ERA16LA318
2016-09-16 · Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport LNS
Current FAA registration · N224MH
- Make / Model
- CESSNA P210N
- Year of manufacture
- 1978 · 38 years old at event
- Engine
- TCM CONT TSIO 520 SER (350 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 6 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 20031022
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A1F0F8
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A landing gear collapse during landing for reasons that could not be determined because postaccident examination and testing of the landing gear did not reveal any evidence of preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation.
Factual narrative
On September 16, 2016, at 1105 eastern daylight time, a Cessna P210, N224MH, operated by Ridge View Air, was substantially damaged following collapse of the main landing gear during landing at Lancaster Airport (LNS), Lancaster, Pennsylvania. The flight instructor and pilot receiving instruction were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed for the instructional flight, which was conducted under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. The flight departed Chester County G O Carlson Airport (MQS), Coatesville, Pennsylvania, about 1045. According to the flight instructor, the purpose of the flight was to conduct a training session for the pilot under instruction, who was pursuing high-performance and complex airplane endorsements. The first flight leg originated from LNS, and flew to MQS, where six uneventful full-stop landings were performed which included exercising the landing gear. The second and final leg of the flight was the return to LNS. Upon arrival, the pilot receiving instruction lowered the landing gear as the airplane entered a downwind traffic pattern leg for runway 08. Subsequently, both pilots twice confirmed the landing gear was in the down and locked position. During landing, the airplane initially touched down and then momentarily lifted off, and as it did so, the landing gear warning horn sounded. The flight instructor then took the controls and set the airplane down on the right main landing gear. As the airplane decelerated, the nose wheel touched down and a right yaw developed, the left wing settled onto the runway, and the airplane slid to a stop. Examination of the accident scene by a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector revealed that the airplane came to rest upright on the right side of the runway oriented on heading of about 230 degrees magnetic. The airplane was resting on the left wingtip, fuselage, and nose wheel. Both main landing gear were collapsed and near their respective "up" positions, while the nose gear was in the down position and canted toward the right. A set of two tire marks about 350 feet long was found on the runway extending west from the airplane toward the approach end of the runway. A third tire mark extended about 150 feet west from the location of the nose wheel. The left horizontal stabilizer, left elevator, and left aileron were substantially damaged. The airplane was examined again by FAA inspectors following its recovery to a hangar. The examination revealed that the right main landing gear lock mechanism was engaged, while the left main landing gear lock mechanism was disengaged. The airplane was then jacked and balanced such that all three landing gear were off the ground. The right main landing gear was manually unlocked, and hydraulic and electrical power applied to the airplane. As power was applied the gear unsafe horn sounded. The landing gear lever was moved to the extend position, and both main landing gear moved to the down and locked position. The main landing rear locks were manually released, and the procedure repeated two additional times, with the same results. The landing gear was not retracted during the test, due to the damage to the nose wheel assembly. The landing gear indicating system, unsafe warning horn, operating lever and main landing gear lock system all functioned properly. The hydraulic reservoir level was about 1/16 inch above the "add" line. The examination and tests did not reveal any preimpact mechanical malfunctions. Review of maintenance records revealed that the airplane's most recent annual inspection occurred on December 4, 2015, at which time the airplane had accrued a total of 3,772 hours. The recorded wind at LNS, at 1109, was from 160° at 5 knots. During an instructional flight in a retractable landing gear airplane, the flight instructor and pilot under instruction performed multiple landings uneventfully. As the airplane entered the downwind traffic pattern, the pilot under instruction lowered the landing gear; both pilots confirmed that the landing gear was in the down and locked position. During landing, the airplane initially touched down in a 5-knot right crosswind and then momentarily lifted off; as it did so, the landing gear warning horn sounded. The flight instructor then took the controls and set the airplane down on the right main landing gear. As the airplane decelerated, the nosewheel touched down and a right yaw developed, the left wing settled onto the runway, and the airplane slid to a stop. The airframe incurred substantial damage during the landing. Postaccident examination and functional testing of the landing gear did not reveal any evidence of preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation, although the testing was limited in scope due to damage incurred to the nose landing gear during the accident. Thus, the reason for the landing gear collapse could not be determined. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Not determined-Not determined-(general)-(general)-Unknown/Not determined - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2016_ERA16LA318.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…