ERA21LA091
2020-12-27 · Pleasant Valley, New York, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport 44N
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A total loss of engine power due to failure of the magnetos, which were not overhauled in accordance with the manufacturer’s time specifications.
Factual narrative
On December 27, 2020, about 1520 eastern standard time, a Cessna 172C, N8311X, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Pleasant Valley, New York. The pilot was not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 instructional flight. According to the student pilot, after a normal preflight inspection she departed with 27 gallons of fuel and planned to remain in the traffic pattern to practice takeoffs and landings. On the downwind leg of the traffic pattern the tachometer indication dropped out of the normal operating range so she announced over the radio that she was experiencing an engine malfunction. She deployed partial flaps and turned the carburetor heat ON. Shortly thereafter, on final approach, the engine sputtered and lost all power. The student pilot performed the emergency checklist, cycled the magnetos, declared an emergency and performed a forced landing in a wooded area. The airplane came to rest inverted in swampy terrain amongst trees and sustained substantial damage to the wings and fuselage. The wreckage recovery was delayed about 8 months. During this time the propeller, instruments from the instrument panel, and the left yoke were taken from the airplane and not recovered. The last entry in the engine logbook stated all of the lower spark plugs were replaced due to “rough mag[neto] drop on run up” about 4 months before the accident. The airplane accumulated about 9 hours between the time the maintenance was performed and the accident. A postaccident examination was conducted during which the engine’s crankshaft was rotated by hand, and internal and valvetrain continuity was established. Examination of the cylinders with a lighted borescope revealed no anomalies. The cylinders and spark plugs contained dirt and debris from the swamp. The impulse coupling magnetos did not produce spark when turned by hand. The magnetos were removed and placed on a test bench; neither magneto produced a spark. Further examination of the magnetos revealed extensive corrosion present on the coil laminations. The left magneto had rust, debris, and corrosion present in the magneto and distributor gear housing; extensive rust was found around the coil laminations, housing, and the magnet. The right magneto had rust on the coil lamination and arcing throughout the distributor gear. The exterior housing of the magnetos was undamaged. The Champion Aerospace Magneto Maintenance and Overhaul Manual states the magneto time in service allowance is the Time Before Overhaul for the engine or 12 years. According to maintenance records, the engine was overhauled in 1984, 36 years prior to the accident. The right magneto was manufactured in 2006, the left magneto in 1997, 14 and 23 years respectively, before the accident. The student pilot was practicing takeoffs and landings when the engine sputtered and lost all power while on final approach. The student pilot tried to restart the engine to no avail and subsequently made a forced landing in a wooded area. The airplane came to rest inverted in swampy terrain amongst trees. The magnetos were removed from the engine during the postaccident examination, and they failed to produce sparks when tested. Further examination of the magnetos revealed extensive corrosion present on the coil laminations between the coil and magnet. It is likely the rotor was unable to transmit electricity to the coil and therefore the magneto was unable to produce a spark. The magneto manufacturer maintenance manual and overhaul manual states the magneto time in service allowance is the time before overhaul for the engine or 12 years. The magnetos had not been overhauled and were 14 and 23 years old. No other engine anomalies were identified that would have prevented normal operation. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- — Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Ignition system-Magneto/distributor-Failure
- — Personnel issues-Task performance-Maintenance-Scheduled/routine maintenance-Owner/builder
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2020_ERA21LA091.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing, maintenance). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2023 · Reprint (Version printed in journal) Finite Element Simulation of Three Full-Scale Crash Tests for Cessna 172 Aircraft
The NASA Emergency Locator Transmitter Survivability and Reliability project was initiated in 2013 to assess the crash performance standards for the next generation of emergency locator transmitter (E…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Crash Testing and Simulation of a Cessna 172 Aircraft: Pitch Down Impact Onto Soft Soil
During the summer of 2015, NASA Langley Research Center conducted three full-scale crash tests of Cessna 172 (C-172) aircraft at the NASA Langley Landing and Impact Research (LandIR) Facility.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Technical Memorandum (TM) Simulating the Impact Response of Three Full-Scale Crash Tests of Cessna 172 Aircraft
During the summer of 2015, a series of three full-scale crash tests were performed at the Landing and Impact Research Facility located at NASA Langley Research Center of Cessna 172 aircraft.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Faculty research project Reconfigurable Guidance and Control Systems for Emerging On-Orbit Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing (OSAM) Space Vehicles
Dynamic response to emergent situations is a necessity in the on-orbit servicing, assembly, and manufacturing (OSAM) field, because traditional on-orbit guidance and control (G&C) cannot respond effic…
- Semantic Scholar 2020 · Article (Collegiate Aviation Review International) From Classroom to Industry: Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Decision-Making
The presence of human factors in aviation remains a critical area of research given the safety implications of human error.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2019 · Journal article (IJAAA) Satellite Maintenance: An Opportunity to Minimize the Kessler Effect
Recently, there has been an emphasis on the growing problem of orbital debris. While the advantages of placing satellites into space are numerous, advances in satellite technology combined with the gr…