IAD96LA102
1996-06-30 · CAMPBELLSVILLE, Kentucky, United States · Serious · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport AAS
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
the pilot's inadequate preflight preparation, his failure to remove the control lock, and his failure to abort the takeoff.
Factual narrative
On June 30, 1996, at 1240 eastern daylight time, a Beech 65, N3870C, was destroyed when it ran off the end of the runway and collided with a fence and terrain during an attempted takeoff from Taylor County Airport (AAS), in Campbellsville, Kentucky. The commercial rated pilot and two of the three passengers received serious injuries. The third passenger sustained no injuries. The airplane was destroyed by impact and postimpact fire. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident, no flight plan was filed. The flight was conducted under 14 CFR 91. According to a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector, the airplane "...was unable to get airborne..." during the takeoff roll. The FAA Inspector stated that after traveling the full length of the 4997 foot runway, the airplane ran off the departure end of runway 05 and continued approximately 2257 feet through an open field, a fence, a corn field and into a depression where it impacted terrain and came to rest. He reported that the aircraft engines separated from the airframe and the fuselage was destroyed by a post crash fire. The pilot said that while performing pre-takeoff checks he was interrupted by one of the passengers on board the aircraft. He reported, "After the interruption I failed to complete all the pre-takeoff steps [and] gust lock pin was not removed. Power was applied [and] takeoff speed was attained. When I attempted to rotate the A/C [aircraft], I found that the controls would not move. I attempted to remove the pin holding the controls, but was unsuccessful. The A/C [aircraft] went off the end of the runway through a fence and impacted an earthen berm that collapsed the gear [and] bladestrikes that stopped the engines." On scene examination of the accident site and the aircraft wreckage was performed by investigators from the FAA, the Campbellsville Police, the airframe manufacturer, and the aircraft engine manufacturer. According to one report, "No evidence of aircraft deceleration or braking was apparent up to the point of main landing gear collapse at the base of the first hill. Ground scars made by both propellers were found at the point of first ground impact ... Both propeller assemblies were found on the ground where they (impact) separated from the engines at the reduction gear case due to impact overload. Both propellers equally exhibited signs of absorbing high power on impact. Pronounced torsional blade bending, heavy leading edge nicks and gouges and tip damage was noted ... Examination of the pilots control wheel and shaft assembly revealed that the shaft support housing was fractured diagonally across the control lock pin hole location." According to the Owner's Manual (PN 65-001021-33A3), at maximum gross weight (7700 pounds), "Distance required to take- off and climb to 50 ft, flaps up, take-off power. Take-off speed: 95 mph (83kts.) TIAS." Altitude Outside Air Temperature Feet 0 F 25 F 50 F 75 F 100 F Sea Level 1363 1501 1645 1810 1962 2000 1496 1659 1814 1990 2166 According to a representative of the airplane manufacturer, using the Accelerate and Stop Distance chart from the Owner's Manual, "...the accelerate and stop distance ... determined from the chart at a gross weight of 7,700 pounds and under the following conditions: 1. With the Pressure Altitude at Sea Level and Outside Air Temperature at 100 F the Accelerate and Stop Distance computed to be 3630 feet. 2. With the Pressure Altitude at 2,000 feet MSL and Outside Air Temperature at 100 F the Accelerate and Stop Distance computed to be 3920." According to an FAA inspector, the airplane '...was unable to get airborne...' during the takeoff roll. He stated that after travelling the full length of the 4,997-foot runway, the airplane ran off the departure end of runway 5 and continued approximately 2,257 feet through an open field, a fence, a corn field and into a depression where it impacted terrain and came to rest. The pilot reported that during the takeoff roll he discovered that he had not removed the gust lock from the control column and that his attempts to remove it were unsuccessful. The pilot stated that the aircraft '...went off the end of the runway through a fence and impacted an earthen berm that collapsed the gear [and] bladestrikes that stopped the engines.' Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1996_IAD96LA102.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type. All research papers
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint nBMS, a Neuromorphic Battery Management System with a Silicon-Validated Spiking State-of-Charge Core for eVTOL Aircraft
State-of-charge (SoC) estimation for electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) aircraft must run on the vehicle under hard energy and certification budgets, on a duty cycle unlike anything in the…
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Improving Autonomous Nano-drones Performance via Automated End-to-End Optimization and Deployment of DNNs
The evolution of energy-efficient ultra-low-power (ULP) parallel processors and the diffusion of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are fueling the advent of autonomous driving nano-sized unmanned a…
- arXiv 2026 · arXiv preprint Trajectory Optimization of Morphing Aerial Vehicles Based on Mid-Fidelity Aeroservoelastic Models
Morphing aerial vehicles offer enhanced maneuverability and fuel efficiency compared to fixed-wing configurations. However, the trade-off between performance gains and control cost in dynamic, unstead…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint Hovering efficiency optimization of the cycloidal propeller with end plates
Cycloidal propellers are known for their omnidirectional vectored thrust, enabling smooth transitions between hovering and forward flight, making them ideal for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and ele…
- arXiv 2025 · arXiv preprint Shepherd Grid Strategy: Towards Reliable SWARM Interception
Modern unmanned aerial vehicle threats require sophisticated interception strategies that can overcome advanced evasion capabilities and operate effectively in contested environments.
- Semantic Scholar 2025 · Article (Urban Science) Prediction of Urban Air Mobility and Drone Accident Rates and the Role of Urban Management Systems
Urban air mobility (UAM) and drones can significantly improve traffic movement in saturated cities because the skies above them are not frequently used; furthermore, they do not require large-scale in…