ERA23LA013
2022-10-08 · Woodstock, Virginia, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport VG55
Current FAA registration · N520RJ
- Make / Model
- SCHEMPP-HIRTH DISCUS CS
- Year of manufacture
- 1996 · 26 years old at event
- Engine
- AMA/EXPR UNKNOWN ENG
- Seats / Engines
- 1 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19960604
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A68A6E
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
Improper repair of a crack by maintenance personnel, which resulted in a subsequent failure of the glider canopy.
Factual narrative
On October 8, 2022, about 0950 eastern daylight time, an experimental Schempp-Hirth Discus CS glider, N520RJ, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Woodstock, Virginia. The private pilot was not injured. The glider was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot reported that the glider was at 3,700 ft mean sea level when the canopy suddenly, without warning, separated from the glider. The pilot double-checked the canopy latch and jettison handle and confirmed that he did not jettison the canopy. He subsequently landed uneventfully at his intended destination airport. Review of maintenance records revealed a work order dated August 9, 2020, which stated “…Found canopy crack at rear hinge along frame and stop holed crack….” Separated sections of the glider canopy were recovered and forwarded to the National Transportation Safety Board Materials Laboratory, Washington, D.C. Metallurgical examination revealed that the drilled hole appeared to halt progression of the original crack along its initial propagation direction. However, both the primary separation crack and a secondary crack propagated out of the hole in diametrically opposite directions, consistent with occurrence due to a stress state along the same plane. Additionally, both cracks propagated from internal surface corners of the hole, consistent with the corners acting as stress risers that facilitated crack initiation (for more information, see Materials Laboratory Factual Report in the public docket for this accident). According to a representative from the glider manufacturer, the canopy was made from plexiglass and there are no manufacturer instructions for repairing cracks in the canopy. Additionally, it has been common practice for decades that cracks in the plexiglass are drilled out to stop the crack progression as a temporary solution; however, for a proper repair, the canopy must be removed and re-glued. The pilot reported that the glider was at 3,700 ft mean sea level when the canopy suddenly, without warning, separated from the glider. He subsequently landed uneventfully at his intended destination airport. Review of maintenance records revealed that about 2 years before the accident, a maintenance facility stop-drilled a hole to correct a canopy crack at the rear hinge along the glide frame. Metallurgical examination revealed that the drilled hole appeared to halt progression of the original crack along its initial propagation direction. However, both the new primary separation crack and a secondary crack propagated from the hole in diametrically opposite directions, which suggests they likely developed due to a stress state along the same plane. Additionally, both cracks propagated from internal surface corners of the hole, indicating the corners likely acted as stress risers that facilitated crack initiation. There was no approved method from the glider manufacturer to stop-drill a hole in plexiglass; however, manufacturer approval was not required as the glider was registered in the experimental category. The glider manufacturer stated that it was common practice for cracks in the plexiglass to be drilled-out to stop the crack progression as a temporary solution; however, for a proper repair, the canopy must be removed and re-glued. The presence of multiple cracks propagating out of the same stress riser of the internal hole corner indicated that the specific hole drilled did not prevent subsequent progression of further cracking and the eventual separation of the canopy. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- — Personnel issues-Task performance-Maintenance-Repair-Maintenance personnel
- — Aircraft-Aircraft structures-Doors-Passenger/crew doors-Failure
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2022_ERA23LA013.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…