NTSB CAROL · Event
Event FTW97LA200
Registry · N7890R
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
BEECH 56TC
Year of manufacture
1969 · 28 years old at event
Engine
LYCOMING TI0-541 SER (310 hp)
Seats / Engines
6 seats · 2 engines
Last airworthiness date
19690311
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S AAB45D
Registrant of record
DANISH TIMOTHY F
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's failure to perform an adequate preflight (did not remove pitot tube protective covering prior to flight) which resulted in an inaccurate cockpit airspeed indication during takeoff roll and subsequent emergency landing. Factors were, the pilot's diverted attention while performing his preflight (loose animal on the ramp), the pilot's failure to abort the takeoff after noticing an airspeed anomaly during takeoff roll, and the low ceiling (100 feet overcast) the pilot encountered after lift off and while returning to land.
Factual narrative
On May 23, 1997, at 0858 central daylight time, a Beech BE-56TC airplane, N7890R, owned and operated by Aerostar L.L.P., of Spring, Texas, and operated by the pilot, was substantially damaged while executing a precautionary landing at David Wayne Hooks Memorial Airport, near Spring, Texas. The instrument rated commercial pilot, sole occupant, was not injured. Instrument meteorological conditions prevailed and an IFR flight plan was filed for the Title 14 CFR Part 91 personal cross country flight. The flight originated from the aforementioned airport 2 minutes prior to the accident. After departing runway 35L, the pilot informed the tower that he was going to return to land. While landing, the left wing of the airplane contacted the runway. The pilot regained control of the airplane after the wing struck the runway surface, bringing the aircraft to a full stop on the runway. The outboard 3 feet of the left wing sustained structural damage and the trailing edge of the left aileron and left propeller blades were damaged. In a interview with a FAA inspector, the pilot reported that on the previous evening he went to the airport to perform a preflight and have the airplane fueled for the trip departing early the next morning. He stated that prior to leaving the airport that evening, he performed a preflight in accordance with the checklist provided by the aircraft manufacturer. He further stated the aircraft was left in a hangar overnight with the pitot tube cover installed on the pitot tube. The pilot stated that, on the morning of the accident, he removed the airplane from the hangar, performed another preflight, obtained a weather briefing, and filed a flight plan. He reported that the preflight he performed that morning was not as thorough as the preflight he performed on the previous evening. The pilot further reported that, during the preflight a loose dog distracted him. He stated that he interrupted the preflight to close the hangar door to prevent the dog from entering the hangar, and then completed the preflight. After completing preflight preparations the pilot started the engines, taxied to runway 35L, was cleared for takeoff, and began his takeoff roll. During the takeoff roll, he checked the engine instruments and they appeared normal. The pilot stated that, during the takeoff roll, he interpreted the airspeed indicator to read about "sixty". He continued down the runway, and lifted off with the airspeed indicator still indicating about "sixty". After lift off, the pilot knew something was wrong and told the tower he was going to make a right turn to downwind and return for landing. He left the landing gear in the extended position for the return to the airport. The pilot stated that, with the takeoff power setting that he had applied, he perceived his speed to be 130 knots. He further reported that his turns in the traffic pattern were made using 45 degrees angle of bank to avoid a stall, and he kept the runway in sight at all times. He did not notice the damage to the wing until after taxiing back to the hanger. He further stated that it was not until after exiting the airplane, he saw the damaged propeller and wing, and that the pitot tube cover was still installed on the pitot tube. The cloud cover at the time of the accident was measured at 100 overcast. The reported visibility was 1 mile and "BR"(mist). According to the manufacturer's published FAA approved Pilot's Operating Handbook, the following airspeeds for lift off are recommended for safe operation: A/C WEIGHT AIRSPEED 5,990 lbs. 92 Knots 5,500 lbs. 89 Knots 5,000 lbs. 87 Knots 4,500 lbs 85 Knots The actual takeoff weight of N7890R was not reported to this agency. However, according to manufacturer's records for this aircraft (serial number TG-76), the airplane's basic empty weight when manufactured in 1969 was 3,926 pounds. The total fuel capacity for this model is 207 gallons, or approximately 1,212 pounds. Using this information, the takeoff weight at the time of the accident would have been about 5,100 pounds, plus or minus pilot and baggage weight. Immediately after takeoff, the pilot informed the control tower that he was going to return to land. While landing, the left wing of the airplane struck the runway. He stated that a loose dog distracted him during the preflight as he had to close a hangar door to prevent the dog from entering. During takeoff roll, the engine instruments appeared normal, except for the airspeed indicator, which indicated 'sixty' knots. He continued down the 7,000 foot runway, and lifted off with the airspeed indicator still indicating about 'sixty'. After lift off, the pilot knew something was wrong and told the tower he was going to make a right turn to downwind and return for landing. After landing, the pilot noticed that the left wing and left propeller were damaged and that the pitot tube cover was still installed on the pitot tube. The estimated takeoff weight of the aircraft was about 5,100 pounds. The manufacturer's published airspeed for lift off at 5,500 pounds gross weight is 89 knots. The measured cloud cover (ceiling) at the time of the accident was 100 feet overcast with 1 mile visibility Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1997_FTW97LA200.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing, stall). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint
Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Contractor Report (CR)
An Evaluation of an Analytical Simulation of an Airplane with Tailplane Icing by Comparison to Flight Data
This report presents the assessment of an analytical tool developed as part of the NASA/FAA Tailplane Icing Program. The analytical tool is a specialized simulation program called TAILSM4 which was de…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Technical Publication (TP)
NASA/FAA Tailplane Icing Program: Flight Test Report
This report presents results from research flights that explored the characteristics of an ice-contaminated tailplane using various simulated ice shapes attached to the leading edge of the horizontal …
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Other
[Tail Plane Icing]
The Aviation Safety Program initiated by NASA in 1997 has put greater emphasis in safety related research activities. Ice-contaminated-tailplane stall (ICTS) has been identified by the NASA Lewis Icin…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2019 · Journal article (IJAAA)
Airport Policing in Pakistan: Structure, Training, and Issue
Airports are strategically and economically important installations of any country. Airports are the gateway of any country and any incidents at these gateways may harm the very aspects of a country i…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗