IAD05LA033
2005-01-17 · Cincinnati, Ohio, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport LUK
N3085Q has since been reassigned. It is now registered to a different aircraft (AIR TRACTOR INC AT-802A, built 2015), which was not involved in this event.
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
A total loss of engine power due to an oil hose collapse, which resulted in failure of the #4 connecting rod.
Factual narrative
On January 17, 2005, about 1254 eastern standard time, an amateur built Ghiles MCR-01 VLA, N3085Q, was substantially damaged during a forced landing following a total loss of engine power while in cruise flight, near Cincinnati, Ohio. The certificated private pilot and passenger were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan had been filed for the flight that departed the Cincinnati Municipal Airport-Lunken Field (LUK), Cincinnati, Ohio; destined for the Butler County Regional Airport (HAO), Hamilton, Ohio. The personal flight was conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. According to the pilot, the airplane was in cruise flight when he smelled a "hot" smell. Approximately 10 seconds later, the engine lost all power. The pilot was not able to restart the engine, and performed a forced landing to a roadway. During the landing, the airplane's left wing struck a utility pole and separated from the fuselage. According to a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector, an examination of the airplane revealed that it was equipped with an un-certificated Rotax 912 ULS engine. Further examination discovered that fuel was present in the fuel system, and the engine contained oil. No leaks could be located in either the firewall mounted oil tank, or the plumbing for the lubrication system; however, when the inspector attempted to rotate the propeller by hand, the crankshaft would not rotate. On April 7, 2004, at the facilities of Lockwood Aviation Inc. Sanford, Florida, the engine removed from the airplane was examined under the supervision of an FAA inspector. During the examination it was revealed that both carburetor choke systems were seized, and both the left and right carburetor throats showed evidence of oil residue and hardened deposits. The engine components, including the sprag clutch were dry, and almost devoid of lubrication. The lower rod bearings had failed, along with the #2 and #4 rod. The #4 rod was separated from the crankshaft, and the #4 piston was jammed into the cylinder head. The oil pump was undamaged, and did not indicate any type of failure mode. However, after the fire sleeve covering the oil feed line was cut-away, it was discovered that the hose was kinked and exhibited distance collapse of its shape. A review of the airplane's maintenance records showed that the last maintenance action had occurred on December 26, 2004, and had involved the replacement of a throttle cable, and re-synchronizing of the carburetors. The last work performed on the lubrication system occurred on April 27, 2004, and involved an oil and filter change as well as a re-installation of the oil sending unit. Review of the operator manual for the un-certificated Rotax aircraft engine revealed, "Warning: Never fly the aircraft equipped with this engine at locations, airspeeds, altitudes, or other circumstances from which a successful no-power landing cannot be made after sudden engine stoppage." The manual further stated, "You should be aware that any engine may seize or stall at any time. This could lead to a crash landing and possible severe injury or death." During the cruise portion of the flight, the airplane experienced a total loss of engine power. The pilot was unable to restart the engine, and performed a forced landing to a roadway. During the landing, the left wing struck a utility pole. A post accident examination of the un-certificated engine revealed that it contained oil, and no leaks could be located in the lubrication system. The crankshaft could not be rotated by hand via the propeller. Further examination revealed that the #4 rod had separated from the crankshaft, and the #4 piston was jammed into the cylinder head. The oil pump was undamaged and did not indicate any type of failure mode. However, an oil hose was found to be kinked and exhibiting distance collapse of its shape. The engine manufacturer's operating manual stated in part, "Warning: Never fly the aircraft equipped with this engine at locations, airspeeds, altitudes, or other circumstances from which a successful no-power landing cannot be made after sudden engine stoppage." The manual further stated, "You should be aware that any engine may seize or stall at any time. This could lead to a crash landing and possible severe injury or death." Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2005_IAD05LA033.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, maintenance). All research papers
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2023 · Conference paper The Value of Strong Partnerships to Build a Successful Aviation Maintenance Career Pathway Program for Transitioning Military Service Members
The aerospace industry is competing with other industries for a qualified workforce, and many of those competing industries are investing heavily in creating workforce development pipelines.
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2026 · Journal article (IJAAA) From Reactive to Predictive: A hybrid Trust-Mediated Adoption Framework for Data-Driven Maintenance in Distributed-Authority Aviation Environments
Modern aviation maintenance operates within increasingly data-intensive technological environments, yet the operational integration of predictive maintenance into routine decision-making remains incon…
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- Semantic Scholar 2026 · Article (Reliability Engineering & System Safety) Understanding human error in military aviation maintenance: The role of Performance shaping factors, cognitive workload and error orientation
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Applied Sciences) Decision-Making Framework for Aviation Safety in Predictive Maintenance Strategies
The implementation of predictive maintenance (PM) in aviation presents unique challenges due to strict safety requirements, complex operational environments, and regulatory constraints.
- Semantic Scholar 2024 · Article (Defence Science Journal) Modelling of Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Using HFACS ME Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Maintenance Extension and Bayesian Network
Aircraft maintenance is a complex task involving a skilled human workforce, spare parts, and various other resources. Human factors are an inherent element of the human workforce.