NTSB CAROL · Event
Event ERA17LA026
Registry · N497SJ
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
CESSNA 172S
Year of manufacture
2000 · 16 years old at event
Engine
LYCOMING I0-360-B1E (180 hp)
Seats / Engines
4 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
20000619
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A62BB2
Registrant of record
FXE FLIGHTCENTER CORP
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot’s improper landing flare in gusting crosswind conditions, which resulted in a nose landing gear collapse.
Factual narrative
On October 1, 2016, about 1808 eastern daylight time, a Cessna 172S airplane, N497SJ, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Fort Lauderdale, Florida. The pilot and passenger were not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot's preflight inspection revealed no anomalies, and he determined that the engine contained 7 quarts of oil. He taxied to the runway, completed an engine run-up, and was cleared for takeoff. The pilot applied full throttle and checked that all engine instruments were in the "green arc," including oil temperature and oil pressure. At 2,500 feet mean sea level (msl) and 5 nautical miles northwest of the departure airport, the pilot noticed the oil temperature indicated 245°, or redline. The pilot contacted air traffic control and requested to return to the airport; shortly thereafter, the engine began running roughly. The tower controller cleared the pilot for landing, and upon touchdown, the airplane bounced and came to rest on the runway. The pilot stated that he did not go around or abort the landing because of the potential engine issue. On-scene examination of the airplane by a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector revealed that the airplane contacted the runway on the nose landing gear, which was bent forward and had collapsed into the firewall. The propeller struck the runway, damaging both propeller tips. Oil was seeping from both sides of the engine cowling, both of the access doors on the cowling, and from underneath the cowling. The engine oil quantity dipstick indicated that about 3 quarts of oil remained in the engine. The oil appeared clear and free of contamination. Examination of the engine under supervision from an FAA inspector revealed no hidden damage; however, the vernatherm, would not close. The vernatherm is a thermostatic oil cooler bypass valve which allows cold engine oil to bypass the oil cooler, then closes when the oil temperature reaches about 180°F, forcing the engine oil to pass through the oil cooler. Review of air traffic control audio recordings revealed that, when providing the landing clearance, the tower controller advised the pilot that the wind was from 080° at 9 knots gusting to 18 knots, which would have resulted in a 50° left crosswind component of between 7 and 14 knots for the landing runway. According to the Cessna 172S Pilot’s Operating Handbook, the maximum demonstrated crosswind velocity was 15 knots. Shortly after departing on the local flight, the pilot noticed that the engine oil temperature indicated 245°, or redline, and the engine began to run roughly. The pilot contacted air traffic control and requested to return to the airport. The controller cleared the pilot to land and advised of the wind conditions. Upon touchdown, the airplane bounced and came to rest on the runway, resulting in substantial damage. On-scene examination revealed damage consistent with the airplane impacting the runway on the nose landing gear. Examination of the engine revealed that the vernatherm had failed, which would have resulted in elevated engine oil temperature; however, there were no other engine anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. The conditions at the time of the accident included a 50° crosswind between 7 and 14 knots. The airplane's published maximum crosswind component was 15 knots. The circumstances of the accident are consistent with the pilot's improper landing flare while landing in gusting, crosswind conditions, which resulted in the nose landing gear contacting the runway and its subsequent collapse. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- — Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Aircraft control-Pilot
- — Environmental issues-Conditions/weather/phenomena-Wind-Crosswind-Response/compensation
- — Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Engine (reciprocating)-Recip eng oil sys-Failure
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2016_ERA17LA026.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type. Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper
Crash Testing and Simulation of a Cessna 172 Aircraft: Pitch Down Impact Onto Soft Soil
During the summer of 2015, NASA Langley Research Center conducted three full-scale crash tests of Cessna 172 (C-172) aircraft at the NASA Langley Landing and Impact Research (LandIR) Facility.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Technical Memorandum (TM)
Simulating the Impact Response of Three Full-Scale Crash Tests of Cessna 172 Aircraft
During the summer of 2015, a series of three full-scale crash tests were performed at the Landing and Impact Research Facility located at NASA Langley Research Center of Cessna 172 aircraft.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper
Validation of Training Satisfaction Survey
The Training Satisfaction Survey (TSS) was developed as part of a larger project to examine the features of Virtual Reality software and supporting devices as a training program on visual illusions an…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Data in Brief)
Cockpit voice recorder transcript data: Capturing safety voice and safety listening during historic aviation accidents
Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) transcripts capture audio data within cockpit environments. This aids the investigation of causal factors contributing to aviation accidents by revealing communication and…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Safety Science)
Safety voice and safety listening during aviation accidents: Cockpit voice recordings reveal that speaking-up to power is not enough
Abstract Safety voice is theorised as an important factor for mitigating accidents, but behavioural research during actual hazards has been scant.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (JAAER)
Can Backward-Chained, Ab-Initio Pilot Training Decrease Time to First Solo?
Flight simulation has made progressively significant inroads into pilot training at all levels of a pilot’s career – typically starting with training for the Instrument rating in light aircraft and co…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗