IAD03LA029
2003-01-18 · CHESAPEAKE, Virginia, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport PVG
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's failure to adequately remove snow and ice from the airplane's wings prior to takeoff.
Factual narrative
On January 18, 2003, at 1440 eastern standard time, a Cessna 172, N6312E, was substantially damaged during a forced landing to a field in Chesapeake, Virginia. The airplane had just departed Hampton Roads Executive Airport (PVG), Portsmouth, Virginia. The certificated commercial pilot and the passenger were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed for the local personal flight, conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. In a written statement, the pilot wrote that she had spent 1 1/2 hours prior to the flight brushing snow from the airplane's wings. She used a small ladder to move around the wing span, and reported that she cleared the leading edges, but had left the remainder of snow pushed back on the wings so it would fall off during taxi. The pilot stated that when the airplane reached an altitude of 300 feet, the airplane's stall horn activated. She lowered the nose of the airplane to prevent a stall, but the stall horn continued to sound. The pilot executed a 180-degree turn back toward the runway, but was unable to reach it, and landed hard in a field adjacent to the airport. A witness, a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Designated Pilot Examiner, was sitting inside the airport restaurant with other pilots, when she saw the airplane taxiing through the ramp area. Both of the airplane's wings were nearly covered with 4-inch tall chunks of snow and ice. The witness said that she and the other pilots had commented about the wing contamination, and hoped the airplane was not taxiing to take-off. A few minutes later, the witness observed the airplane on the take-off roll. Snow was flying off the wings as the airplane picked up speed, but it did not lift off the runway until it was several hundred feet past the intersection of runway 02. The witness reported that the airplane reached about 20 feet when it started sinking; then began to climb again. She felt the airplane was struggling to gain altitude. The airplane climbed approximately 200 hundred more feet as it passed the end of the runway, before it turned left and descended below the tree line. The witness said that she immediately responded to the accident site. Upon her arrival, she asked the pilot if she knew that the airplane's wings were covered with snow before she had departed. The pilot responded that she had spent about 30 minutes prior to the flight attempting to remove it, and just did something "stupid". The witness also reported that there was at least a 1/4-inch layer of ice and snow on the wings when she arrived. Two FAA inspectors examined the airplane on January 21, 2003. According to one of them, the nose wheel had separated from the airplane and the firewall was torn. Both wing tips also sustained damage, and the fuselage was wrinkled. Runway 28 was a 4,000-foot-long by 70-foot-wide paved runway. The pilot held a commercial pilot certificate with ratings for airplane single-engine land, multi-engine land, and instrument airplane. She was also a certified flight instructor with ratings for airplane single-engine land, multi-engine land, and instrument airplane. The pilot reported a total of 1,226 hours, of which, 800 were in make and model. In a written statement, the pilot reported that she, "...failed to adequately remove some snow from the top of the wings." After the accident, the pilot voluntarily sought and received training regarding frost, icing, and snow and its effects on aircraft performance. Weather at the airport at the time of the accident was reported as calm wind and clear skies. The pilot spent 1 1/2 hours prior to the flight brushing snow from the leading edges of the airplane's wings, but had left the remainder of snow pushed back on the wings. On takeoff, when the airplane reached an altitude of 300 feet agl, the airplane's stall horn activated. The pilot lowered the nose of the airplane to prevent a stall, but the stall horn continued to sound. She then executed a 180-degree turn back toward the runway, but was unable to reach it, and landed hard in a field adjacent to the airport. A witness, a Federal Aviation Administration Designated Pilot Examiner, saw the airplane taxiing through the ramp area and recalled that both of the airplane's wings were nearly covered with 4-inch tall chunks of snow and ice. The witness also reported that there was at least a 1/4-inch layer of ice and snow on the wings when she arrived to the scene of the accident. In a written statement, the pilot reported that she, "...failed to adequately remove some snow from the top of the wings." After the accident, the pilot voluntarily sought and received training regarding frost, icing, and snow and its effects on aircraft performance. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2003_IAD03LA029.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing, stall). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2023 · Reprint (Version printed in journal) Finite Element Simulation of Three Full-Scale Crash Tests for Cessna 172 Aircraft
The NASA Emergency Locator Transmitter Survivability and Reliability project was initiated in 2013 to assess the crash performance standards for the next generation of emergency locator transmitter (E…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Crash Testing and Simulation of a Cessna 172 Aircraft: Pitch Down Impact Onto Soft Soil
During the summer of 2015, NASA Langley Research Center conducted three full-scale crash tests of Cessna 172 (C-172) aircraft at the NASA Langley Landing and Impact Research (LandIR) Facility.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Technical Memorandum (TM) Simulating the Impact Response of Three Full-Scale Crash Tests of Cessna 172 Aircraft
During the summer of 2015, a series of three full-scale crash tests were performed at the Landing and Impact Research Facility located at NASA Langley Research Center of Cessna 172 aircraft.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Contractor Report (CR) An Evaluation of an Analytical Simulation of an Airplane with Tailplane Icing by Comparison to Flight Data
This report presents the assessment of an analytical tool developed as part of the NASA/FAA Tailplane Icing Program. The analytical tool is a specialized simulation program called TAILSM4 which was de…