LAX01LA064
2000-12-23 · BAKERSFIELD, California, United States · Minor · 1 aircraft · Status: Completed
Airport L45
Aircraft involved
Probable cause & findings
The pilot's inadequate in-flight planning, fuel management, and inadequate remedial actions, which resulted in a total loss of engine power due to fuel starvation. The pilot made an off-field landing and collided with a fence.
Factual narrative
On December 23, 2000, about 1430 hours Pacific standard time, a Cessna 140, N72970, sustained substantial damage when it landed short of the runway after losing engine power on final approach at Bakersfield Municipal Airport, Bakersfield, California. The airplane collided with the airport boundary fence and nosed over. The private pilot/owner was operating the airplane under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 91. The pilot and one passenger sustained minor injuries. The personal flight departed Hi Desert Airport, Joshua Tree, California, about 1330. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed. No flight plan had been filed. The pilot stated he flew from Corcoran, California, to Joshua Tree in the morning to pick up a passenger. He departed Corcoran with full fuel tanks. He planned to refuel at Bakersfield on the return trip. Due to elevation and runway length considerations, he did not add fuel at Joshua Tree. He did a solo takeoff to evaluate the airplane's performance prior to departing with the passenger aboard. He said he only used the left fuel tank for 5 minutes during the approach to Joshua Tree and the first 10 minutes following departure from Joshua Tree. The pilot described the events to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) accident coordinator. The pilot switched to the right tank passing through 2,000 feet on departure. He utilized the right fuel tank until it ran dry during cruise. About 1410, the pilot initiated a descent into Bakersfield. He applied carburetor heat as he reduced power to 2,200 rpm at 9,000 feet. About 5 minutes later, the engine stopped producing power. He estimated his position was 25 miles east of Bakersfield, at an altitude of 5,000 feet. He switched back to the right fuel tank and the engine started producing power. The pilot continued to fly on a straight-in approach to runway 34. The left tank indicated over 1/4 tank. He switched back to the left tank for landing. The engine stopped producing power again about 2 miles from the airport. The pilot thought he could make the airport. About 500 feet above the ground, he noticed the airport boundary fence. He felt he might strike it with the landing gear while in flight. He decided to land short of the airport. The airplane touched down a couple of hundred feet prior to the airport boundary fence. The airplane collided with the fence and overturned. The pilot saw fuel leaking from the inverted wing fuel tanks. He told the passenger to get out fast if he could. A sheriff's deputy on scene observed a small puddle of fuel under the inverted wings. The pilot described the airplane's systems to the FAA accident coordinator. He said each wing held 12.5 gallons of fuel. He said the airplane burns approximately 5 gallons per hour. He said either tank can supply fuel, but both tanks could not be used simultaneously. The pilot did not remember changing the fuel selector valve's position after landing. The FAA accident coordinator asked an aircraft mechanic, who is also a flight instructor, to examine the airplane. The mechanic observed fuel in the left fuel tank. A fuel sample from this tank contained a minute quantity of sediment. The sample was otherwise clear and free of contamination. He observed no fuel in the right fuel tank. He observed no contamination or blockage in the gascolator. He observed the carburetor heat in the on position. The mechanic observed the position of the fuel selector valve. It pointed to a position 20 to 30 degrees left of the right fuel tank position. It pointed to the middle of a placard that indicated right tank. However, the mechanic said he felt this position would not allow either tank to supply sufficient fuel to the engine. He observed a flexible detent that was installed to ensure proper position of the fuel selector valve when the right fuel tank was selected. The flexible detent bent down and was not useable. The mechanic reported that he was very experienced with Cessna 140 airplanes. He said the tanks could unport if the fuel quantity is low and the airplane is in a nose low attitude. He said that to select the right fuel tank, the selector valve should point straight forward. The off position is to the full right position. No fuel reaches the engine if the selector valve is not in the left or right position. During a forced landing precipitated by fuel starvation and a loss of engine power, the airplane collided with a fence and overturned. The engine stopped producing power about 2 miles from the airport, and the pilot thought he could make it to the airport. About 500 feet above the ground, he noticed the airport boundary fence. He felt he might strike it with the landing gear while in flight, so he decided to land short of the airport. After the airplane came to rest, the pilot saw fuel leaking from the inverted wing fuel tanks and evacuated the airplane. The pilot did not recall moving the fuel selector valve after landing. The fuel selector valve pointed to a position 20 to 30 degrees left of the right fuel tank position. It pointed to the middle of a placard that indicated right tank. However, a mechanic said he felt this position would not allow either tank to supply sufficient fuel to the engine. He observed a flexible detent that was installed to ensure proper position of the fuel selector valve when the right fuel tank was selected. The flexible detent bent down and was not useable. Source: NTSB Aviation Accident Database (Pre-2008 Archive) Retrieved: 2026-02-12
Verbatim from NTSB's published report. Source file
NTSB_2000_LAX01LA064.txt.
Findings + structured fields enriched from FAA avall.mdb.
Full investigation docket on
data.ntsb.gov ↗.
Search this event elsewhere
External sources are reported, not agency: signal that something happened, not fact about what happened.
- TallyAero Live Wire Aviation press
- NTSB CAROL Agency ↗
- NTSB Docket Agency ↗
- Aviation Safety Network Aviation press ↗
- Kathryn's Report Aviation press ↗
- Aviation Herald Aviation press ↗
- AVweb Aviation press ↗
- Pilots of America Community ↗
- Reddit /r/flying Community ↗
- FlightAware Aviation press ↗
- AOPA accident database Aviation press ↗
- Google News News ↗
- DuckDuckGo News ↗
Related research
Matched on aircraft type or causal vocabulary (stall, fuel starvation). All research papers
- NASA NTRS 2026 · Conference Paper Computational Analysis of Steady State Aerodynamics of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Configuration in Deep Stall
This study presents a computational investigation of steady state aerodynamics of the Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) configuration over a wide range …
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Automating Bird Diverter Installation through Multi-Aerial Robots and Signal Temporal Logic Specifications
This paper tackles the task assignment and trajectory generation problem for bird diverter installation using a fleet of multi-rotors.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Variation of Critical Crystallization Pressure for the Formation of Square Ice in Graphene Nanocapillaries
Two-dimensional square ice in graphene nanocapillaries at room temperature is a fascinating phenomenon and has been confirmed experimentally.
- arXiv 2023 · arXiv preprint Polycrystallinity enhances stress build-up around ice
Damage caused by freezing wet, porous materials is a widespread problem, but is hard to predict or control. Here, we show that polycrystallinity makes a great difference to the stress build-up process…
- arXiv 2022 · arXiv preprint Enhanced Prediction of Three-dimensional Finite Iced Wing Separated Flow Near Stall
Icing on three-dimensional wings causes severe flow separation near stall. Standard improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) is unable to correctly predict the separating reattaching flow due…
- Embry-Riddle Scholarly Commons 2021 · Journal article (JAAER) Analysis on the Negative Emotional, Physiological, and Cognitive Responses Elicited from of the Activation of a Stall Alarm
Failing to identify an aerodynamic stall can lead to the inability of an aircraft to sustain flight. To warn pilots of an impending or fully-developed stall, many aircraft have safety devices installe…