FTW03LA006
2002-10-06 · Midland, Texas, United States · Serious · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport MAF
N2069W has since been reassigned. It is now registered to a different aircraft (CESSNA 208B, built 2018), which was not involved in this event.
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The loss of engine power resulting from a loose "B" nut on the line going from the bleed air filter to the fuel control unit. Also causal was the inadequate maintenence of the fuel control unit and filters during the last conditional inspection.
Factual narrative
On October 6, 2002, approximately 1615 central daylight time, a SIAI-Marchetti, single-engine airplane, N2069W, struck power lines during a forced landing following a loss of engine power during takeoff at the Midland International Airport, near Midland, Texas. The airplane was owned by a private individual and flown by the pilot under Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. The airline transport rated pilot received serious injuries, the passenger received minor injuries, and the airplane sustained substantial damage. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the local air show flight, and a flight plan was not filed. The flight departed Midland approximately 5 minutes prior to the accident. Local authorities reported that the airplane struck the power lines, hit the westbound lane of Business Highway 80, skidded across both westbound lanes, and came to rest in an eastbound lane with the turbine operating. The pilot reported that during the takeoff/initial climb, the engine "spooled down" to flight idle then regained power momentarily; however, the engine would not gain enough torque to sustain flight. During the emergency landing, the airplane came in contact with power lines and impacted the ground in a level attitude. The FAA inspector, who responded to the accident site, found the airplane resting in the eastbound lane of the highway short of runway 34R. The main landing gear were collapsed and pushed upward through the bottom of the aircraft. The engine gearbox and the propeller assembly were found sheared from the engine. The Allison engine, model 250-B15G, serial number CAE-850098, and accessories were examined by the FAA inspector. According to the FAA inspector, on the front of the high pressure compressor at the bleed air filter (Pruroflow part/number 211-3993) the "B" nut was found "finger" loose on the line going from the bleed air filter to the fuel control unit. According to the manufacturer's representative, the recommended torque specification was 80 inch-pounds for the "B" nut, and the engine "condition described [by the pilot] could be caused by a leak in the bleed air system." The maintenance records were reviewed by the FAA inspector. On July 19, 2003, during the last conditional inspection, the fuel control unit was removed, reinstalled and the fuel control unit and all filters were checked. The mechanic, who performed the conditional inspection, stated that during his removal and reinstallation of the fuel control unit, he removed the fuel and bleed air lines at the fuel control unit. According to the FAA inspector, the airplane had flown approximately 5 hours since the last conditional inspection. Numerous attempts to obtain the completed Pilot/Operator Aircraft Accident Report (NTSB Form 6120.1/2) were unsuccessful. The airplane struck power lines during a forced landing following a loss of engine power during the takeoff/initial climb. The pilot reported that the engine lost power to flight idle then regained power momentarily; however, the engine would not gain enough torque to sustain flight. Examination revealed that the "B" nut was "finger" loose on the line going from the bleed air filter to the fuel control unit. According to the manufacturer's representative, the recommended torque specification was 80 inch-pounds for the "B" nut, and the engine "condition described [by the pilot] could be caused by a leak in the bleed air system." During the last conditional inspection, the fuel control unit was removed for overhaul and reinstalled, and the fuel control unit and all filters were checked. The mechanic, who performed the conditional inspection, stated that during his removal and reinstallation of the fuel control unit, he removed the fuel and bleed air lines at the fuel control unit. The airplane had flown approximately 5 hours since the conditional inspection. Numerous attempts to obtain the completed Pilot/Operator Aircraft Accident Report (NTSB Form 6120.1/2) were unsuccessful. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2002_FTW03LA006.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.