NTSB CAROL · Event
Event LAX00LA078
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
Failure of the pilot to maintain directional control of the airplane during the takeoff roll.
Factual narrative
On January 21, 2000, at 1505 hours Pacific standard time, an experimental Myers Q-2, N813S, descended and veered to the left of the runway during the takeoff initial climb at the Compton, California, airport. The airplane subsequently collided with two cars before coming to rest between two rows of hangars. The airplane, operated by the owner under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 91, was substantially damaged. The pilot, who holds a United States student pilot certificate and a Canadian commercial certificate, sustained minor injuries. No ground personnel were injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the flight that was originating at the time of the accident, and no flight plan was filed. The flight was scheduled to terminate at the Van Nuys Airport, Van Nuys, California. In the pilot's written statement to the Safety Board, he stated rotation speed is approximately 80-85 mph, and a "definite" amount of backpressure is required on the controls to rotate for takeoff. He further stated that the stall speed is 68 mph. The run-up was conducted with no discrepancies noted. The pilot noted the winds were variable at 5-10 knots and appeared to be a "little gusty." He made a radio call on Common Traffic Advisory Frequency (CTAF) that he was going to takeoff on runway 25L. At 70 mph, the airplane lifted off without manual input from the control stick. The pilot believed that the airplane was caught by a wind gust. As he attempted to settle the airplane to the ground and avoid a stall he noted that he was left of centerline. The left wing contacted the runway and turned the airplane approximately 20 degrees from the runway heading towards the taxiway. He reduced power and applied the brakes, which increased the direction of travel to the left. The pilot stated that a vehicle was heading towards him on the taxiway. He realized that he would not be able to maneuver the airplane on the taxiway as he had originally planned. When he looked forward, he saw a truck in his direction of travel. He stated that the airplane was level with the front of the truck. While attempting to maneuver around the parked truck and not place the airplane back into the path of the on-coming vehicle, the left canard struck the truck and was sheared off. The pilot stated that at that point he had "little or no control" of the airplane, it slid into a parked car, and came to rest near a hangar. He pulled out the mixture, shut the airplane down, and exited the airplane on his own. A witness to the accident reported no discrepancies with the sound of the engine. He stated that the airplane appeared to accelerate normally at his estimation of 80 mph. About 1/3 of the way down the runway, he observed the airplane either liftoff, or hop up about 5 feet in the air, then "fall off" on to its left wing and slide between hangar rows after it collided with the Compton Police Department tow truck. The airplane was inspected on scene by Safety Board investigators the day of the accident. Skid marks were found on the runway in between the runway and taxiway, as well as the taxiway in the airplane's direction of travel. White paint transfer from the airplane was observed on the truck's wheel well, as well as 2 feet from the aft of the truck's flatbed that ends where the airplane came to rest. Control continuity from the right canard to the cockpit and from the rudder to the cockpit was established. The left and right tires from the main landing gear were manually rotated to make sure they rotated freely and no discrepancies were noted. Both tires were inspected and found to have some rubbing present; however, there were no bald spots or scuffmarks observed. The brakes for both tires were manually activated and found to function with no anomalies. It was noted that the each brake contains its own master cylinder and when activated brake fluid was observed to flow through the lines. The purpose of the flight was to relocate the airplane to another airport. During the run-up, no discrepancies were noted with the airframe or engine. The pilot indicated that rotation speed was 80-85 mph, with a stall speed of 68 mph. On the takeoff roll, the airplane became airborne at 70 mph with no manual inputs from the pilot. He attempted to land the airplane to avoid a stall. The left wing contacted the runway and the airplane veered to the left. He reduced power and applied the brakes increasing the direction of travel to the left. The pilot observed a vehicle coming in his direction on the taxiway, as well as a parked vehicle on the taxiway. As he maneuvered to avoid the moving and parked vehicles, the left canard struck and was sheared off by the parked vehicle. The pilot was not able to control the airplane and it slid into a parked car and came to rest near a hangar. A witness stated that there were no discrepancies noted with the sound of the engine during the takeoff roll. He observed the airplane either liftoff, or hop up into the air, and then the left wing struck the runway. The airplane was inspected on scene with no discrepancies noted with airframe or braking system. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2000_LAX00LA078.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Beyond the agency record
Search this event elsewhere.
Pre-filled searches into the sources where news + community discussion of aviation events lives. External sources are reported, not agency. Treat them as signal that something happened, not as fact about what happened.
Entity-clustered aviation events in the press — last 24 hr + 30-day archive.
Official agency record + docket.
Investigative docket: factual reports, photos, transcripts.
Long-running aviation incident database (Flight Safety Foundation).
Community NTSB synthesis blog — often has photos and witness reports.
Gold-standard aviation incident blog.
Aviation industry news search.
GA pilot forum — informed but rumor-prone.
GA pilot subreddit search.
Tail-number page — flight history (free tier limited).
AOPA Air Safety Institute search.
Mainstream press coverage. Recent events only.
Privacy-preserving news search.
External links open in a new tab. We don't ingest their content; we deep-link search queries.
Related research
What the literature says.
Academic papers and agency reports matching this event's aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall). Sourced from NASA NTRS, NTSB Safety Studies, FAA CAMI, AOPA Air Safety Institute, Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons, arXiv, and the Semantic Scholar academic graph.
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper
Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint
Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint
Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (JAAER)
Analysis on the Negative Emotional, Physiological, and Cognitive Responses Elicited from of the Activation of a Stall Alarm
Failing to identify an aerodynamic stall can lead to the inability of an aircraft to sustain flight. To warn pilots of an impending or fully-developed stall, many aircraft have safety devices installe…
Browse the full corpus — academia portal ↗