ERA22LA411
2022-09-03 · Clearfield, Pennsylvania, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport FIG
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A sudden partial loss of engine power for undetermined reasons, which resulted in an off-airport landing.
Factual narrative
On September 3, 2022, about 1635 eastern daylight time, a Cessna 172M, N9619H, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Clearfield, Pennsylvania. The private pilot and passenger were not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. In a written statement provided to the National Transportation Safety Board, the pilot reported that the airplane had 42 gallons of fuel onboard. He completed a preflight inspection, and the engine run-up was normal. During initial climb, about 300 ft above ground level, the engine began shaking and lost all power. The pilot lowered the nose and saw that the airplane was still over the runway but too close to the end to land on the remaining runway. He then made a “hard” left turn in an attempt to land on the runway in the opposite direction; however, the airplane impacted a field. According to a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector, the pilot reported that the engine lost partial power, and during the 180° left turn back to the airport, he moved the fuel selector to off in preparation for an off-airport impact. The engine subsequently lost all power, and the airplane impacted a field, coming to rest upright in a wooded area at the edge of the field. The inspector examined the wreckage and observed substantial damage to both wings and the fuselage. After the wreckage was recovered, the FAA inspector further examined the engine and noted no compression on the No. 1 cylinder and 24/80 psi compression on the No. 3 cylinder; however, the compression test was done when the engine was cold. The inspector further stated that he was able to start the engine and run it at idle power, but he did not attempt to increase engine power due to a bent propeller. He subsequently removed the Nos. 1 and 3 cylinders and noted scoring on the No. 1 piston skirt and cylinder wall. The inspector and a representative from the engine manufacturer (who viewed the FAA inspector’s photographs) stated that the scoring was consistent with tappet to camshaft wearing. Review of maintenance records revealed that the most recent annual inspection was completed on August 4, 2022. At that time, the engine had accumulated 1,718 hours since its most recent major overhaul, which was performed in December 2009. During initial climb, about 300 ft above ground level, the airplane’s engine began shaking and lost partial power. The pilot lowered the nose and saw that the airplane was still over the runway but too close to the end to land on the remaining runway. He made a “hard” left turn in an attempt to land on the runway in the opposite direction. He also turned the fuel selector to off in preparation for an off-airport impact. The engine subsequently lost all power (due to the fuel being turned off), and the airplane impacted a field, coming to rest upright in a wooded area at the edge of the field. A postaccident compression check performed when the engine was cold revealed no compression on the No. 1 cylinder and low compression on the No. 3 cylinder; however, the engine was subsequently started and run at idle power, with no anomalies noted. After shutdown, removal of the Nos. 1 and 3 cylinders revealed scoring on the No. 1 piston skirt and cylinder wall. The scoring was consistent with material entering the cylinder as a result of tappet to camshaft wearing, which also would have affected the intake and exhaust valves opening and closing properly. While this condition may have reduced the engine’s ability to produce full takeoff power; it would not have resulted in the sudden loss of engine performance described by the pilot. Given the engine’s subsequent normal operation postaccident, the reason for the partial loss of engine power could not be determined. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- — Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Engine (reciprocating)-Recip engine power section-Fatigue/wear/corrosion
- — Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Power plant-(general)-Unknown/Not determined
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2022_ERA22LA411.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2023 · Reprint (Version printed in journal) Finite Element Simulation of Three Full-Scale Crash Tests for Cessna 172 Aircraft
The NASA Emergency Locator Transmitter Survivability and Reliability project was initiated in 2013 to assess the crash performance standards for the next generation of emergency locator transmitter (E…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Crash Testing and Simulation of a Cessna 172 Aircraft: Pitch Down Impact Onto Soft Soil
During the summer of 2015, NASA Langley Research Center conducted three full-scale crash tests of Cessna 172 (C-172) aircraft at the NASA Langley Landing and Impact Research (LandIR) Facility.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Technical Memorandum (TM) Simulating the Impact Response of Three Full-Scale Crash Tests of Cessna 172 Aircraft
During the summer of 2015, a series of three full-scale crash tests were performed at the Landing and Impact Research Facility located at NASA Langley Research Center of Cessna 172 aircraft.
- Semantic Scholar 2020 · Article (Collegiate Aviation Review International) From Classroom to Industry: Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Decision-Making
The presence of human factors in aviation remains a critical area of research given the safety implications of human error.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation