FTW93FA185
1993-06-09 · GREENVILLE, Texas, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport GVT
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
THE PILOT-IN-COMMAND'S FAILURE TO FOLLOW THE PUBLISHED EMERGENCY PROCEDURES. FACTORS WERE ENGINE FIRE WARNING SYSTEM ACTIVATING FOR UNDETERMINED REASONS, AND THE RESULTANT AC POWER LOSS WHEN THAT ENGINE WAS SECURED. THE LACK OF RECENT EXPEREINCE IN TYPE AIRCRAFT AND THE LOSS OF CONTROL DURING THE LANDING ROLL.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHT: On June 9, 1993, at 1646 central daylight time, a Convair 580, N580HH, was substantially damaged during a precautionary landing on runway 17 at Majors Airport, Greenville, Texas. Neither the airline transport rated pilot, the commercial rated copilot, nor the thirteen passengers were injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The intent of the flight was to flight test onboard electronic equipment. According to the crew and test personnel onboard the airplane, several electrical spikes occurred while in flight to the alternating current (AC) system. The captain stated that the left engine's fire warning light illuminated several times along with other fluctuating instruments. He secured the left engine and used the fire extinguishing system which resulted in the warning light going out and a loss of AC power to the airplane. A successful single engine landing was accomplished. During the landing roll, aircraft control was lost. Interviews with the crew revealed that the crew did not activate the emergency direct current (DC) hydraulic power switch to provide nose wheel steering capabilities, normally an AC powered system. PERSONNEL INFORMATION: According to interviews conducted by the investigator in charge of the pilot, copilot, and other company personnel, the following information was obtained. The pilot in command and the copilot had both logged very little time recently in this airplane. As corporate pilots they both had primary flight duties in either the company owned Douglas DC3 or a Learjet. This airplane was flown only for test and evaluation of the onboard electronic equipment installed in the passenger compartment. FLIGHT RECORDERS: A Sundstrand model CVR-80 cockpit voice recorder was sent to the National Transportation Safety Board laboratory for analysis. The tape contained no pertinent information and no transcript was produced. WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATION: All of the following distances were measured by the investigator in charge and are approximate. The aircraft landed 2,000 feet from the landing threshold. Physical evidence, ground scars, indicated that the aircraft ran off the west side of the runway 5,500 feet from the threshold and crossed a drainage ditch to a parallel taxiway and came to a stop 300 feet from the northern most end of the taxiway on a heading of 172 degrees. When the aircraft exited the drainage ditch to the parallel taxiway the nose gear assembly broke at the mounting yoke, the right propeller assembly contacted the ground and separated from the aircraft at the gear reduction assembly, and the fuselage underside, aft of the aft cargo door area, contacted the ground. TESTS AND RESEARCH: The electrical systems (AC and DC) were evaluated for continuity and functional operation, no discrepancies were found. The left engine was examined and no anomalies were found. ADDITIONAL DATA: The airplane was released to the operator for repair or disposition. THE CREW AND PASSENGERS WERE TESTING ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT WHEN THE PILOTS RECIEVED A LEFT FIRE WARNING LIGHT AND BELL. THE PILOT SECURED THE LEFT ENGINE AND LANDED UNDER SINGLE ENGINE CONDITIONS. DURING THE LANDING THE PILOT LOST CONTROL OF THE AIRCRAFT DUE TO A LACK OF NOSE WHEEL STEERING. THE STEERING WAS LOST BECAUSE THE LEFT ENGINE WAS SHUT DOWN. THIS ENGINE ALSO DEVELOPS THE REQUIRED AC POWER. UNDER EMERGENCY CONDITIONS THE NOSE STEERING IS OPERATED UNDER DC POWER AND THIS IS ACTIVATED BY THE CREW. THE CREW DID NOT ACTIVATE THE DC POWER SWITCH. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1993_FTW93FA185.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, loss of control). All research papers
- Semantic Scholar 2016 · Article (Interacción) Trajectory Recovery System: Angle of Attack Guidance for Inflight Loss of Control
This paper describes the design and development of an ecological display to aid pilots in the recovery of an In-Flight Loss of Control event due to a Stall (ILOC-S).
- NTSB Aircraft Accident Reports 2010 · Accident report Loss of Control on Approach — Colgan Air Flight 3407
Colgan Air 3407 / Continental Connection (Q400) Buffalo NY, February 12, 2009 — 50 fatalities. Definitive investigation of the Colgan 3407 stall-stick-pusher crash on approach to Buffalo.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2025 · Journal article (JAAER) A Scoping Review of Aviation Loss of Control Inflight Research
Loss of control – inflight (LOC-I) contributes to aircraft accidents at unacceptably high rates. Significant industry efforts and research have aimed to improve LOC-I prevention, detection, and recove…
- SKYbrary (Eurocontrol) 2024 · SKYbrary article Loss of Control In-Flight (LOC-I) — SKYbrary Knowledge Base
SKYbrary comprehensive knowledge-base entry on Loss of Control In-Flight — definitions, contributing factors, accident case studies (Air France 447, Colgan 3407), and prevention strategies.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (International Conference on Networking and Services) Risk Assessment of Loss of Control In-Flight Trajectories for Urban Air Mobility Safety
In Urban Air Mobility (UAM), maintaining a minimum separation between aircraft is a safety requirement, which becomes challenging amidst congested air traffic and off-nominal conditions, such as Loss …