Skip to content

ERA25LA111

2025-02-05 · New Lexington, Ohio, United States · Serious · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed

Airport I86

Current FAA registration · N406SR

Make / Model
CIRRUS DESIGN SR22
Year of manufacture
2006 · 19 years old at event
Engine
CONT MOTOR IO-550-N (310 hp)
Seats / Engines
4 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
20061227
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A4C48B

Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).

Aircraft involved

Probable cause & findings

The pilot’s flight into previously forecasted freezing rain, which resulted in ice accretion, reduced forward visibility, and a subsequent landing undershoot.

Factual narrative

The pilot obtained a preflight weather briefing package over 3 hours before departure on his first of two planned flight legs. The briefing indicated that freezing rain was forecast later that afternoon. He believed he would have more than enough time to make the first flight, perform his function at the destination airport, and fly the return leg while avoiding the freezing rain. Less than an hour after his briefing, and before departure on the first uneventful flight leg, the Aviation Weather Center issued graphical products specifying that freezing rain was forecast along the planned route and during the time of the planned returned leg. Before departing for the return (accident) flight leg, the pilot reviewed hourly surface observations at nearby airports along with weather radar returns on his tablet computer. After departing for the visual flight rules flight, he noted adverse weather and deviated to the east while “staying low.” He then encountered an area of freezing rain and turned on the airplane’s (weeping wing) ice protection system, flew through the area of freezing rain, turned further east, and continued the flight. The airplane again encountered freezing rain resulting in more ice accretion. Recognizing the need to land, the pilot diverted to an alternate airport and although the windshield defroster was functioning and “full heat and 3rd stage of [the] fan [were] on,” the freezing rain overcame the defroster’s ability and the windshield became obscured with ice, which reduced his forward visibility. The pilot flew over the alternate airport and entered a normal airport traffic pattern for landing. He was initially able to view the runway out of the airplane’s side window, but he lost sight of the runway when he turned onto final approach. The airplane subsequently touched down in a field about 385 ft short of the runway threshold. The pilot was seriously injured and airplane’s right wing was substantially damaged during the accident sequence. The pilot reported that there were no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures of the airplane or its systems. He further stated that if he had known the flight was going to be in icing conditions he would not have departed. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database Retrieved: 2026-02-12

NTSB Findings

FAA avdata. C = Cause, F = Factor.

  • — Environmental issues-Conditions/weather/phenomena-Ceiling/visibility/precip-Freezing rain/sleet-Effect on operation
  • — Personnel issues-Action/decision-Info processing/decision-Decision making/judgment-Pilot

Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file NTSB_2025_ERA25LA111.txt. Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb. Full investigation docket on data.ntsb.gov ↗.

Related research

Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing). All research papers