ERA16LA051
2015-11-24 · Lawrenceville, Georgia, United States · Serious · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport LZU
Current FAA registration · N3971R
- Make / Model
- PIPER PA-32-260
- Year of manufacture
- 1966 · 49 years old at event
- Engine
- LYCOMING 0-540 SERIES (250 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 6 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19660617
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A49F55
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The flight instructor's inadequate fuel management, which resulted in a total loss of engine power during initial climb due to fuel starvation and a subsequent forced landing.
Factual narrative
On November 24, 2015, about 1600 eastern standard time, a Piper PA-28-180, N3971R, operated by a private individual, was substantially damaged during a forced landing into trees, following a total loss of engine power during initial climb from Gwinnett County Airport (LZU), Lawrenceville, Georgia. The flight instructor was seriously injured and the student pilot incurred minor injuries. The instructional flight was conducted under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed for the planned local flight. According to the flight instructor's written statement, shortly after turning onto the crosswind leg in the airport traffic pattern for runway 7, the engine lost all power. The flight instructor then took control of the airplane and elected not to attempt to glide back to the airport as the airplane was about 500 feet above ground level. He subsequently performed a forced landing straight ahead into trees. According to the student pilot's written statement, earlier during the day of the accident, they departed LZU with approximately 34 gallons of fuel on a round-trip cross-country flight. After landing at the destination airport, which was about 60 miles from LZU, they completed two more full-stop landings before returning to LZU. After landing uneventfully at LZU, the flight instructor wanted the student pilot to perform one more good landing before concluding the lesson. Everything seemed normal until the student pilot turned the airplane onto the crosswind leg of the airport traffic pattern, at which time the engine lost all power without any sputtering or roughness. He further stated, "It sounded like we had turned off the engine after a lesson: just a smooth shutdown as if the mixture was dropped to full lean after parking…" The student pilot added that the flight instructor tried to restart the engine and it "nearly caught, but then shut off again." Examination of the wreckage by a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector revealed damage to both wings and the fuselage. Both fuel tanks were compromised during the impact and the inspector was unable to determine fuel quantity. The inspector subsequently performed a successful test-run of the engine at a recovery facility. The four-seat, low-wing, fixed tricycle-gear airplane, serial number 28-7105076, was manufactured in 1971 and was powered by a Lycoming O-360, 180-horsepower engine, equipped with a two-blade Sensenich propeller. It had a total fuel capacity of 50 gallons, which was stored in the main fuel tanks located in each respective wing and were individually selectable through a cockpit fuel selector. Review of the airplane's logbooks revealed that its most recent annual inspection was completed on November 13, 2015. At that time, the airplane had accumulated 6,783 total hours of operation. The engine had accumulated 579 hours since major overhaul. During interviews with the inspector, both pilots stated that they did not switch fuel tanks following the total loss of engine power. The student pilot further stated that they "ran out of gas." Review of performance information for the make and model airplane revealed that the engine consumed about 10 gallons of fuel per hour at 75 percent power. Based on the student pilot's estimation of 34 gallons onboard at the beginning of the day, the airplane should have had 5 to 10 gallons of fuel remaining at the accident site; however, all of the remaining fuel may have been in one fuel tank. Although the flight instructor provided a written statement to the FAA, he failed to submit a completed NTSB Pilot/Operator Accident Report form after several verbal and written requests. The flight instructor and student pilot departed their home airport with about 34 gallons of fuel on board the airplane for the planned approximate 60-mile, round-trip, cross-country instructional flight. The student pilot reported that, after landing at the destination airport, they completed two more full-stop landings before returning to, and then landing uneventfully at, the departure airport. The flight instructor wanted the student pilot to complete one more landing before concluding the lesson. The student stated that, during the subsequent takeoff, everything seemed normal until he turned the airplane onto the crosswind leg of the airport traffic pattern, at which time the engine lost all power. The flight instructor then took control of the airplane. The flight instructor reported that he chose not to attempt to turn back and glide to the airport because the airplane was about 500 ft above ground level. He subsequently performed a forced landing straight ahead into trees. Both fuel tanks were compromised during the impact, and the fuel quantity at impact could not be determined. Subsequently, an engine test run was performed with no anomalies noted. Both pilots reported that they did not switch the fuel tanks following the total loss of engine power. The student pilot further stated that the airplane "ran out of gas." Review of performance information for the make and model airplane revealed that, based on the reported fuel onboard the airplane at the beginning of the day, it should have had between 5 and 10 gallons of fuel remaining at the time of the accident. Although the amount of fuel in each fuel tank could not be determined, the loss of engine power likely resulted from a lack of available fuel in the selected tank. Because the flight instructor was the pilot-in-command and told the student to conduct another landing, he should have been more cognizant of the fuel level in the tanks. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Aircraft-Fluids/misc hardware-Fluids-Fuel-Fluid management - C
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Use of equip/system-Instructor/check pilot - C
- — Environmental issues-Physical environment-Object/animal/substance-Tree(s)-Contributed to outcome
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2015_ERA16LA051.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (fuel starvation). All research papers