FTW99LA113
1999-04-09 · FRANKLINTON, Louisiana, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport 2R7
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
Loss of engine power for an undetermined reason. A factor was the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
Factual narrative
On April 9, 1999, at 0900 central daylight time, a Grumman-Schweizer G-164B agricultural airplane, N6673Q, was destroyed following impact with trees and terrain during the takeoff/initial climb near Franklinton, Louisiana. The airplane was registered to and operated by Paynes Flying Service, Inc., of Brandon, Mississippi, under Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 137. The commercial pilot, sole occupant of the airplane, was not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the local aerial application flight for which a flight plan was not filed. The flight was originating from runway 17 at the Franklinton Municipal Airport at the time of the accident. The operator and the pilot reported that the airplane was loaded with 3,500 pounds of fertilizer and the fuel tanks topped for the first flight of the day. Low clouds at 2,000 feet had started to break up, the winds were light and variable, with a temperature of approximately 73 degrees Fahrenheit. The pilot taxied the airplane for departure to the south. The pilot stated that "the aircraft lifted off about 2/3 of the way down the runway [3,000 feet long], and did not accelerate." The pilot further stated that the "engine sound did not change." The pilot started dumping the load of fertilizer, leveled the airplane, and turned into the wind for the forced landing. He stated that the airplane "did not have enough airspeed to stay up [and] then went down into the trees" 1/4 mile south of the airport. The FAA inspector and the operator examined the aircraft and found structural damage throughout the airframe. The fuel control unit and the fuel pump were removed from the Garrett TPE-331-6-252M turbine engine and forwarded to the respective manufacturers for examination under the surveillance of a FAA inspector. Functional testing of the fuel pump showed the low rpm, low-pressure flow was zero. The pump ran on the test bench "without any unusual noises or fluctuations." According to the manufacturer, "the fuel pump was capable of putting out sufficient pressure and flow at normal operating rpm to properly provide fuel to the fuel control unit to operate" the engine. The manufacturer further stated that the no flow at low rpm "was probably due to the broken carbon bearing which is typical of a prop[eller] strike." See the enclosed report for additional details. The FAA inspector concurred that the "pump had no fuel discharge at the minimum RPM." Damaged precluded a functional test of the fuel control unit; therefore, the unit was disassembled. Examination of the fuel control diaphragm revealed two holes. According to the manufacturer, the teardown examination revealed "that the damage to the fuel control is the result of impact damage. See the enclosed report for additional details. The FAA coordinator stated that "a tear in the diaphragm could cause a loss of power." A review of the maintenance records revealed that the last annual inspection was performed on October 20, 1998. The engine was removed in June 1998 due to metal in the chip detector and oil filter. Following an oil and filter change, the engine was run in a test cell and then reinstalled on the airframe. The firewall fuel filters and fuel pump inlet filter were replaced on April 3, 1999. The overhauled flow divider, installed in February 1999, was also replaced on April 3, 1999. An oil sample was taken for analysis; however, data of the analysis was never made available to the NTSB investigator-in-charge. In March 1999, the fuel control was replaced with unit serial number 1294294 with 3,719.9 hours. During the takeoff/initial climb, 'the aircraft lifted off about 2/3 of the way down the runway and did not accelerate.' The 'engine sound did not change.' The pilot reported the airplane 'went down into the trees' 1/4 mile from the airport. Functional testing of the fuel pump showed the fuel pump was capable of putting out sufficient pressure and flow at normal operating rpm to properly provide fuel to the fuel control unit to operate the engine. Damage precluded a functional test of the fuel control unit. Disassembly of the unit revealed 2 holes in the fuel control diaphragm. The manufacturer stated 'the damage to the fuel control is the result of impact damage.' The FAA coordinator stated that 'a tear in the diaphragm could cause a loss of power.' The reason for the loss of engine power could not be determined. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1999_FTW99LA113.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.