ERA25LA030
2024-10-17 · Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport AOO
Current FAA registration · N511JG
- Make / Model
- ZENITH ZODIAC 601 HDS
- Year of manufacture
- 2002 · 22 years old at event
- Engine
- CONT MOTOR C90 SERIES (95 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 2 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 20020926
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S A665F5
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The total loss of engine power due to fuel starvation as a result of a deteriorated gascolator gasket. Contributing was the failure of the mechanic to replace the gasket during the most recent condition inspection.
Factual narrative
On October 17, 2024, at 1515 eastern daylight time, an experimental amateur-built Zenith Zodiac 601HDS airplane, N511JG, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Altoona, Pennsylvania. The private pilot was not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The private pilot reported that there were no irregularities noted with the airplane during the preflight inspection, engine run-up, or taxi before departing from runway 3 at Altoona/Blair County Airport (AOO), Altoona, Pennsylvania. The pilot intended to remain in the airport traffic pattern; however, during the initial climb, when the airplane was climbing through 300 ft above ground level, the engine started to “misfire,” then immediately stopped producing power. Unable to troubleshoot due to the low altitude, the pilot lowered the nose and attempted a forced landing on the remaining runway. The airplane landed hard and the landing gear collapsed, which resulted in the wings and airframe buckling. The airplane then skidded to a stop on the side of the runway. Examination of the airplane revealed signatures to the propeller that were consistent with a lack of rotation during the impact; the engine was intact. Engine crankshaft and valvetrain continuity was established and compression was attained on each cylinder. Both magnetos produced spark at each of the posts. A subsequent examination of the fuel system revealed 10 gallons of fuel on board. In addition, the fuel gascolator was installed partially outside of the engine compartment, exposing it to the air slipstream. The gascolator exhibited features consistent with a fuel leak. The gascolator bowl was not completely secure to the upper portion of the gascolator and it would leak fuel when lightly touched by hand. The gascolator was opened and the gasket at the top of the bowl was found to be stiff and cracked. A review of maintenance records documented an annual condition inspection had been completed about 10 days before the accident. The logbook entry did not document any maintenance or inspection to the gascolator specifically, but the fuel system inspection was documented and tested, yielding no leaks. Shortly after takeoff, as the airplane was climbing through 300 ft above ground level, the engine misfired, then suddenly stopped producing power. Unable to troubleshoot due to the low altitude, the pilot lowered the nose and attempted a forced landing on the remaining runway. The airplane landed hard, collapsing the landing gear and damaging the wings and airframe. Postaccident examination of the airplane did not reveal any engine anomalies; however, an examination of the fuel system revealed the fuel gascolator was installed partially outside of the engine compartment, exposing it to the air slipstream. The gascolator exhibited features consistent with a fuel leak. The gascolator bowl was not completely secure to the upper portion of the gascolator and it leaked fuel when touched by hand. The most recent engine maintenance was completed about 10 days before the accident and, although the fuel gascolator gasket was not mentioned in the logbook entry, a fuel system inspection was documented. The condition of the gasket would have warranted replacement. The gascolator bowl gasket was stiff and cracked, which likely allowed fuel to leak out during the flight, starving the engine of fuel. The circumstances of the accident are consistent with a total loss of engine power due to fuel starvation, which resulted in a loss of engine power and hard landing. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12
NTSB Findings
FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.
- — Aircraft-Aircraft systems-Fuel system-Fuel distribution-Damaged/degraded
- — Personnel issues-Task performance-Inspection-Scheduled/routine inspection-Maintenance personnel
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2024_ERA25LA030.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, fuel starvation, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.