ERA19LA008
2018-10-05 · Stonewall, Mississippi, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The fatigue failure of the No. 3 cylinder exhaust valve, which resulted in a fractured camshaft and a total loss of engine power.
Factual narrative
On October 5, 2018, about 1445 central daylight time, a North American Navion A, N969TR, was substantially damaged during a forced landing near Stonewall, Mississippi. The private pilot was not injured. The airplane was registered to the pilot and was being operated as Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed for the flight that departed Key Field Airport (MEI), Meridian, Mississippi, at 1438, and was destined for Jack Edwards National Airport (JKA), Gulf Shores, Alabama.The pilot stated that he was flying at 3,500 ft when the engine sputtered. He informed air traffic control that he wanted to return to MEI and turned back toward the airport, but the engine stopped producing power. The pilot realized that he was not going to be able to reach MEI or any other airport and made a forced landing to a highway. The pilot said he bled off airspeed to avoid hitting cars and landed hard. The airplane's landing gear collapsed, and the airplane slid about 200 ft and came to rest upright on the road, which resulted in substantial damage to the fuselage. A postaccident examination of the engine revealed the No. 3 cylinder exhaust valve fractured where the stem transitioned to the valve head. The valve head was found lodged between the crankcase and the camshaft, and the camshaft was fractured between the No. 3 intake and exhaust lobes. Metallurgical examination of the liberated valve head and the valve stem revealed that the valve head was damaged from repeated contact with the piston and the valve stem exhibited fracture surfaces consistent with fatigue. The fatigue cracking propagated through the valve stem, initiating at multiple crack initiation sites on the stem surface. The valve stem also exhibited tapering near the fracture surface, and surface oxidation and deposits of lead-based compounds which were also present on the exterior of the stem adjacent to the fracture surface. A small depressed area was also noted on the top face of the valve stem, which was consistent with repeated contact with the adjacent rocker. The last annual inspection of the airplane and engine was on August 1, 2018. At the time of the accident, the engine had accrued a total of 1,705.0 hours and 641.5 hours since overhaul. Further review of the engine maintenance logbook revealed that on May 4, 2014, at an engine total time of 1,390.4 hours and 322.1 hours since overhaul, a mechanic "removed and reinstalled all six cylinders with new base seals, push rod tubes seals, intake tube seals, exhaust gaskets and rocker gaskets after resurfacing valves and seats." The pilot stated that, while en route to his destination, the airplane's engine sputtered and then lost total power. During the subsequent forced landing to a highway, the airplane landed hard, and the landing gear collapsed; the airplane sustained substantial damage to the fuselage. A postaccident examination of the engine revealed the No. 3 cylinder exhaust valve fractured where the stem transitioned to the valve head seat. The valve head impacted the No. 3 piston and became lodged between the crankcase and the camshaft, which resulted in the fracture of the camshaft. Fatigue cracking, which initiated at multiple sites, propagated through the valve stem. The presence of a tapered stem near the fracture surface, high temperature oxide deposits, and fatigue striations on the fracture surface suggested that the stem underwent spallation or erosion of the oxides formed during high temperature exposure, which would reduce the stem cross-section over time, increasing the likelihood of initiating fatigue cracking. Additionally, a localized area of wear on the top face of the valve stem was most likely due to the valve not rotating during operation, which could create hot spots or improper thermal dissipation in the hottest parts of the valve and lead to valve damage or failure. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Engine (reciprocating)-(general)-Failure - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Engine (reciprocating)-Recip eng cyl section-Failure - C
- C Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Engine (reciprocating)-Recip eng cyl section-Fatigue/wear/corrosion - C
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2018_ERA19LA008.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.