NTSB CAROL · Event
Event IAD98LA066
Registry · N3099A
FAA Aircraft Registry record.
Make / Model
CESSNA 170B
Year of manufacture
1953 · 45 years old at event
Engine
CONT MOTOR C145 SERIES (145 hp)
Seats / Engines
4 seats · 1 engine
Last airworthiness date
19560603
ADS-B equipped
Yes — Mode-S A34455
Registrant of record
OLIVIERI DAMIAN L
Source: FAA Aircraft Registry (releasable master file).
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The flight instructor's failure to maintain control of the airplane which resulted in his intentional ground loop. A factor in the accident was the flight instructor's lack of currency in tailwheel airplanes.
Factual narrative
On May 30, 1998, about 1500 eastern daylight time, a Cessna 170B, N3099A, was substantially damaged during an intentional ground loop during the landing roll at the Weltzien Skypark (15G), Wadsworth, Ohio. The certificated flight instructor (CFI) was not injured, and the commercial pilot/owner received minor injuries. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed for the instructional flight conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. The flight originated from Weltzien Skypark, about 1400. The pilot/owner stated that this was his Biennial Flight Review. After takeoff and completion of air work and maneuvering in the local practice area, the pilot and CFI returned to the airport and landed. The pilot reported that after landing, the CFI recommended that he perform a short field, power off landings. The pilot reported that after two unsuccessful attempts, the CFI stated, "let me show you how to do it." The pilot also stated that while on final during the next approach, the CFI stated, "guard the controls." The pilot said that he was confused by that statement, but "placed his hands and feet near the controls to follow the CFI's inputs." The CFI reported that he used 40 degrees of flaps, and had 70 mph on the airspeed indicator, when he flared the airplane. The airplane then touched down on its main landing gear, and when it started to drift right, the CFI applied left rudder. He stated that the left rudder only traveled about 1 inch. He continued to depress the left rudder, when "all of a sudden, it seemed to let go," and full left rudder deflection occurred. The CFI stated that the airplane immediately went left and "with little runway remaining and the surrounding obstacles, he felt his only option was to kick full right rudder and intentionally ground loop the airplane." The pilot stated that he did not feel any binding, and his hands and feet were only "near the controls, not on them." He said that he felt the right rudder being applied, and when the tail wheel came down, the nose of the airplane went right and the empennage of the airplane swerved left. The airplane came to a stop 90 degrees right of the runway heading. The pilot stated that he had not been able to fly with any consistency for the last two years. He reported that the last annual inspection on the airplane was completed in December, 1996. The CFI had accumulated 4,769 flight hours, and 36 total hours were in make and model (tailwheel) airplane. The CFI had "0" hours in make and model during the last 90 days. A Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Inspector stated that the left landing gear was collapsed underneath the fuselage and the left wing and propeller were damaged from contact with the runway. On June 4, 1998, two FAA Inspectors examined the airplane. They reported that floor panels were removed, and the rudder cables were verified intact and properly installed. They stated that they found no "witness marks" of the rudder cables binding or rubbing, and all flight controls moved freely. The Airport/Facility Directory listed the runway as 2,360 feet long and 37 feet wide, and stated no touch and go landings. After two unsuccessful power-off landing attempts at a short field, the certificated flight instructor (CFI) took control of the tail wheel airplane to demonstrate the proper technique. On short final, the CFI told the pilot to, 'guard the controls,' who then placed his hands and feet near the controls. The CFI stated that he wanted the other pilot to correct any erroneous inputs during the landing. The airplane drifted right on touchdown, and the CFI responded with left rudder. The CFI reported that the rudder would move only about 1 inch, when it suddenly 'let go,' and full left rudder was applied. The airplane immediately went left, and with little remaining runway, the CFI kicked 'full right rudder to intentionally ground loop the airplane.' The pilot stated that he did not feel the binding. The CFI had a total of 36 hours in make and model, none in the last 90 days. Removal of the floor panels and a examination of the rudder cables verified proper installation, and no 'witness marks' of binding controls were found. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_1998_IAD98LA066.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint
Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (JAAER)
Analysis on the Negative Emotional, Physiological, and Cognitive Responses Elicited from of the Activation of a Stall Alarm
Failing to identify an aerodynamic stall can lead to the inability of an aircraft to sustain flight. To warn pilots of an impending or fully-developed stall, many aircraft have safety devices installe…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗