ERA22LA099
2022-01-01 · Southeast Arcadia, Florida, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport X06
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The total loss of engine power for reasons that could not be determined based on the available evidence for this investigation.
Factual narrative
On January 1, 2022, about 1211 eastern standard time, a Mooney M20C, N79396, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Arcadia Municipal Airport (X06), Arcadia, Florida. The private pilot and the passenger sustained minor injuries. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot stated that he performed a preflight inspection before departing from Pilot Country Airport (X05), Brooksville, Florida, about 1100. He verified that the airplane had 19 gallons of fuel onboard, which he determined was sufficient to complete the 76.5-nautical mile flight (and have a 1-hour reserve) to X06, where he planned to purchase fuel. The pilot stated that the flight to X06 was uneventful until he turned onto final approach to land. He indicated that, with the fuel selector set to the right-wing tank while the airplane was at an altitude of 300 to 400 ft, the engine suddenly stopped producing power. The pilot reported that the fuel gauge showed about 4 gallons of fuel in the right tank and that the fuel boost pump was turned on. The pilot also reported that the carburetor ice temperature sensor indicated 60°F. The pilot stated that the airplane was unable to maintain altitude and that he landed in a field adjacent to the runway. The right wing and left horizontal stabilizer struck a tree, which resulted in substantial damage. The pilot reported a strong smell of fuel as he and the passenger were exiting the airplane. According to recovery personnel, both wing fuel tanks were breached from impact and contained no usable fuel. A test run of the engine found that the engine ran normally through all power settings. Postaccident examination of the engine revealed no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. A review of the airplane’s fueling history revealed that the pilot last fueled the airplane with 41.8 gallons of 100 low-lead fuel 5 days before the accident. The airplane has a total usable fuel load of 52 gallons. The pilot stated that he had flown about 4 hours since last refueling the airplane. The pilot reported that he was making a personal flight and that he would buy fuel after arriving at the destination airport. While on final approach to land, the engine suddenly stopped producing power. The pilot stated that the fuel gauge showed about 4 gallons of fuel in the right tank (the fuel selector was set to the right-wing tank) and that the fuel boost pump was turned on. The pilot stated that the airplane was unable to maintain altitude and that he performed a forced landing to a field, during which the right wing and fuselage were substantially damaged. Postaccident engine test runs found that the engine performed normally through all power settings. Postaccident examination of the engine revealed no evidence of any preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. Although the weather conditions at the time of the accident were conducive to the accumulation of carburetor icing at glide power, the pilot reported that the carburetor heat temperature gauge indicated 60°F. The pilot reported that he had flown about 4 hours since last refueling the airplane and that the airplane had 19 gallons of fuel for the flight. According to these numbers, the airplane would have burned about 8.0 to 8.5 gallons of fuel per hour. As such, the airplane would have had enough fuel to complete the 76.5-nautical mile flight. Because the airplane had sufficient fuel to complete the flight and no mechanical issues were identified that would have precluded normal operation, the reason for the loss of engine power could not be determined based on the available evidence for this accident. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- — Not determined-Not determined-(general)-(general)-Unknown/Not determined
- — Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Engine (reciprocating)-(general)-Failure
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2022_ERA22LA099.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing). All research papers
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Enabling Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight Drones Operation over Open RAN 5G Networks with Slicing
Among the foretold claims of the transition from 5G to 6G, Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight (BVLoS) drone operation has emerged as a prominent Internet-of-Robots enabler.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR) Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for UAV-Assisted 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Study of MAPPO, MADDPG, and MADQN
The growing demand for robust, scalable wireless networks in the 5G-and-beyond era has led to the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as mobile base stations to enhance coverage in dense urb…
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Presentation NASA Icing Update – March 2025
This NASA Icing Update was prepared for presentation to the SAE International AC-9C Inflight Icing Technology Committee. This update includes the following topics: planned Rotational Icing Scaling tes…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER) A Mathematical Model on the Temporal Dynamics of Aviation Competitive Pricing
This study investigates the competitive dynamics of airport pricing using U.S. airport data to validate the findings. It employs linear and nonlinear ordinary differential equation models to analyze t…
- arXiv 2024 · arXiv preprint An energy-stable phase-field model for droplet icing simulations
A phase-field model for three-phase flows is established by combining the Navier-Stokes (NS) and the energy equations, with the Allen-Cahn (AC) and Cahn-Hilliard (CH) equations and is demonstrated ana…