ERA18LA154
2018-05-21 · Sandersville, Georgia, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport OKZ
Current FAA registration · N427JM
- Make / Model
- CESSNA 421C
- Seats / Engines
- 8 seats · 2 engines
- Last airworthiness date
- 19821122
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A51674
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A nose landing gear collapse for reasons that could not be determined based on the available information.
Factual narrative
On May 21, 2018, about 1310 eastern daylight time, a Cessna 421-C, N427JM, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Sandersville, Georgia. The commercial pilot was not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot reported that the flight was uneventful; during the landing approach, he placed the landing gear handle in the down position and received three green landing gear lights, indicating that the gear was down and locked. He stated that, after the main landing gear touched down, “he didn’t feel any resistance from the nose nosewheel” when it settled onto the runway. The airplane continued to settle, and the nose impacted the runway. The pilot maintained directional control and attempted to maneuver the airplane off the runway onto a taxiway with differential braking as it skidded to a stop. After the airplane stopped, the landing gear position lights indicated that all gear were down and locked. A mechanic saw the landing and reported that the airplane looked “normal” on final approach. He heard the main landing gear touch down, followed by “something dragging.” After the airplane came to rest, he checked on the condition of the pilot, then attempted to remove the airplane from the runway. During the attempt to move the airplane from the runway, they lifted the nose off the ground, tried unsuccessfully to get the nose landing gear into the down and locked position, and ultimately strapped the landing gear in place to move the airplane. Examination of the airplane by a Federal Aviation Administration maintenance inspector revealed substantial damage, including buckling of the airframe on both sides of the nose landing gear well, and abrasion through to the airframe on the bottom of the nose and fuselage. The nose landing gear actuator was removed for detailed examination. The actuator was tested in the locked and unlocked position at the correct pressures with no leaks or discrepancies noted.; however, the green safe switch remained illuminated during the entire test, indicating a defective switch. The switch was brittle and appeared “very old.” A review of the airframe maintenance logbook revealed that, during the most recent annual inspection on July 10, 2017, a landing gear retraction test was conducted per the manufacturer’s service manual with no defects noted. On April 27, 2018, a logbook entry showed a main landing gear irregularity that was corrected. The landing gear was cycled 10 times with no defects noted with the nose landing gear. The pilot reported that the flight was uneventful and during the approach for landing, he placed the landing gear handle in the down position and observed three green landing gear lights, indicating that the gear was down and locked. Shortly after touchdown, the nose landing gear collapsed into the retracted position. The airplane’s nose impacted the runway and the airplane skidded to a stop, resulting in substantial damage to the airframe. After the airplane stopped, the landing gear position lights indicated that all of the landing gear were extended and locked into position. A mechanic who saw the landing and assisted in removing the airplane from the runway after the accident reported that, during the attempt to move the airplane, they lifted the nose off the ground and tried unsuccessfully to move the nose landing gear into the down and locked position. Postaccident testing of the nose landing gear actuator revealed no discrepancies. Although the green safe switch remained illuminated during the entire testing cycle, indicating a defective switch, this did not directly contribute to the collapse of the nose landing gear. Review of maintenance records showed no nose gear discrepancies over the previous 18 months. The reason for the nose landing gear collapse could not be determined based on the available information. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- — Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Nose/tail landing gear-Malfunction
- — Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Gear position and warning-Malfunction
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2018_ERA18LA154.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…