ERA19LA119
2019-03-05 · Stateboro, Georgia, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport TBR
N101WV has since been reassigned. It is now registered to a different aircraft (DJI AGRAS T25), which was not involved in this event.
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot’s loss of airplane control while on final approach in gusty wind conditions.
Factual narrative
On March 5, 2019, about 1500 eastern standard time, an experimental amateur-built Velocity RG, N101WV, was destroyed by a postcrash fire after it impacted an approach lighting system and terrain while landing at the Statesboro-Bulloch County Airport (TBR), Statesboro, Georgia. The commercial pilot was not injured, and the flight instructor sustained minor injuries. The airplane was operated by Mission Hardware Ltd as an instructional flight conducted under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. Day visual meteorological conditions prevailed, no flight plan was filed for the flight, which originated from Savannah-Hilton Head International Airport (SAV), Savannah, Georgia, about 1400. According to the pilot, he was receiving instruction and transition training for the Velocity RG from a flight instructor. After performing a series of maneuvers while en route from SAV, they entered a left downwind for runway 32 at TBR. They intended to practice takeoff and landings before returning to SAV. The pilot stated they were on a stabilized final approach at about 100 knots, into a headwind that was gusting to 18 knots. He noted that the typical approach speed in the velocity is 80 knots. On short final approach, the airplane sank abruptly and lost about 20 knots of airspeed, about 15-20 ft above ground level (agl). The pilot initiated a go-around procedure, added additional power and full aft stick. The airplane appeared to climb when the right main landing gear struck an approach light. The airplane then "pancaked" onto the runway and rotated clockwise before coming to a stop. The pilot and the flight instructor then exited the airplane before a postcrash fire ensued. The flight instructor provided a similar description of the approach, and stated that just before the airplane's nose pitched down, while flying at about 15 to 20 feet above ground level, the pilot was flying the airplane at an airspeed around 90 knots. The flight instructor further stated that he typically flew approached in the accident airplane make and model at an airspeed that was 10 to 15 knots faster than the airplane's stall speed of 70 knots, and would typically add an additional 10 knots of airspeed for approaches in gusty or crosswind conditions. Both pilots stated they believed they encountered wind shear on short final approach. A Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector responded to the accident site and examined the wreckage. The majority of the wreckage was consumed by fire. The winglets and propeller, at the rear of the airplane, were the only portions of the airplane that did not exhibit thermal damage. The airplane came to rest to the right of the runway in the grass. There were multiple gouges in the ground starting at the landing lights leading towards the runway. The pilot held a commercial pilot certificate with ratings for airplane single- and multiengine land, instrument airplane, and rotorcraft-helicopter. He held a flight instructor certificate with a rating for airplane single-engine, and instrument airplane. He held a mechanic certificate with airframe and powerplant ratings. His most recent FAA second-class medical certificate was issued December 5, 2018. He reported 4,300 total hours of flight experience on that date. The flight instructor held a commercial pilot certificate with ratings for airplane single- and multiengine land, and airplane instrument. He held a flight instructor certificate with ratings for airplane single-engine and instrument airplane. He held a repairman experimental aircraft builder certificate for the accident airplane make and model. His most recent FAA first-class medical certificate was issued September 11, 2017. He reported 1,790 total hours of flight experience on that date. The four-seat, single-engine, low-wing, canard-equipped airplane was built in 1995. It was powered by a Lycoming IO-360, 180-horsepower engine. A review of the airplane's maintenance records revealed that the most recent condition inspection was completed on January 17, 2019. At 1455, the weather conditions reported at TBR included, wind from 320° at 13 knots, visibility 10 statute miles, clear skies, temperature 13° C, dew point -1° C, and an altimeter setting of 30.05 inches of mercury. At 1435, about 25 minutes before the accident, the winds were 320° at 13 knots, gusting to 16 knots. At 1515, about 15 minutes after the accident, the winds were 320° at 9 knots, gusting to 20 knots. The FAA Airplane Flying Handbook (FAA-H-8083-3B), states for landing in turbulent conditions, us a power-on approach at an airspeed slightly above the normal approach speed. This provides for more positive control of the airplane when strong horizontal wind gusts, or up and down drafts, are experienced. One procedure is to use the normal approach speed plus one-half of the wind gust factors. The pilot and instructor were on final approach for landing in gusting wind conditions when, about 20 ft above the ground, the airplane's nose dropped and the airplane abruptly lost 20 knots of airspeed. They initiated a go-around, but the airplane's landing gear impacted the runway approach lights, and the airplane subsequently impacted the runway and departed the right side; a postcrash fire consumed a majority of the airplane. Given the wind conditions, the abrupt loss of airspeed, and the subsequent loss of pitch control, it is likely that the airplane encountered windshear while on short final approach with insufficent altitude available to recover. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- C Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Aircraft control-Pilot - C
- — Environmental issues-Conditions/weather/phenomena-Wind-Gusts-Effect on operation
- — Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Descent rate-Not attained/maintained
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2019_ERA19LA119.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (wind shear, stall, go-around, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Optimal recovery from microburst wind shear
The flight path of a twin-jet transport aircraft is optimized in a microburst encounter during approach to landing. The objective is to execute an escape maneuver that maintains safe ground clearance …
- NASA NTRS 2013 · Conference Paper Optimal nonlinear estimation for aircraft flight control in wind shear
The most recent results in an ongoing research effort at Princeton in the area of flight dynamics in wind shear are described.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation