IAD96LA053
1996-03-22 · ROANOKE, Virginia, United States · None · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport ROA
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
loss of engine power for undetermined reason(s). Darkness and the pilot's improper emergency procedures were related factors.
Factual narrative
On March 21, 1996, at 1908 eastern standard time, a Cessna 172, N108RV, struck a parked car and a tree during a forced landing in a shopping mall parking lot in Roanoke, Virginia. The pilot and the one passenger reported no injuries. The airplane sustained substantial damage. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the flight, and a Visual Flight Rules (VFR) flight plan was filed. The business flight was conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. The flight originated in Hickory, North Carolina, at approximately 1740, with an intended destination of Bedford, Pennsylvania. The pilot stated that about an hour after he departed Hickory, North Carolina, the engine started to run rough. He said that he checked the fuel mixture, engine RPM, and applied full carburetor heat. The pilot indicated that he left the carburetor heat on for 3 to 4 minutes, then turned the carburetor heat off. According to the pilot, approximately thirty minutes later, the airplane was in cruise flight at 11,500 feet mean sea level (MSL) when the engine RPM began to decrease. The pilot reported that when the engine lost power, he applied full carburetor heat, and checked the airplane's position in relation to the nearest airport with the Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver. The pilot stated that the GPS receiver indicated that the Roanoke Regional Airport was 9.8 miles away on a 330 degree heading. The pilot reported he did not perform a complete restart checklist procedure and he did not confirm the position of the fuel selector valve. At 1902, the pilot contacted Roanoke air traffic control (ATC), advised them that the airplane had lost engine power, and requested an emergency landing at Roanoke. Roanoke ATC cleared the pilot for a straight-in approach to runway 33. The pilot stated that he had the runway in sight from a distance of nine miles and maintained ninety knots indicated airspeed (KIAS) throughout the approach. According to the pilot, the engine produced partial power until the airplane was 2.5 miles from the airport, then it "...lost total engine power." He stated that when the airplane was approximately one half mile from the airport at 2,500 feet MSL, he realized that he was not going to reach the runway. The pilot indicated that he made a left turn, and tried to land in the shopping mall parking lot "...because of the good lighting." The left wing of the airplane struck a light pole and a parked vehicle. Roanoke field elevation is 1176 feet MSL. The FAA controller who handled the airplane throughout the approach, stated: "The aircraft reported the lights in sight at six miles and I issued the wind and a landing clearance. The aircraft continued a rapid descent and crash landed approximately one-half mile from the end of runway 33." The controller said that he became concerned when he noticed a significant loss of altitude as the airplane approached the runway. The airplane had descended from an altitude of 6,300 feet at six miles to 3,500 feet at a distance of three miles. The Cessna Pilot's Operating Handbook for the accident airplane states, "After an engine failure in flight, the best glide speed (65 KIAS) should be established as quickly as possible." The 65 KIAS best glide speed provides a glide ratio of 9:1. A representative of the Cessna aircraft company stated that at 90 KIAS the glide ratio is 8:1. A postaccident inspection of the aircraft by Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspectors revealed no evidence of preimpact anomalies. The fuel appeared to be free of contamination and the carburetor heating system was determined to be mechanically sound and operational. A postaccident engine test run was completed, with no problems noted. The FAA Inspector stated, "We were unable to determine a firm cause for the engine stoppage, but either carburetor ice or fuel mismanagement (while switching from 'aux' to 'both') might have been a factor. He was cruising at 12,500 ft, where hypoxia might have become a factor, preventing him from recognizing the onset of carburetor icing in a timely fashion, or causing him to select the fuel to 'OFF', instead of 'BOTH'. The FAA inspector's report further noted that, "From 12,500 feet, 10 miles from the airport, the pilot still failed to make the runway (ROA field elevation is 1176)." A carburetor icing probability chart prepared by the FAA, is appended. (DOT/FAA/CT-82/44 Publication: Light Aircraft Piston Engine Carburetor Ice Detector/Warning Device Sensitivity/Efectiveness, June 1982). The pilot reported that the airplane's engine lost power at night when he was about ten miles south of Roanoke airport at 11,500 feet MSL. The pilot requested and received clearance for an emergency landing at Roanoke, and ATC vectored the airplane for a straight-in approach. The pilot reported the airport lights in sight from six miles and was cleared to land. The pilot stated that when the airplane was about 1/2 mile from the runway, he realized that he would not be able to reach the runway. He landed in a shopping mall parking lot about 1/2 mile south of the airport. During the landing, the airplane struck a vehicle and a light pole. Postaccident examination did not revealed a preimpact mechanical malfunction. The engine operated normally during a postaccident engine test run. The pilot reported that he performed his emergency descent at 90 KIAS, and did not complete the emergency check list procedures. According to the aircraft manufacturer, the best glide speed was 65 KIAS. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1996_IAD96LA053.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (icing, engine failure). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2023 · Reprint (Version printed in journal) Finite Element Simulation of Three Full-Scale Crash Tests for Cessna 172 Aircraft
The NASA Emergency Locator Transmitter Survivability and Reliability project was initiated in 2013 to assess the crash performance standards for the next generation of emergency locator transmitter (E…
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Conference Paper Crash Testing and Simulation of a Cessna 172 Aircraft: Pitch Down Impact Onto Soft Soil
During the summer of 2015, NASA Langley Research Center conducted three full-scale crash tests of Cessna 172 (C-172) aircraft at the NASA Langley Landing and Impact Research (LandIR) Facility.
- NASA NTRS 2019 · Technical Memorandum (TM) Simulating the Impact Response of Three Full-Scale Crash Tests of Cessna 172 Aircraft
During the summer of 2015, a series of three full-scale crash tests were performed at the Landing and Impact Research Facility located at NASA Langley Research Center of Cessna 172 aircraft.
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Enabling Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight Drones Operation over Open RAN 5G Networks with Slicing
Among the foretold claims of the transition from 5G to 6G, Beyond-Visual-Line-of-Sight (BVLoS) drone operation has emerged as a prominent Internet-of-Robots enabler.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Contractor Report (CR) Icing Physics Studies Using the 3D SIDRM Test Article: 2023 Icing Tests Analysis
In-flight icing is an important safety issue and is a factor that affects aircraft design and performance. Newer regulations are driving a need for improvements in airframe and engine icing simulation…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for UAV-Assisted 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Study of MAPPO, MADDPG, and MADQN
The growing demand for robust, scalable wireless networks in the 5G-and-beyond era has led to the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as mobile base stations to enhance coverage in dense urb…