronautic approved engine. This engine has not been subjected to durability and safety tests in compliance with aeronautical standards and is not a certified engine….The user must assume responsibility for all risks deriving from the use of this engine and must understand that this engine is subject to sudden failure…Never use an aircraft fitted with this engine in areas, conditions and altitudes that may cause problems if forced to land as a result of sudden engine failure." According to the pilot, while in cruise flight over a town, the engine lost total power. During the forced landing to a cemetery, the airplane's left wing struck a tree, and the airplane then veered left and impacted a tombstone and nosed over. The pilot further reported that the fuel tank was about 3/4 full when the engine lost power. Examination of the engine revealed that the front connecting rod needle bearing had failed, which resulted in damage to the front piston and led to the loss of engine power. The engine manufacturer's instruction and maintenance manual warned that the engine was uncertified and that it was "subject to sudden failure." The manual further warned to "never use an aircraft fitted with this engine in areas, conditions and altitudes that may cause problems if forced to land as a result of sudden engine failure." The pilot should not have operated the airplane with the uncertified engine over a town that had no suitable place to land in the event of an engine failure. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12

NTSB Findings

Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).

  • C Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Engine (reciprocating)-Recip eng cyl section-Failure - C
  • Environmental issues-Physical environment-Object/animal/substance-Tree(s)-Contributed to outcome
  • Environmental issues-Physical environment-Terrain-(general)-Contributed to outcome
  • F Personnel issues-Action/decision-Info processing/decision-Decision making/judgment-Pilot - F

Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file NTSB_2014_ERA15LA077.txt. Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb. Full investigation docket on data.ntsb.gov ↗.

Related research

What the literature says.

Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (engine failure, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.

Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗