FTW99LA025
1998-07-27 · VERNON, Texas, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport F05
Current FAA registration · N9744M
- Make / Model
- MOONEY M20C
- Engine
- LYCOMING O&VO-360 SER (180 hp)
- Seats / Engines
- 4 seats · 1 engine
- Last airworthiness date
- 19670204
- ADS-B equipped
- Yes — Mode-S AD9571
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
Fatigue cracking of the propeller blade which originated from corrosion pitting on its camber side, resulting in the blade tip separation during cruise flight.
Factual narrative
On July 27, 1998, approximately 0950 central daylight time, a Mooney M20C airplane, N9744M, sustained substantial damage following a partial propeller blade separation during cruise flight near the Wilbarger County Airport near Vernon, Texas. The commercial pilot, sole occupant of the airplane, was not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and a flight plan was not filed for the Title 14 CFR Part 91 personal flight. The flight originated from the Front Range Airport near Denver, Colorado, at 0415 and was destined for Denton, Texas. The aircraft was owned by a private individual and leased to Flight Training Center, Inc., of Watkins, Colorado. In the enclosed NTSB Form 6120.1/2 Pilot/Operator Aircraft Accident Report, the pilot stated that approximately four hours into the flight the "aircraft began to shake violently." The pilot added that he immediately "pulled the mixture and began a steep climb to stop the engine." The pilot then extended the landing gear and executed an emergency landing at the Wilbarger County Airport. Examination of the airplane by an aircraft mechanic revealed that the airframe's engine support structure sustained structural damage. Additionally the starter, exhaust, and alternator were found loose. Examination of the propeller revealed that one blade tip was missing outboard from approximately the 30 inch station. The morning of the flight, the pilot performed a preflight inspection of the airplane, which included the propeller. During the dark hours of the morning, the pilot taxied to the runway via a taxiway covered with asphalt debris and gravel left by construction at the airport. The owners of the accident airplane stated that they mentioned the potential of foreign object damage (FOD) hazard to the airport manager the day before the flight. When the owners of the airplane received word of the propeller separation, they photographed the debris on the taxiway. The blade was cut approximately seven inches inboard of the fracture to facilitate shipment to the NTSB Materials Laboratory in Washington, D.C. A detailed examination of the fractured surface with the aid of a bench binocular microscope showed crack arrest positions, which are characteristics of fatigue cracking. Examination of the fatigue crack with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) revealed that corrosion pitting on the camber side of the blade was the origin of the fatigue crack. There was no indication on the section of propeller blade sent to the NTSB Materials Laboratory that the origin of the blade fatigue failure initiated from FOD. See the enclosed NTSB Materials Laboratory Factual Report for further details of the examination. Maintenance records revealed that the last propeller overhaul was completed on November 16, 1989. The recommended time between overhaul for the propeller assembly is 5 years or 2,000 hours, whichever comes first. The estimated total time of the propeller at the time of overhaul was 15,590 hours. The last annual inspection was completed on January 1, 1998. The NTSB and the FAA were not notified of this occurrence until November 13, 1998. The propeller blade separated during cruise flight and the aircraft started 'shaking violently.' The pilot pulled the mixture control to idle-cut-off and put the aircraft into a steep climb to stop the propeller. The pilot then diverted to an airport where he landed safely. The remainder of the blade was sent to the NTSB Materials Laboratory in Washington, D.C. A detailed examination of the fractured surface revealed crack arrest positions characteristic of fatigue cracking. Examination of the fatigue crack with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) revealed that corrosion pitting on the camber side of the blade was the origin of the fatigue crack. The propeller was last overhauled on November 16, 1989, and the last annual inspection was completed on January 1, 1998. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1998_FTW99LA025.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) A New Trajectory in UAV Safety: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning for Distance Maintenance Under Wind Variations
In the field of aviation, safety is a critical cornerstone, and the operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems is deeply connected with this principle.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2024 · Journal article (JAAER) Low-Resource Automatic Speech Recognition Domain Adaptation – A Case-Study in Aviation Maintenance
With timeliness and efficiency being critical in the aviation maintenance industry, the need has been growing for smart technological solutions that optimize and streamline the different underlying ta…