NTSB CAROL · Event
Event ERA17LA227
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A partial loss of engine power during initial climb for reasons that could not be determined and the pilot's subsequent exceedance of the airplane's critical angle of attack, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall.
Factual narrative
On July 4, 2017, at 1721 Atlantic daylight time, a Piper PA28-180, N9427J, operated by Horizon Aviation, was substantially damaged when it impacted the San Antonio Canal shortly after takeoff from Fernando Luis Ribas Dominicci Airport (SIG), San Juan, Puerto Rico. The private pilot and three passengers were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed for the local personal flight, which was conducted under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91.According to the pilot, the purpose of the flight was to fly to a designated practice area, and return. Prior to the flight, the airplane was fueled. The pilot also calculated the weight and balance, performed a preflight inspection of the airplane and an engine run-up, with no issues noted. During the takeoff roll on runway 9, the engine instruments were "in the green" and the engine developed full power. During the initial climb at an altitude of about 250 ft above ground level, the engine started to run rough and lose power. The engine did not respond to throttle inputs. The pilot informed the air traffic control tower that he intended to return and land on runway 27. As the airplane flew toward a marina, the pilot recalled seeing people on the ground and wanted to avoid them. He did not recall the remainder of the accident sequence. One of the passengers was also a certificated pilot. He stated that the takeoff roll was normal, he observed the airspeed indicator at 60 knots, and liftoff was normal. The pilot flying then reported the engine was rough and radioed the control tower to request to return to runway 27. The passenger estimated the altitude to be around 200 to 300 ft at that time and he also noticed the engine roughness and loss of power, accompanied by vibrations. He stated that the pilot tried hard to avoid people on the ground. As the pilot was turning left, the passenger observed that the airplane was losing airspeed, and he saw the stall warning light flashing and he called out to the pilot "airspeed" a few times. He then recalled the airplane in a stall/spin attitude. A witness located at the marina recorded a portion of the flight on a video camera. A review of the recording revealed that about 20 seconds before impact, the airplane was flying relatively level in an easterly direction, for about 5 seconds, before being obscured by a water drop on the camera lens. About 7 seconds later, the airplane was visible again and on a southerly heading, toward the camera, in a left descending turn. The airplane's bank angle increased to about 90° left wing down, before it impacted the canal. The pilot held a private pilot certificate with ratings for airplane single-engine land and instrument airplane. His most recent first-class medical certificate was issued on October 9, 2012. Review of the pilot's logbook revealed that he had accrued a total flight experience of about 142 hours. His previous flight was on April 10, 2017, which was a "rental check" in the accident airplane. Review of the airplane's maintenance records revealed that the most recent 100-hour inspection was performed on March 25, 2017, about 90 hours prior to the accident. Additionally, the most recent annual inspection was completed on July 19, 2016, about 193 hours prior to the accident. The engine had accrued a total of 4,233 hours since new, and 937 hours since overhaul. Initial examination of the airplane by a Federal Aviation Administrator (FAA) inspector revealed that left wing was separated from the fuselage at the root, the right wing was partially separated at the root. The empennage was crushed in several locations, the left stabilator was partially separated and bent upward about 90° at its root. The throttle and mixture controls were found in the full-forward position, the carburetor heat control was in the off position. The fuel selector handle was in the right tank position, the electric fuel pump switch was in the "on" position. Both fuel caps were secure with their seals intact. The engine was drained of sea water, oil, and sediment for examination by an FAA inspector. The inspector removed the spark plugs and did not observe any wear or damage. The carburetor was removed from engine and no damage was noted. The inspector was able to rotate the propeller and obtain compression on all cylinders. The examination did not reveal any preimpact anomalies. An on-board video recording and the witness video recording were forwarded to the National Transportation Safety Board Vehicle Recorder Laboratory, Washington, DC. Review of the onboard video revealed that the airplane lifted off about 35.2 seconds elapsed time (all times are elapsed times). At 1:16.3, the airplane rolled slightly right. Between 1:18.7 and 1:19.7, the engine noise decreased. At 1:20.0, the airplane rolled level and the engine noise further decreased between 1:27.2 and 1:30.1. At 1:30.8, the airplane began to bank left. At 1:34.9, the airplane was in a descending left bank turn. Between 1:34.0 and 1:36.6, there was a momentary increase in background noise, consistent with an increase in engine noise. Between 1:36.8 and 1:37.7, the background noise decreased slightly, and remained at the same levels between 1:36.6 and 1:44.3. The sound of impact was recorded at 1:44.6. A sound spectrum study of the onboard video revealed that engine rpm was at 2,265 for about 7 seconds as the airplane was in the right bank. It then decreased to 1,980 rpm and the airplane began to bank left. The rpm momentarily increased to 2,292 about 5 seconds later, followed by a momentary decrease to 1,950, but remained stable between 2,373 to 2,451 rpm for about 6 seconds leading up to impact. The recorded weather at SIG, at 1729, was: wind from 070° at 14 knots; visibility 8 miles; thin scattered clouds at 3,500 ft; scattered clouds at 8,000 ft; temperature 29° C; dew point 25° C; altimeter 30.01 inches of mercury. Review of an FAA Carburetor Icing Chart for the given temperature and dew point revealed "Icing (glide and cruise power)." The private pilot reported that, before the local, personal flight, the airplane was fueled and that he performed a preflight inspection and an engine run-up with no issues noted. The takeoff was normal; however, during the initial climb, about 250 ft above ground level, the engine started to run roughly and lose power. The engine did not respond to throttle inputs. The pilot contacted the air traffic control tower and stated that he intended to return to the departure airport to land. He did not recall the remainder of the accident sequence. A passenger, who was also a certificated pilot, stated that, as the pilot was turning the airplane left back to the airport, he saw that the airspeed was decreasing and that the stall warning light was flashing. Subsequently, the airplane entered an aerodynamic stall and spun into a canal. A review of a video taken by a witness corroborated the passenger's account. Examination of the airframe and engine did not reveal any preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. Sound spectrum analysis of onboard video revealed that the engine rpm decreased by about 300 and then increased by about 300 twice but then remained steady near full power for about 6 seconds before impact. The reason for the rpm changes could not be determined. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
Hierarchical cause / factor breakdown from the FAA bulk avdata database. Each finding tagged C (Cause) or F (Factor).
- C Not determined-Not determined-(general)-(general)-Unknown/Not determined - C
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Aircraft control-Pilot - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Angle of attack-Not attained/maintained - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2017_ERA17LA227.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing, stall, maintenance). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Faculty research project
Reconfigurable Guidance and Control Systems for Emerging On-Orbit Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing (OSAM) Space Vehicles
Dynamic response to emergent situations is a necessity in the on-orbit servicing, assembly, and manufacturing (OSAM) field, because traditional on-orbit guidance and control (G&C) cannot respond effic…
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper
The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint
Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Contractor Report (CR)
An Evaluation of an Analytical Simulation of an Airplane with Tailplane Icing by Comparison to Flight Data
This report presents the assessment of an analytical tool developed as part of the NASA/FAA Tailplane Icing Program. The analytical tool is a specialized simulation program called TAILSM4 which was de…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Technical Publication (TP)
NASA/FAA Tailplane Icing Program: Flight Test Report
This report presents results from research flights that explored the characteristics of an ice-contaminated tailplane using various simulated ice shapes attached to the leading edge of the horizontal …
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗