FTW94FA282
1994-08-28 · HARLINGEN, Texas, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport HRL
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
THE PILOT'S FAILURE TO MAINTAIN AIRSPEED RESULTING IN AN INADVERTENT STALL. FACTORS WERE A PARTIAL LOSS OF POWER ON ALL ENGINES DUE TO WORN AND FOULED SPARK PLUGS AND INADEQUATE MAINTENANCE BY COMPANY MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL, AIRCRAFT WEIGHT BEYOND LIMITATIONS, AND HIGH DENSITY ALTITUDE.
Factual narrative
HISTORY OF FLIGHT: On August 28, 1994, at 1410 central daylight time, a Cessna 402, N966JW, was substantially damaged during a forced landing near Harlingen, Texas. The commercial pilot and six passengers received minor injuries. The Title 14 CFR Part 135 on demand operator was Airways Adventures of Harlingen, Texas. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the non-scheduled passenger flight to Matamoros, Mexico. During a telephone interview the pilot reported the following information. He added full power for the takeoff from runway 17L and the gear was retracted following liftoff. Seconds after retracting the gear the "vertical velocity and forward velocity were decreasing" as a partial loss of power occurred. From 150 feet to 200 feet MSL, a forced landing with gear up was made to a plowed field beyond the departure end of the runway. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspectors reported the information in this paragraph. The airplane went through customs at Brownsville, Texas, that morning and then landed at San Benito, Texas, where the airplane was refueled. Throughout several attempts by the pilot and the operator, the left engine would not start. A mechanic who was contacted to start the engine removed the engine magneto "P" leads and started the left engine. The mechanic told the operator and the pilot that there was no way to check the operation of the magnetos with the "P" leads removed. The airplane was flown to Harlingen, Texas, to load the passengers destined for Matamoros, Mexico. At Harlingen, Texas, the right engine would not start and the mechanic removed the "P" leads from the right engine. Passengers reported the information contained in this paragraph. Six written statements are enclosed. The arrival of the airplane was delayed due to mechanical problems and at Harlingen a mechanic was called to assist in getting the right engine started. One passenger reported the baggage was "crammed into the luggage compartments." Subsequently, the pilot taxied the airplane to the end of the runway and was cleared for takeoff. Neither run-up checks nor passengers briefings were done. The pilot continued the takeoff roll; however, the airplane was not accelerating. The airplane finally lifted off the runway and gained altitude as the gear was retracted. Three of the passengers reported the stall warning right after takeoff. After the accident, the pilot left the scene, and Gulf Aviation personnel immediately unloaded the luggage. Passengers were assisted by the airport fire and rescue personnel. AIRCRAFT INFORMATION: Maintenance records indicated that engine S/N 237010R was installed in the left hand position of N966JW on May 9, 1994, with a TSMOH as 828.8 hours and the turbocharger was changed on June 21, 1994. The installation date of engine S/N 183244R in the right hand position could not be determined by the available records. Weight and balance data (enclosed copy) calibrated in May, 1993, indicates a maximum allowable gross weight (enclosed) for takeoff as 6,300 pounds which includes a basic empty weight of 4,087 pounds and a useful load of 2,213 pounds. The flight load manifest (enclosed copy) signed by the pilot indicates a total aircraft weight of 6,281 pounds for this flight. On the enclosed reports, the owner, operator, and pilot stated 120 gallons of fuel on board at takeoff. Thus at 6 pounds per gallon, the total fuel weight was 720 pounds. Passenger statements (enclosed) indicated a total passenger/baggage weight of 1,663 pounds. FAA medical records state the pilot's weight as 177 pounds. Summation of the basic empty weight, oil (49 pounds), pilot, passenger/baggage weight and fuel weight gives a total takeoff weight of 6,696 pounds. This is 396 pounds over the maximum allowable gross takeoff weight. With a takeoff temperature of 95 degrees Fahrenheit, the density altitude was 2,600 feet. WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATION: FAA inspectors examined the airplane and reported that the fuselage and right wing sustained substantial damage. Flight control continuity was established and fuel was found in the tanks. They confirmed that the "P" leads for all magnetos had been removed. TEST AND RESEARCH: The airplane was examined on September 20, 1994, at Air Salvage of Dallas, Lancaster, Texas. Continuity was confirmed for each engine. Differential compression checks on the engines found 4 cylinders below 60 PSI for the left engine and 5 cylinders below 60 PSI for the right engine. Points on all the magnetos were burned and the left magneto on each engine would not fire. All spark plugs exhibited wear and deposits in the electrode areas. Bottom plugs from the left engine cylinders #3 and #5 would not fire and the bottom plugs from the right engine cylinders #1, #3, #4, #5, and #6 would not fire. On the left engine, the fuel unit throttle body was not clamped at the turbocharger. See the enclosed engine report for additional details. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The airplane was released to the owner's representative. FOLLOWING UNSUCCESSFUL ATTEMPTS TO START THE ENGINES, A MECHANIC REMOVED THE 'P' LEADS ON ALL MAGNETOS MAKING IT IMPOSSIBLE TO COMPLETE THE RUN-UP CHECKS. SECONDS AFTER GEAR RETRACTION THE AIRPLANE VELOCITY DECREASED AND FROM ABOUT 200 FEET MSL, A FORCED LANDING WAS MADE TO A PLOWED FIELD. PASSENGERS REPORTED HEARING THE STALL WARNING. ENGINE CONTINUITY WAS CONFIRMED. DIFFERENTIAL COMPRESSION CHECKS FOUND 4 CYLINDERS BELOW 60 PSI FOR THE LEFT AND 5 CYLINDERS BELOW 60 PSI FOR THE RIGHT. POINTS ON ALL MAGNETOS WERE BURNED AND THE LEFT MAGNETO ON EACH ENGINE WOULD NOT FIRE. ALL SPARK PLUGS EXHIBITED WEAR AND DEPOSITS IN THE ELECTRODES. BOTTOM PLUGS FROM THE LEFT ENGINE CYLINDERS #3 AND #5 WOULD NOT FIRE AND THE BOTTOM PLUGS FROM THE RIGHT ENGINE CYLINDERS #1, #3, #4, #5, AND #6 WOULD NOT FIRE. TOP PLUGS FROM THE RIGHT ENGINE CYLINDERS #5 AND #6 WOULD NOT FIRE. THE LEFT ENGINE FUEL CONTROL UNIT THROTTLE BODY WAS NOT CLAMPED AT THE TURBOCHARGER. THERE WERE 6 MALE PASSENGERS, THEIR BAGGAGE, AND 120 GALLONS OF FUEL ABOARD. DENSITY ALTITUDE WAS CALCULATED AT 2,600 FEET. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1994_FTW94FA282.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.