FTW03LA165
2003-06-02 · Gainesville, Texas, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport KGLE
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's failure to maintain directional control while landing. Contributing factors were the prevailing crosswind and the pilot's failure to abort landing.
Factual narrative
On June 2, 2003, approximately 1310 central daylight time, a Cessna 172P single-engine airplane, N51611, was substantially damaged following a loss of directional control while attempting an aborted landing at the Gainesville Municipal Airport (GLE), near Gainesville, Texas. The student pilot, who was the sole occupant, sustained minor injuries. The airplane was registered to and operated by Delta Qualiflight of Fort Worth, Texas. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and a flight plan was not filed for the 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 instructional flight. The round robin flight originated at the Fort Worth Meacham Airport (FTW), near Fort Worth, Texas, at 1145, with an intermediate stop at GLE, and back to FTW. The 33-hour student pilot reported that as he landed on Runway 17, a gust of wind blew the aircraft to the far left of the runway. The student pilot applied right rudder, right aileron, full power, carburetor heat in, and removed 10 degrees of flaps. The pilot stated, "The sudden wind gust kept blowing the plane further left into the grass. The speed was not building, I increased right rudder and aileron trying to get the aircraft airborne and under control." The pilot then added full power to go-around. The airplane departed the 100-foot wide runway to the left, and impacted the windsock. The student pilot added that the airplane "would not lift off after adding power." Examination of the wreckage by the operator, revealed that the left wing separated, and the fuselage separated aft of the cabin bulkhead. At 1306, the GLE Automated Weather Observation System (AWOS) reported the winds from 260 degrees at 10 knots, 10 statute miles visibility, sky clear, temperature 30 degrees Celsius, dewpoint 19 degrees Celsius, and an altimeter setting of 29.79 inches of Mercury. The density altitude was calculated by the Investigator-In-Charge at 2,937 feet. The 33-hour student pilot was not able to maintain directional control while landing with a right crosswind. The student pilot reported that as he landed, a wind gust blew the aircraft to the far left of the runway. The student pilot applied right rudder, right aileron, full power, carburetor heat in, and removed 10 degrees of flaps. The pilot then added full power to go-around. The airplane departed the 100-foot wide runway to the left, and impacted the windsock. At 1306, the GLE Automated Weather Observation System (AWOS) reported the winds from 260 degrees at 10 knots. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2003_FTW03LA165.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (go-around). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2025 · Conference Paper A Training Study to Improve Monitoring During A Go-Around
As part of an FAA program to improve go-around (GA) safety, we were asked to determine if we could improve the performance of the Pilot Monitoring (PM) during a GA maneuver.
- Flight Safety Foundation 2024 · FSF / AeroSafety World Go-Around Safety Forum Findings
Foundation Go-Around Safety Forum technical findings — examines why pilots fail to execute go-arounds when criteria are met (stabilized approach gate not met, energy state out of envelope, traffic con…
- Semantic Scholar 2022 · Article (Journal of Safety Research) Go-around accidents and general aviation safety.
INTRODUCTION Changes in General Aviation (GA) accident rates, specifically in the go-around phase, are examined by comparing the number of accidents, the proportion of fatal accidents, and the proport…
- Semantic Scholar 2021 · Article (Aerospace) Classification and Analysis of Go-Arounds in Commercial Aviation Using ADS-B Data
Go-arounds are a necessary aspect of commercial aviation and are conducted after a landing attempt has been aborted. It is necessary to conduct go-arounds in the safest possible manner, as go-arounds …
- NASA NTRS 2021 · Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes) Go-Around Criteria Refinement for Transport Category Aircraft
Presently, airline pilots are trained to go around if, when lower than 500 ft above the ground, they are outside of a handful of parameters such as airspeed, position, and rate of descent.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Validation of Proposed Go-Around Criteria Under Various Environmental Conditions
This paper evaluates the effects of environmental conditions on touchdown performance under varying approach states and validates proposed go-around criteria developed using data from a previously con…