ERA15LA177
2015-04-06 · Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport XLL
Current FAA registration · N4826H
- Make / Model
- MOONEY M20J
- Year of manufacture
- 1979 · 36 years old at event
- Engine
- LYCOMING I0360 SER A&C (200 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 4 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19790926
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A5F339
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A total loss of engine power during takeoff due to an interruption of fuel flow to the engine. The reason for the interruption of the fuel flow could not be determined during postaccident examination and testing.
Factual narrative
On April 6, 2015, at 1256 eastern daylight time, N4826H, a Mooney M20J airplane, was substantially damaged during a forced landing after a total loss of engine power shortly after takeoff from the Allentown Queen City Municipal Airport (XLL), Allentown, Pennsylvania. The commercial pilot and the passenger were not injured. The airplane was registered to and operated by a private individual. No flight plan was filed for the flight that originated at the Lehigh Valley International Airport (ABE), Allentown, Pennsylvania, about 1230. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the personal flight conducted under 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. According to the pilot, he conducted a preflight inspection of the airplane, which included visually checking the total amount of fuel in each fuel tank. He stated there was about 25 gallons of fuel in the left-wing fuel tank and about 7 or 8 gallons in the right-wing fuel tank. The pilot said the engine started normally and he taxied to the runway where he performed an engine run-up. The engine run up was normal and he confirmed the fuel selector was on the left-wing fuel tank. The pilot said he then departed and flew to XLL for the purpose of practicing takeoffs and landings. On the fourth takeoff, about 30 minutes into the flight, when the airplane reached an altitude about 400 to 500-feet-above the runway, the "engine quit." The pilot described the loss of power as an "instantaneous stop with no warning or sputtering." He then made a forced landing straight ahead and the airplane struck a wire-mesh fence that was supported with steel poles. An initial postaccident examination of the airplane was conducted by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) about 30 minutes after the accident. According to an inspector, the left and right wings sustained substantial damage and the nose gear had collapsed. The inspector did not see any fuel leaking from the airplane and the fuel selector was in the "off" position. The throttle/propeller/fuel-mixture controls were all in the full forward position. Further examination of the airplane conducted the day after the accident by an FAA maintenance inspector revealed there was about 4-5 gallons of fuel in the right tank and about 8-12 gallons of fuel in the left tank. The inspector disconnected the fuel line from the engine driven fuel pump to the fuel servo and there was no fuel in the line. He then disconnected the fuel line that runs from the boost pump to the engine driven fuel pump and when the boost pump was turned on, fuel came out in a pulsating spray indicative of air in the line. The airplane was equipped with two fuel tanks in each wing for a total capacity of 64 gallons, of which 61 gallons were usable. No mechanical anomalies were noted that would have precluded normal operation of the engine. The pilot held a commercial pilot certificate for airplane single-engine and multi-engine land, and instrument airplane. He reported a total of 3,029 flight hours, of which, 60 hours were in the accident airplane. The pilot stated that he departed with about 25 gallons of fuel in the left wing fuel tank and about 7 or 8 gallons in the right wing fuel tank and with the fuel selector positioned to the left wing fuel tank. After departure, he flew the airplane to a local airport to practice takeoffs and landings. During the fourth takeoff, about 30 minutes into the flight, and when the airplane was about 400 to 500 ft above the runway, the engine suddenly stopped producing power. The pilot made a forced landing straight ahead, and the airplane struck a fence. Postaccident examination revealed no mechanical anomalies that would have precluded normal engine operation. Examination of the airplane revealed that the left and right wings were damaged, but no fuel was observed leaking from the airplane. About 4 to 5 gallons of fuel was found in the right tank, and about 8 to 12 gallons of fuel was found in the left tank; the fuel found in the tanks was higher than the unusable fuel limit for each tank. The fuel line from the engine-driven fuel pump to the fuel servo was disassembled, and there was no fuel in the line. The fuel line from the boost pump to the engine-driven fuel pump was disconnected, and, when the boost pump was turned, fuel came out in a pulsating spray, which indicates that air was in the line. Based on the evidence, it is likely that there was an interruption of fuel flow to the engine, which resulted in the loss of power; however, the reason for the interruption of the fuel flow could not be determined. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Not determined-Not determined-(general)-(general)-Unknown/Not determined - C
- C Aircraft-Fluids/misc hardware-Fluids-Fuel-Not specified - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2015_ERA15LA177.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Faculty research project Reconfigurable Guidance and Control Systems for Emerging On-Orbit Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing (OSAM) Space Vehicles
Dynamic response to emergent situations is a necessity in the on-orbit servicing, assembly, and manufacturing (OSAM) field, because traditional on-orbit guidance and control (G&C) cannot respond effic…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2019 · Journal article (IJAAA) Satellite Maintenance: An Opportunity to Minimize the Kessler Effect
Recently, there has been an emphasis on the growing problem of orbital debris. While the advantages of placing satellites into space are numerous, advances in satellite technology combined with the gr…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2015 · Conference paper The Implementation of Safety Management Systems in Maintenance Operations
Literature for Safety Management Systems (SMS) that apply to flight operations is abundant, but there is a limited supply of SMS-related literature for maintenance operations.
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Enabling Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight Drones Operation over Open RAN 5G Networks with Slicing
Among the foretold claims of the transition from 5G to 6G, Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight (BVLoS) drone operation has emerged as a prominent Internet-of-Robots enabler.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR) Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…