ERA23LA179
2023-03-22 · Lakeland, Florida, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport X23
Current FAA registration · N1907A
- Make / Model
- PIPER PA-18AS-125
- Year of manufacture
- 1952 · 71 years old at event
- Engine
- LYCOMING 0-290 SERIES (140 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 2 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 20150115
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A16B79
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot’s failure to ensure that the landing gear was properly configured for a water landing.
Factual narrative
On March 22, 2023, about 1648 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-18AS, N1907A, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident on Crescent Lake in Umatilla, Florida. The pilot was not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. According to the pilot, he departed from his home base on Crescent Lake to refuel. Upon landing at Umatilla Airport (X23), he observed a small hydraulic fluid leak on the hand pump of the main landing gear while taxiing for fuel. After refueling, he proceeded to depart back to Crescent Lake. However, during the landing on the lake, he noticed that the nose landing gear was not fully retracted. When the nose gear contacted the water, the airplane flipped over and inverted. Following the accident, the pilot reported that the landing gear hand pump had failed to raise the landing gear as expected, and that an o-ring failure resulted in the pump leaking hydraulic fluid. An examination of the airplane by a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector revealed substantial damage to the right wing. Examination of the landing gear hydraulic system revealed a small amount of hydraulic fluid leaking from the landing gear hand pump, but that the leak was not significant enough to deplete the hydraulic system’s fluid. The inspector also identified wear marks on the hand pump shaft, but none that would have resulted in a failure of the pump. A review of the maintenance records indicated that an annual inspection had been conducted about five months before the accident, and no discrepancies were noted regarding the hydraulic system. According to the float manufacturer, the airplane’s gear selector was equipped with lights that indicated the landing gear position. Four blue lights illuminated when the gear was up, and four green lights illuminated when the gear was down. Additionally, a single red light indicated the operation of the hydraulic pump. Each gear position had its corresponding light. The hydraulic pump remained active until all landing gear components reached their intended positions. Although the floats did not have “locks," they did include an over-center main gear and a horizontally positioned nose gear system. Furthermore, the eight indicator lights operated independently of the gear hydraulic system and its functionality. A review of the airplane’s flight manual supplement, specifically on page 8, 9 and 13, stated: "Do not land on water unless the gear is fully retracted." After obtaining fuel at a land-based airport, the pilot noted a small leak in the amphibious airplane’s hydraulic landing gear extension/retraction system. He subsequently departed for the accident flight. While the pilot was landing the airplane on a lake, he noticed that the landing gear were still extended; the airplane flipped over immediately upon touchdown and the airplane’s right wing was substantially damaged. Examination of the hydraulic system after the accident confirmed the small leak, but otherwise did not reveal evidence of a failure of the system. Additionally, the airplane was equipped with landing gear position indicating lights that should have alerted the pilot that the landing gear were not fully retracted before touchdown. Had the pilot observed this indication prior to landing, he would likely have aborted the landing attempt and prevented the accident. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- — Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Landing gear system-Wheel/ski/float-Incorrect use/operation
- — Personnel issues-Action/decision-Action-Lack of action-Pilot
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2023_ERA23LA179.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…